Sentences with phrase «in cultural cognition»

This seems to be a problem in cultural cognition.

Seeing the study this way, I now often find myself reflecting on what sorts of cues might have analogous effect in cultural cognition settings.

Not exact matches

In their February 2010 article entitled «Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus», Dan Kahan, Hank Jenkins - Smith and Donald Braman examine the tendency of individuals to perceive risk with biases congenial to their visions of how society should be organized.

The term «cognition» is also used in a wider sense to mean the act of knowing or knowledge, and may be interpreted in a social or cultural sense to describe the emergent development of knowledge and concepts within a group that culminate in both thought and action.

«The scientists should just tell us what they know and not worry too much about whether there's too much gloom and doom in it,» says Dan Kahan, a Yale law and psychology professor who leads the Cultural Cognition Project, studying public perceptions of risk.

The differences are dictated by known cultural differences in cognition and social norms.»

The team became interested in curiosity because of its ongoing collaborative research project to improve public engagement with science documentaries involving the Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School, the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania, and Tangled Bank Studios at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

The Cultural Cognition Project is a group of scholars interested in studying how cultural values shape public risk perceptions and related policy Cultural Cognition Project is a group of scholars interested in studying how cultural values shape public risk perceptions and related policy cultural values shape public risk perceptions and related policy beliefs.

Child language brokering in linguistic minority communities: Effects on cultural interaction, cognition, and literacy.

She also served as a cultural affairs policy researcher through a partnership with the Houston Mayor's Office and is a former member of a Rice University research team that focused on memory and cognition in relation to learning.

CALICO Journal Cambridge Journal of Education Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Canadian Journal of Action Research Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics - Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquee Canadian Journal of Education Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Canadian Journal of Environmental Education Canadian Journal of Higher Education Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology Canadian Journal of School Psychology Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Canadian Modern Language Review Canadian Social Studies Career and Technical Education Research Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals CATESOL Journal CBE - Life Sciences Education CEA Forum Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education Chemical Engineering Education Chemistry Education Research and Practice Child & Youth Care Forum Child Care in Practice Child Development Child Language Teaching and Therapy Childhood Education Children & Schools Children's Literature in Education Chinese Education and Society Christian Higher Education Citizenship, Social and Economics Education Classroom Discourse Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas Cogent Education Cognition and Instruction Cognitive Science Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching College & Research Libraries College and University College Composition and Communication College Quarterly College Student Affairs Journal College Student Journal College Teaching Communicar: Media Education Research Journal Communication Disorders Quarterly Communication Education Communication Teacher Communications in Information Literacy Communique Community & Junior College Libraries Community College Enterprise Community College Journal Community College Journal of Research and Practice Community College Review Community Literacy Journal Comparative Education Comparative Education Review Comparative Professional Pedagogy Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education Composition Forum Composition Studies Computer Assisted Language Learning Computer Science Education Computers in the Schools Contemporary Education Dialogue Contemporary Educational Technology Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood Contemporary Issues in Education Research Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE Journal) Contemporary School Psychology Contributions to Music Education Counselor Education and Supervision Creativity Research Journal Creighton Journal of Interdisciplinary Leadership Critical Inquiry in Language Studies Critical Questions in Education Critical Studies in Education Cultural Studies of Science Education Current Issues in Comparative Education Current Issues in Education Current Issues in Language Planning Current Issues in Middle Level Education Curriculum and Teaching Curriculum Inquiry Curriculum Journal Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences

Finally, the Institute focuses on how the development of cognition can aid in the analysis and design of effective literacy, mathematics and science instruction, taking into account how the social and cultural dimensions influence learners and outcomes.

He has been publishing academic books and papers about the Pirahã (pronounced pee - da - HAN) for more than twenty - five years, but his work remained relatively obscure until early in 2005, when he posted on his Web site an article titled «Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã», which was published that fall in the journal Cultural Anthropology.

In addition to the artworks on view there will be a display by the School of Psychology, Bangor University comprising cultural artifacts, documents and other items showing the connection between physical objects and our cognition.

In considering his argument, the work of Kahan and others on cultural cognition, and the paralyzed polarization of environmental politics, the next step, of course, is to test fresh paths toward an energy menu that works for the long haul.

I agree that cultural cognition — the idea that we shape our views so they agree with those in the groups with which we most closely identify, in the name of acceptance by our group and thus of safety — powerfully explains the polarized passions over whether climate change is «real,» the «debate» that gets most of the attention about public opinion.

I accept that humanity will always have this dynamic tension between individualists and communitarians, which is delineated so beautifully in «cultural cognition» research.

The piece spends quite a bit of time, appropriately on the fascinating work of Dan Kahan, the Yale law professor who is a leader of the ongoing «Cultural Cognition» research project and was the focus of my piece on how one can choose a Nobel Prize winner in physics to suit just about any view on human - driven climate change.

The paper, «Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus,» was written by Dan Kahan, a law professor at Yale, University of Oklahoma political science professor Hank Jenkins - Smith and Donald Braman, a law professor at George Washington University, and is scheduled for publication in the Journal of Risk Research.

Not to deny by any means the importace of thinking about the US vs. UK differences — in public opinion & in how public opinion bears on political decisionmaking — but we did use our framework to test how cultural cognition, measured w / our scales, affects English (yes, English; not entire UK) public engagement with informaton on climate change.

When mechanisms of cultural cognition figure in her reasoning, a person processes information in a manner that is equivalent to one who is assigning new information probative weight based on its consistency with her prior estimation (Figure 9).

My point was that, if we accept this basic story (it's too simple, even as an account of how cultural cognition works; but that's in the nature of «models» & should give us pause only when the simplification detracts from rather than enhances our ability to predict and manage the dynamics of the phenomenon in question), then there's no reason to view the valences of the cultural meanings attached to crediting climate change risk as fixed or immutable.

