Since 1990, Michael Frost has written a series of articles and, finally, a treatise, all applying classical principles of rhetoric to modern legal writing and advocacy.164 His repeated reading and application of classical rhetorical texts to legal advocacy has defined his publishing career, and he has consistently — and rightly — strived to remind legal writers of their heritage
in classical rhetoric.
Three ways to persuade
in classical rhetoric.
Not exact matches
In Rhetoric and Biblical Interpretation they recommend that the definition of rhetoric be broadened to its fullest range in the classical tradition, namely as «the means by which a text establishes and manages it relationship to its audience in order to achieve a particular effect.&raqu
In Rhetoric and Biblical Interpretation they recommend that the definition of rhetoric be broadened to its fullest range in the classical tradition, namely as «the means by which a text establishes and manages it relationship to its audience in order to achieve a particular effect
Rhetoric and Biblical Interpretation they recommend that the definition of
rhetoric be broadened to its fullest range in the classical tradition, namely as «the means by which a text establishes and manages it relationship to its audience in order to achieve a particular effect
rhetoric be broadened to its fullest range
in the classical tradition, namely as «the means by which a text establishes and manages it relationship to its audience in order to achieve a particular effect.&raqu
in the
classical tradition, namely as «the means by which a text establishes and manages it relationship to its audience
in order to achieve a particular effect.&raqu
in order to achieve a particular effect.»
Yet he admits that the use of
classical rhetoric has its limitations and problems, especially
in establishing the conscious use of standards for oratory
in the writing of narratives and letters.
Such a conclusion is unwarranted, however, for (1) since Luke writes as a historian he evidently possessed some training
in grammar and
rhetoric, and therefore had learned to write
in various styles, and (2) he varies his own style
in accordance with the situation;
in Acts his style becomes more «
classical» as the gospel is brought closer to Rome.
His philological approach to language, encouraged by Erasmus and the whole neo-
classical movement, together with his long training
in rhetoric and his love of
classical literature, all contributed to his success.
Jack Maloney, an ad hominem is a
classical rhetorical fallacy, and as such it has meaning
in the context of formal debates conducted according to the rules of
classical rhetoric.
The most famous American example of tricolon is probably the Declaration of Independence's reference to «life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,» to which goals the drafters,
in another bow to
classical rhetoric, pledged «our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.»
Given the close relationship between
classical rhetoric and modern legal persuasion, it comes as no surprise that a number of contemporary writers have written about this relationship for the legal writing community.162 Two of the writers mentioned
in the introduction to this Article, Michael Frost and Michael Smith, have written repeatedly about this relationship and produced treatises with extensive commentary on the uses of
classical rhetoric in modern legal persuasion.163 Both treatises contain chapters on the uses of ethos
in modern legal persuasion, with useful advice for the modern legal advocate.
Teachers of
classical rhetoric taught their students to maximize the persuasive effect of words by presenting items and actions
in groups of three.