Sentences with phrase «in common sense ways»

We need to continue to focus on cutting our debt and defecit in common sense ways, and hopefully, next year, the goal is to go through the regular appropriations process department by department, committee by committee, instead of one end of the year spending bill.»
Actually, Whiteheadian thinking supports what people in a common sense way are likely to think anyway.
This time after a 100 + times of failing, I decided not to do the same thing and realize it takes time to lose weight and that if I exercise in a common sense way for where I am at physically, I'll do good.
«Unlike other old - fashioned methods, Manners for the Modern Dog resolves behavior problems in a common sense way.
It is the quality of legal services, marketed in a common sense way, rendered to clients which produces the psychic and monetary rewards which lawyers seek.
This conclusion is supported by the stance of the Court of Appeal in Lake, seeking in a common sense way to balance the conflicting interests.

Not exact matches

«We're not going to see a complete redo of Dodd - Frank, nor should we... We're going to see some sensible, pragmatic common - sense changes to eight years of regulation... Things won't happen in a dramatic way, but it will definitely happen.»
The best way to make a positive first impression, especially in business, is to embrace uncommon common sense.
Design is a fluid concept and in many ways, can even seem like common sense.
«You have to find a way to elevate yourself to be above common sense,» he said, speaking to an audience of entrepreneurs at the Inc. 5000 conference in Phoenix on Friday.
The group incentive nature of employee stock ownership and profit sharing makes this an effective way to create and reinforce a sense of common purpose, and to encourage higher commitment and productivity.23 It is also the case with ESOPs that the new ownership might not be viewed by the firm in the same way as other added compensation because the ownership is financed through loans to buy new capital as company stock, with Federal tax incentives, and the shares are not paid as normal wages and benefits out of company budget reserved for this purpose.
One common - sense way forward is to presume that if Trump did cause Stormy Daniels to be threatened in that manner, she is unlikely to be the only one.
But, in general, there is way too much talking about definitions, rules, etc. in value investing and worrying about what can be tested empirically and so on and not enough talk about common sense.
One of the key principles is that Fed policymakers «should assess whether we can adjust regulation in common - sense ways that will simplify rules and reduce unnecessary regulatory burden without compromising safety and soundness.»
But not only was the Reaganite touting of America's innate decency and common - sense revealed to be quite naïve by the developments of 2005 - 2013, the Reaganite free - market philosophy was revealed in a number of ways to be deficient.
So could you honestly say that you don't think anyone has ever become religious, especially much later on in life as the end isn't far off (and even statistics that common sense would tell you should trend the opposite way, ie, someone who's gone 70, 75 years not believing in god or heaven, decides then to become a devote Christian?
Instead, and I don't even understand why I need to be telling you this, just let common sense serve as your moral compass and devote your time and resources to activities that actually benefit your fellow man in tangible, practical ways.
Traditions with a stronger sense of the common good, a better understanding that we need each other and will not make it all alone — in one way Judaism, in another Catholicism.
Well, then clearly common sense dictates that they need to be ministered TO, and they can certainly find other ways to give other than fiscally while they are in that position.
So the challenge for us is to conceptualize our Christian faith in a way that is not dependent on the common sense of a different time, in a way that is understandable to us today.
In an important way our faith can be said to be parallel to our common sense.
There is no way to escape the fact that our common sense approach to the universe, our common sense of how it works, is very different in some important ways from the common sense of the Biblical authors and the formulators of orthodox Christian doctrine.
What is needed is a theology that explains God's presence and workings in a way that is consistent with this common sense, a theology that doesn't leave God in the unexplained fringes of our ignorance.
In short, I see no way in which theology can get on safely without history, philosophy and common sensIn short, I see no way in which theology can get on safely without history, philosophy and common sensin which theology can get on safely without history, philosophy and common sense.
Our common sense does not allow us to believe that God intervenes in our finite physical processes in this way.
Similarly — and our common sense, modern philosophy, and the vast bulk of scientists are in agreement on this — while life and non-life both involve chemical reactions, life is qualitatively different in some very important ways.
We took occasion to note that Amos» thought of the universality of God was in some way dependent on his sense of a common human standard of right and wrong.