I was interested in the climate wars prior to that — but hearing what she had to say piqued my interest because for quite a while I have been interested in what sorts of things bias how people reason I have been particularly interested in how people use pattern - finding to make sense of the world, and how people's cultural / social / ideological / experiential / psychological identifications affect their cognition and reasoning.

And I would offer a similar criticism of that as well, as IMO, you neither ground that form of analogizing in a scientific manner; as I have told you, I think that your inclusion and exclusion criteria selection process is quite arbitrary, and I don't think that it is coincidence that it confirms your distinction of a group you belong to («skeptics») from a group you criticize («realists») in ways that (1) reaffirm a superiority in the group you belong to and, (2) I consider to be superficial and not meaningful as compared to the vastly more important underlying similarities (e.g., the tendency toward identity protective behavior, motivated reasoning, cultural cognition, confirmation bias, emotively - influenced reasoning, etc.)...

So what we have is someone who is clearly identified with an in - group (in your case «skeptics») and who asserts an asymmetry in the climate change domain that qualitatively elevates his own identity group over the out - group («realists»), asserting a cultural cognition bias in someone that he feels is identified with that out - group (without even an attempt to explain the basis for such a determination *), even those that person isn't asserting such a qualitative elevation of his own in - group.

The cultural cognition thesis is that people conform their perceptions of risk & like facts to the positions that predominate in their group — not that they conform fact or risk perceptions to ones that maintain or maximize polarization.

That's true of «cultural cognition» and like forms of motivated reasoning that figure in the tendency of people to fit their assessments of information — from scientific «data» to expository arguments to the positions of putative experts to (again!)

Konrad has made reasonable arguments in support of a single, consistent claim: that non-truth-seeking reasoning is not needed to explain the effects of cultural cognition, or at least that you haven't demonstrated such a need here.

I'd say it is clear that cultural cognition & like forms of motivated reasoning vary, if they do, only in degree in relatoin to «general intelligence» and that the variance is in the direction of people who are more intelligent being more prone to display it.

Actually, courts are in many respects way ahead of other institutions, in & out of government, in preparing themselves to play an intelligent role in managing the impact of cultural cognition on factfinding.

The study results suggest that cultural cognition or some like variant of motivated reasoning is driving «perception» of the images in the film.

If you get information from outside the echo chamber you will just interpret that information in such a way as to confirm biases.the cultural cognition project provides plenty of supporting evidence of this.

But a study by the Cultural Cognition Project (published in the Harvard Law Review) finds that perceptions of risk among persons who viewed the tape were highly conditional on those persons» cultural worCultural Cognition Project (published in the Harvard Law Review) finds that perceptions of risk among persons who viewed the tape were highly conditional on those persons» cultural worcultural worldviews.

It's consistent with a view that «facts» are just facts and clearly distinguishable — off in their own box, in «fact» — from ideology, that «evidence» is simply evidence, and that science is the one human endeavor immune to the influence of cultural cognition.

Along with her experience in filmmaking, writing, photography, and social media, Christina uses her expertise with languages, cultural cognition, and psychology to develop customized communications plans for diverse audiences.

To bounce off a comment I wrote downstairs... it seems to me that those who are most «adept» at avoiding polarization on scientific issues are those who are most thorough in employing basic tools of accurate «perspective taking,» which in turn largely reflects an explicit intent to employ tools that mitigate the influences of motivated reasoning and cultural cognition and identity - protective cognition.

From the paper:... Funding for research described in this paper was supplied by the Annenberg Public Policy Center in connection with the Annenberg / Cultural Cognition Project «Cognitive Adaptation Research Initiative,» and by the Skoll Global Threats Fund, in connection with the «Southeast Florida Evidence - based Science Communication Imitative.»

There does seem to be data, however, that show that the causality is tied in with cultural cognition.

Indeed, in their much — discussed research on «cultural cognition,» Dan Kahan and his colleagues suggest that public perceptions of climate change at least partly depend on the technological solutions proposed.

Seems to me that the basic principles of motivated reasoning, confirmation bias, cultural cognition, group - think, etc., illustrate how these patterns in how people reason apply w / o differentiation by ideological orientation.

A shift in the sample as a whole towards the answer of those with the high science comprehension scores is also predicted by my theory and cultural cognition.

I'm not sure how much the counter-intuitive or paradoxical juxtaposition you highlight really informs about the dynamics of how motivated reasoning and cultural cognition play out in the climate change / political proxy food fight.

In the talk, I present evidence from that study, but I also connect the two - channel strategy more systematically to a general model of how cultural cognition interacts with all manner of information processing.

It would be perfectly fine, in my view, for a communicator to use cultural cognition research to identify how to promote open - minded engagement with information on the HPV vaccine.

In your paradigm, our cultural cognition reduces this and makes such communication by humans more time and use effective than if we used the computer communication model.

IMO, the vast majority of the morality - hunting and motive - hunting that I see in the climate wars looks to me like the basic identity - aggressive and identity - defensive behaviors that are the manifestations of cultural cognition.

Cultural cognition is no shortcut; it is an integral component in the machinery of human rationality.

I think that is because you don't highlight the «uncertainties» when addressing the issue - in other words, you don't explicitly state from the outset that it really is unknown the precise degree to which cultural cognition would essentially render attempts to communicate opinion about the «consensus» irrelevant.

What we know about cultural cognition tells us much about how the formation of opinion in these issues is far more complicated than the simple mechanism you describe.

Cultural cognition refers to the tendency of people to conform their perceptions of risk and other policy - consequential facts to those that predominate in groups central to their identities.