Not exact matches
Seek the Kingdom of God... feed the hungry...
clothe the
naked... visit the sick and those
in prison.
I myself am a Christian and when I go to mass every Sunday I am taught that our place
in Heaven is earned by helping others
in need (to
clothe the
naked, visit the imprisoned, feed the starving etc), Jesus was a man who shunned nobody and welcomed everybody who was willing to follow him.
But gee, so Dorothy Day, the SCLS and Martin Luther King and all those religiously oriented people who restrain their baser impulses, feed the hungry,
clothe the
naked, take
in children no one else wants, seek justice for those society devalues
in the name of money, power, or maintaining the hold of the class
in power — all based on their beliefs — are dangerous to society and mentally ill?
Feed the hungry...
clothe the
naked... visit the sick and those
in prison... and you've done all this to / for Jesus.
2 For indeed
in this house we groan, longing to be
clothed with our dwelling from heaven, 3 inasmuch as we, having put it on, will not be found
naked.
We are
naked in spite of our
clothing and they are
clothed in spite of their nakedness» (Ibid).
Mark alone adds the curious incident of the young man
clad only
in a linen cloth who tried to follow, and, when he was seized, slipped out of the cloth and fled
naked (Mk 14:51 - 52).
Also none of His references to the Judgement Day were religious as
in go to this Church or follow that religion but rather feed the hungry,
clothe the
naked, visit pr.isoners and the like.
41Then he will say also to those on the left hand, «Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire which is prepared for the devil and his angels; 42for I was hungry, and you didn't give me food to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me no drink; 43I was a stranger, and you didn't take me
in;
naked, and you didn't
clothe me; sick, and
in prison, and you didn't visit me.»
38When did we see you as a stranger, and take you
in; or
naked, and
clothe you?
In this present body we do indeed groan; we yearn to have our heavenly habitation put on over this one — in the hope that, being thus clothed, we shall not find ourselves naked.&raqu
In this present body we do indeed groan; we yearn to have our heavenly habitation put on over this one —
in the hope that, being thus clothed, we shall not find ourselves naked.&raqu
in the hope that, being thus
clothed, we shall not find ourselves
naked.»
For I was
naked, and you never
clothed me; I was hungry, and you gave me no food; I was sick, and you never visited me; I was
in prison and you never visited me.
In chapter 25 Jesus tells them that when they clothed the naked, took care of the sick and visited prisoners, they were in fact ministering to the body of Jesu
In chapter 25 Jesus tells them that when they
clothed the
naked, took care of the sick and visited prisoners, they were
in fact ministering to the body of Jesu
in fact ministering to the body of Jesus.
But
in vain he struggles thus; the difficulty he stumbled against demands a breach with immediacy as a whole, and for that he has not sufficient self - reflection or ethical reflection; he has no consciousness of a self which is gained by the infinite abstraction from everything outward, this
naked, abstract self (
in contrast to the
clothed self of immediacy) which is the first form of the infinite self and the forward impulse
in the whole process whereby a self infinitely accepts its actual self with all its difficulties and advantages.
Nonetheless, he is called to live
in the world, and to relieve suffering, to feed the hungry,
clothe the
naked, visit the sick and the prisoner.
Jesus says he will welcome into his kingdom those who have fed the hungry,
clothed the
naked and taken
in the homeless.
According to St. Matthew's gospel Jesus accepts
in the final judgment those who have fed the hungry and
clothed the
naked.
While Paul's thought is by no means always clear, and perhaps from letter to letter not always exactly the same, it is nevertheless certain that his concept of resurrection can be clearly distinguished from that of the traditional «bodily resurrection».27 Paul does not speak
in terms of the «same body» but rather in terms of a new body, whether it be a «spiritual body», 28 «the likeness of the heavenly man», 29 «a house not made by human hands, eternal and in heaven», 30 or, a «new body put on» over the old.31 In using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies as the externals which clothe the spirit and without which we should «find ourselves naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed, and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by natur
in terms of the «same body» but rather
in terms of a new body, whether it be a «spiritual body», 28 «the likeness of the heavenly man», 29 «a house not made by human hands, eternal and in heaven», 30 or, a «new body put on» over the old.31 In using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies as the externals which clothe the spirit and without which we should «find ourselves naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed, and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by natur
in terms of a new body, whether it be a «spiritual body», 28 «the likeness of the heavenly man», 29 «a house not made by human hands, eternal and
in heaven», 30 or, a «new body put on» over the old.31 In using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies as the externals which clothe the spirit and without which we should «find ourselves naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed, and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by natur
in heaven», 30 or, a «new body put on» over the old.31
In using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies as the externals which clothe the spirit and without which we should «find ourselves naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed, and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by natur
In using various figures of speech to distinguish between the present body of flesh and blood and the future resurrection body, he seems to be thinking of both bodies as the externals which
clothe the spirit and without which we should «find ourselves
naked».32 But he freely confesses that the «earthly frame that houses us today ’33 may, like the seed, and man of dust, be destroyed, but the «heavenly habitation», which the believer longs to put on, is already waiting
in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by natur
in the heavenly realm, for it is eternal by nature.