I'm not saying you or other deluded people can't be nice, but I need you to do it in a rational way using common sense, logic, and reason to the best of your abilities for the sake of everyone on this planet including yourselves.
We have already seen that the orthodox belief in the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth is (1) only one of the possible ways of explaining his centrality that can be developed from the New Testament; (2) does not fall within the limits of what is logically possible; and (3) is contrary to our common sense.
Since the constant in the New Testament is the centrality of Jesus and his message, and not any particular explanation of why and how he is central, we are then free to interpret this centrality in a way that meets the needs of our own day and our own common sense, so long as we remain compatible with the basic thrust of Jesus» teaching.
«How can anyone pay any attention to a doctrine that grew out of a Greek conceptual system being imposed on Jewish Scriptures, that was as foreign to Jesus as it is to us, that depends on concepts and a common sense that have gone the way of the Roman Empire, and that is about as understandable as if it were still written in ancient Greek?»
It echoes with our common sense and our desire to get along with one another in a workable way and achieve things.
How can we justify this authority for Jesus of Nazareth in a way consistent with our common sense theology?
This is sufficient for our faith — that we have a trustworthy guide — and this fits with our common sense in a way that other kinds of claims about Jesus do not.
In this way he combines the direct realism of common sense with the causal theory of physiology.
1) multiple interpretations of the Bible exist 2) there are many ways to apply the teachings of the Bible to public life 3) no one denomination or spokesperson has a monopoly on how to accurately interpret the Bible and apply it to public life 4) because we live in a pluralistic society, we must learn to raise the level of public discourse so that we not only appeal to our specific religious tradition, but to a common sense of morality and justice
As essayist Katha Pollitt points out, the tendency to ascribe «particular virtues — compassion, patience, common sense, nonviolence — to mothers» is an overdone, and in some ways oppressive, cliché; telling yourself that toilet training a string of two - year - olds is good for your soul may keep you away from other worlds.
The Old Rail Splitter was, in many ways, a man of natural grace whose words and actions show ¯ as Lord Charnwood noted in his excellent 1916 biography ¯ a «most unusual sense of the possible dignity of common men and common things.»
There was a time in this country when stupid people at least had enough common sense not to engage in conversation about things that were way above their heads.
«The government has put forward a common - sense solution that ensures that Americans won't be forced to violate their deepest convictions while maintaining multiple ways for people to obtain the drugs in question if they want them.»
In a general way, then, and «on the whole,» our abandonment of theological criteria, and our testing of religion by practical common sense and the empirical method, leave it in possession of its towering place in historIn a general way, then, and «on the whole,» our abandonment of theological criteria, and our testing of religion by practical common sense and the empirical method, leave it in possession of its towering place in historin possession of its towering place in historin history.
The way this plays out for most Catholics and confessional Protestants is in a kind of interim faith, a common - sense Christianity that stays fairly close to the ground.
Is it not exactly this abstract level which is sooner and more appropriately to be defined as the «world» — as does even common sense thinking, which frequently confuses «nature» and «world» in a precarious way?
That is in no sense or way a logical answer, nor is it based on common sense (maybe it is a common sense-less argument).
The objects of perception from which common sense «proceeds» and which conventional theories assume to be such that we come into contact with them in an utterly elementary way, are results of complicated operations or, in other words, the concretion of complicated constellations which are to be thoroughly studied and explained.
Common sense and an education (neither of which you appear to have) go a long way In this world... no heaven, no planet for you to go to, no hell; nothing within your books can be shown to be true... do you care about the truth or are you a simple - minded fool merely wasting the only life you'll ever get for the grand delusion of something after?
Tribalism is an important part of football rivalry, but sometimes it can get in the way of common sense.
Tribalism is a key part of supporting any club BUT when it stands in the way of common sense, it becomes the enemy of the club and, by definition, those who reject common sense, also become our club's enemies.
Many of us as fans are allowing our EGO or PRIDE to get in the way of COMMON SENSE.
andcliff, It's those anti-wenger glasses getting in the way of common sense yet again.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z