Sentences with phrase «in context the quote»

In that context she quotes a helpful passage from Sartre's L'Etre et le neant:

Not exact matches

To put things in context, Bell followed that quote up by expressing his disappointment when communities of faith discourage people from asking questions about religious texts or beliefs.

«I put air quotes around that phrase because whenever people say it, I feel like they're trying real hard to put the stock market in the context of some sort of game,» the «Mad Money» host said on Tuesday.

Here, again, is the context for the direct quote of Thomas Mulcair's that appears in the new Conservative attack ad.

You can listen to that interview in its entirety here, but here is the quote in its immediate context.

There is a verse quoted widely in Christian circles, out of context.

if you really want to understand why, read the entire text that was quoted by One One in the context that leads up to those scriptures.

This following quote is given in the context of this same argument.

In a post below, I used quote from Coolidge about «the chief business of the American people is business» and the context of the quote was the intimate relationship between the press and American business, since the press is American business.

, in the name of your creator, who created man from a clot...», [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FUTtKFH-KU] so rather than quoting what the terrorists quote (who BTW are misleading muslims and opponents alike, by reading verses out of context), use your logic, use your intelligence, read and understand.

Similarly, mistranslation of the greek and quoting out of historical, cultural and topical context has turned Paul into a misogynist when in fact he, like his Messiah, were revolutionary in their teachings, establishing in the church God's original design for man (including the restoration of gender equality and proper relations) which was restored through the redemptive work of the cross.

To all of you quoting scripture, your not supposed to read a sentence in the bible and look for meaning to understand it's meaning you need the context which is the entire bible.

That quote was from one of the press conferences where Mr Lennon was trying to explain his «We [Beatles] are more popular than jesus» comments, which were taken out of context by xian zealots in 1966.

But, like a lot of controversies involving statements made by Christian leaders, a larger context is ignored in favor of sensational quotes.

But Jesus definitely stopped mid-verse in Luke 4:18 - 19, and the context of the passage he quoted is definitely violent... so I guess what I am saying is that the ultimate context of Scripture is the person and work of Jesus Christ.

by the way, before you stupidly claim that the scripture is taken out of context, know that jesus was quoted more than once on this subject in the bible.

In other words, the quote is being used within the context of a theological position and it means what they assert it to mean (or don't even bother to assert, but merely assume we should see) at least partially because of their presuppositions with which they come to the text.

Personally, I think that the context includes not only where in Scripture the passages are from (including rhetorical function, narrative position, etc.) and the historical - cultural background, but also the context of the person using the quote.

If they ever floated into view, unless chapter and verse were also quoted in a very circumscribed context, they were dismissed as «liberal», «socialist», «unrealistic», «under the law», «wimpy do - good social gospel» — you get the drift.

Which is exactly how the context in which the above quote is situated in my book demands that it be read.

On this point, he placed himself in alliance with Arthur Holmes and quoted approvingly of Holmes» criticisms that Clark had not properly understood the purpose of philosophy to elaborate a vision of life through a number of sources, including the philosopher's own historical context.

When I quoted «do away with the yoke of oppression, with the pointing finger and malicious talk» it was in the context of your admission «I lean towards the pointing finger» you have not address this.

His Zionism, that is to say, is defined here in the context of the hostility to anti-Semitism which he had recently expressed in his diary and in the Debater articles I have quoted.

Let's read the quote in context: Matthew 16:15 - 18 «He said to them, «But who do you say that I am?»

Quoting Scripture in this way is similar to how the devil quoted Scripture to Jesus in the wilderness: the Scripture is ripped out of context and completely misapplied.

WEll I guess I your quote from Kierkegaard surprised me when his approach to Hermeneutics ignores the text's original context adn interprets existentially or experientially in the contemporary context.

The context in both places where the verse is quoted shows at least that Matthew understood it to mean that human welfare is more important than correct ritual.

As an aside, I think the quote about «Others can set the boundaries...» is fairly context specific — I don't think it is a statement on boundary setting and criticism in general.