And when did we see You a stranger, and invite You
in, or
naked, and
clothe You?
For I was hungry, and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger and you invited Me
in;
naked and you
clothed Me; I was sick, and you came to Me.
In the
naked public square, we could still pretend that the emperor — or, perhaps, the rabbi — was fully
clothed.
What good is all the theology
in all the books
in all the libraries of the world if it doesn't cause a person to provide food and
clothing for the hungry and
naked (James 2:14 - 26)?
I was
naked and you
clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was
in prison and you came to me.»
«For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was
naked and you
clothed me, 1 was sick and you visited me, I was
in prison and you came to me.
I'd say: My savior is Jesus and Jesus says...... «Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the reign prepared for you from the foundation of the world for I was hungry and you gave Me food, I was thirsty and you gave Me drink, I was a stranger and you took Me
in, was
naked and you
clothed Me, I was sick and you visited Me, I was
in prison and you came to Me.»
In many ways, by doing that, you're ministering to Christ directly that when you welcome a stranger, or when you visit the prisoner, or when you feed the hungry and
clothe the
naked, you are serving Him.
When did we see You a stranger and take You
in, or
naked and
clothe You?
How many of us give our alms
in secret, rather than making sure they are identified so we'll get a tax credit?How many of us are, as a matter of course, feeding the hungry,
clothing the
naked, visiting the sick and the imprisoned?
(E.g., Luke 16:19 - 31) Thus,
in one of his most cogent pleas for humanitarian service as the test of true religion and the crucial point on which God judges man — «I was hungry» and ye gave me to eat; I was thirsty, and ye gave me to drink; I was a stranger, and ye took me
in;
naked and ye
clothed me; I was sick, and ye visited me; I was
in prison, and ye came unto me» (Matthew 25:31 - 46)-- the scenery of the parable is the old - fashioned eschatology.
Then the King will say to those on His right hand, «Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: for I was hungry and you gave Me food; I was thirsty and you gave Me drink; I was a stranger and you took Me
in; I was
naked and you
clothed Me; I was sick and you visited Me; I was
in prison and you came to Me.»
Scripture commands that the hungry be fed and the
naked clothed, so the group gives to needy Jews around the world, most notably
in the former Soviet Union, where it says it assists 100,000 people.
This violent history also remains hidden because it is
clothed in relative prosperity; it's no longer
naked in the way it was 80 or 90 years ago, and it's therefore more difficult to talk about.
No, I am not Roz... I am a Rozta» (big fan of Roz, and I made up the eponym) Roz is
in the Indian Ocean, somewhere, rowing from east to west (Australia to Madgascar, I think) and you have
in common with her that she is also
naked (salt water and
clothing make for a bad skin situation when one is
in that environment for months on end) You should look her up... writes a fantastic blog.
Such thinking would appear to eliminate organized religion from any concerted effort to deal with world hunger, poverty and illiteracy, public health and sanitation, and prison reform, despite the disturbing implications of Christ's warning:»... for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was
naked and you
clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was
in prison and you came to me....
«Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not
in:
naked, and ye
clothed me not: sick, and
in prison, and ye visited me not.
The judgment scene
in Matthew 25 answers the question: The sheep inherit the kingdom because they feed Jesus when he's hungry,
clothe him when he's the
naked, visit him when he's sick and imprisoned, welcome him when he's a stranger.
There's nothing wrong with those activities, however, they quite often are
in place when there are no programs to feed the hungry,
clothe the
naked, visit the sick, or those
in prison.
Then the virtuous will say to him
in reply, «Lord, when did we see you a stranger and make you welcome;
naked and
clothed you; sick or
in prison and go to see you?»
And sometimes,
in a
naked reverse, they watch fully
clothed games
The key here is that diaper - free time can mean
naked or without diapers (
in clothing or undies or whatnot).
Dressing your child
in a state that is as close to
naked as possible - think light sundresses or just a tank top and a loosely fitting diaper -
in the hopes that freedom (from restrictive
clothing) will reign.
Babies are wrapped
in thin strips of cloth, allowed to be
naked and worn by their mothers or siblings
in slings or dressed
in light
clothing without many fasteners.
My agenda to
clothe my two - year - old collides with his interest
in remaining
naked.
The infant is worn
in a sling,
naked against the mother, until the umbilical stump falls off, and only then is dressed
in clothing.
Nearly
naked teens
in clothing advertisements, sure why not.
And don't do diaper - free time (
naked or
in clothing) if you don't feel confident or can't keep it very sanitary, discreet, and overall feel - good.
Meanwhile, «lads» mags», which usually contain images of scantily
clad or
naked women, were available for sale
in over 50,000 workplaces.
The light layers I wore all spring are starting to get a little heavy, but I feel «
naked»
in only a few articles of
clothing.
Apparently society is celebrating a magazine who is known for featuring half
naked women
clad in... View the Post
In short, it was just me, naked on a Friday night, in a room full of clothed stranger
In short, it was just me,
naked on a Friday night,
in a room full of clothed stranger
in a room full of
clothed strangers.