Sentences with phrase «in counter attacking football»

So what CF would you use in counter attacking football?

Not exact matches

I hate to agree with you but LCFC could very well be an ideal team for Theo, good counter attacking football and if Theo finds his form in a system like that...

the point im trying to make is that if we have a DM it will slow the counter attacks down, giving BFG a few extra seconds to read the play, therefore getting the best out of him...... im not a football manager or a coach, but its not only me who can see this flaw in our game, its the whole world.....

They aren't attractive in their football and as a counter attacking team they don't possess much speed either.

I believe tgere are 3 titke contenders this year Leicester, city and arsenal About Leicester they are doing great but there football depends on counter attacking and few quick passes to reach the ball to mahrez or vardy i don't think they can impress anybody if they faced teams that park the bus like what the teams do with arsenal and also any injury for mahrez or vardy will ruin there season so i don't consider them a real challenge and in an open game we got the best out of them and beat them with 5 goals to 2 so calm down gooners About city they had very impressing start for the season then they were vety baf winning most games by pure luck or last minute goals and they could be beaten easily Arsenal are the best team form we controled most of the games and the losses and draws were by bad referee decisions or bad luck and the 4 points margain with city could have been easily 10 or 12

Last season Lei started with attacking football, but they always concede first, sometimes they had to come from 2goals down to draw like 5/6 games in a row... But later, they saw the weakness and played on the counter...

Leicester City had the least possession in the majority of their games and also Athletico Madrid play that defencive counter attacking football too.

Some may point to the fact that Chelsea only had 3 but if you assess the situation, Chelsea were never going to come out guns blazing at Arsenal, Chelsea thrive on controlling the game and counter attacks, having a free flowing game of attacking football is in Arsenal's best interest not Chelsea's and as such they would do everything to break up the play, seek for one off opportunities to get a goal and or get goals from set pieces and it worked like a charm against us.

He should be on the pitch unless we play strictly counter attack football and that is maybe 2 % of the time if we play in the CL and have a goal differential lead.

2) Invitation to attack us — Arsenal football philosophy had quietly shifted and now we were inviting opponents to come and attack us as they would see we were not operating in full attack gears and it was easy for them to get into our defending side of the pitch much quicker as they countered lesser bodies on the way.

The main problem for me is our tactics; central midfielders occupying wing positions with wingers on the bench, no runners ever in behind the opposition defence, passing football with no end product, nobody driving forward at pace with the ball, instead opting for a sideways or backwards pass and an overall lack of counter attacking, penetrating play.

Wenger must play counter attacking football against stoke in order to stop them from parking the bus and should win by 3 or 4 or more goals to increase the confidence against chelsea at Stanford bridge.

Most goals were counter attack not a typical arsenal style but we have result in counter football.

I don't care that we do not have 70 % possession anymore, we are still playing good football, in fact I find out more counter attacking game more enjoyable to watch and most importantly we are getting the 3 points!

Through balls from Ramsey and Carzola (if he finds his boots) and factor in big Welbeck's turn of speed with Sanchez pulling defenders all over the left side of the pitch and we could (if Wenger doesn't slow it down) have some beautiful attacking / counter attacking football on the horizon.

Do nt get carried away gooners Arsene Wenger did create the Invincibles, he does know what hes doing so teaching an old dog new tricks has nothing to do with it, but im gonna say he never had the money or right players for this type of counter attacking football and times even in fabregas era we saw flashes of brilliance that Arsenal have based that around the philosiphy of the club and maybe just maybe its finially coming to fruition and every player / coach has bought into it.

yes, in modern football you adapt your tactics with the team you face.i think wenger et players have finally understand it and when we play a team which win possession we let them the ball and kill them in counter attack!!!

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

A football coach would be great / WR coach in training for runs, and CB coach would be greta for our defenders b / c they specialize in understand how opposition attackers will run to attack the goal and what spaces to exploit, and how to counter / manipulate / trick others.

What I don't understand is the tactics, counter attacking football works well against sides who are comfortable on the ball and struggle to either gain width, that aren't direct enough in their attack or have no aerial threat.

It would be a complete turn in the philosophy of the club — our philosophy has been free flowing football (not so much recently) but under Simeone it will be compact, defensive and counter attacking — a bit like George Graham but with more flair.

haha you have to say it was decent counter attacking football for our first time in god knows how long

Ramsey has the qualities needed for the modern box to box were as wilshere doesn't really he is ok over a short distance with a short burst but beyond that he is quite static in the middle, but is excellent technically and can play a quick pass when he is on form use him as a springboard to launch counter attacks from any new manager that comes in will either help him improve or he will be a casualty of the new regime, unfortunately that reality of life in football i hope for one both of them stay and help us win trophies in years to come COYG

we're going to have to absorb a fair amount of pressure and imo giroud offers an outlet as he keeps possession better in the middle and attacking third of the pitch, unless we're looking to play counter attacking football I think he'll start

YES set up a team not to loss» had to beat» that can press the opposition well as a team and as individuals like sanchze does it not pretending to press lolh while playing position football with purpose and counter attacking football that has a well balanced squad in terms of age, wclass talent + above average players who improve every season

BUt with a team that plays attacking football like Arsenal, where the opposition is usually running at you in counter attacks he has NO place.

We've all seen him thrive with Leicester's counter attacking football and you expect him to want to come walk the ball in the net with us?

By virtue of their fluid passing and strong attacking mentality football, this is a position that is vital for the Reds as more than often it is the defending midfielder who is in way of a strong counter attack.

You can't play counter attacking football against WBA at home because they will never attack in enough numbers for us to be able to.

We need to start of really attacking like we did in the Liverpool game and also need to adapt to counter attacking football like against Real Madrid.»

The Blues, irresistible in the opening period, opened a three - goal lead by the break after playing some scintillating counter attacking football.

Mourinho claimed that he watched sides go to Old Trafford in previous seasons and try to beat United by playing an open game of football, with the hosts relying on counter attacking to win matches.