BTW People keep saying the quotes are out of context because sadly enough it is the fall back position of most Christians when confronted not only by the ugliness in the Bible, but also the hypocrisy of those who claim to follow it.

Nobody likes to be quoted out of context, but it probably happens to Jesus more than anybody else in all of history.

The difficulty is, however, that the crippled quote from the Catechism appears in the context of discussing homosexuality.

Quote the bible in context.

It appears only once, and in the context of another person's quote.

This verse is often quoted by Bonhoeffer, and it strange that in this context an Old Testament verse should be used to delineate what the church should or should not be, especially since he emphasizes the kingdom of Christ as opposed to the kingdom of God.

My further efforts to put the article in context, however, yielded one succinct observation by Dietrich von Hildebrand quoted in Pope John's Council by Michael Davies: «The innovators would replace holy intimacy with Christ by an unbecoming familiarity.

Joan Chittister is quoted by Martin E. Marty in his Context newsletter.

Darwinists disagree with creationists as a matter of definition, of course, but the degree of contempt that they express for creationism in principle requires some explanation beyond the fact that certain creationists have used unfair tactics such as quoting scientists out of context.

In the context of the quote in 1st Peter, he is saying that we are redeemed ``... with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.&raquIn the context of the quote in 1st Peter, he is saying that we are redeemed ``... with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.&raquin 1st Peter, he is saying that we are redeemed ``... with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.»

In discussing the regional geology (p. 807) and age (p. 811) of the Koongarra uranium deposits, Snelling 2 describes their geological history in fairly technical terms, however, to avoid the charge we lay against the creationists, of taking quotations out of context, I will quote Snelling 2 verbatim from the paper (p. 807In discussing the regional geology (p. 807) and age (p. 811) of the Koongarra uranium deposits, Snelling 2 describes their geological history in fairly technical terms, however, to avoid the charge we lay against the creationists, of taking quotations out of context, I will quote Snelling 2 verbatim from the paper (p. 807in fairly technical terms, however, to avoid the charge we lay against the creationists, of taking quotations out of context, I will quote Snelling 2 verbatim from the paper (p. 807):

But I fail to see how a single verse like Luke 17:34 (which in context has little or no bearing on homosexual marriage / behavior), or even several bare verses from various places in Scripture that are often quoted on this issue, make for worthwhile conversation.

Lanzetta quotes Benedict XVI in the context of ecumenism, but valid in the wider context, «Knowing the truth is a right of the conversation partner in every true dialogue.

If you do not know Christ (He is in scripture from Genesis through Revelation, if you cared to look), except for the usual few well - known and - worn quotes out of context, why are you writing about Him?

So like I said, try actually reading the entire passage in context before you quote something that you clearly have ZERO knowledge of.

If anyone wants a nice summary that accurately quotes these same sources in an appropriate context rather:

When a question is raised which for most people demands careful thought and responsible personal decision, people like that will very often simply quote a passage from the Scriptures, frequently in no way directly relevant to the matter under discussion and when relevant only valuable in the context of another age and under other conditions than those which are ours today.

Unfortuantely, the quote from Colossians discussed in point 1 above is frequently cut short and therefore taken out of context.

The word substance is used in this context in its classical meaning as defined by Descartes: «And when we conceive of substance, we merely conceive an existing thing which requires nothing but itself in order to exist» (quoted in Whitehead 1930, 92).

In fact, seen from the broader cultural context, Jesus can be described as a Reformer of patriarchal society.63 It is worthy to quote from Witherington that, «taking all the probably authentic material in the gospels together, it would appear that Jesus was a reformer of patriarchal societIn fact, seen from the broader cultural context, Jesus can be described as a Reformer of patriarchal society.63 It is worthy to quote from Witherington that, «taking all the probably authentic material in the gospels together, it would appear that Jesus was a reformer of patriarchal societin the gospels together, it would appear that Jesus was a reformer of patriarchal society.

Being familiar with Hume's work, may I put that quote in context for you?

(Wikipedia, in this case) An honest person would also provide relevant context around the quotation used (it comes right after the bit you quoted)