These are the same
considerations in custody decisions as in civilian divorces, so the military service (including the demands of training schedules) is only one factor in determining custody.
As in custody decisions, the best interest of the child is the standard in determining how visitation should be arranged.
Neither the parent's gender or financial resources are
relevant in custody decisions — either parent may have primary custody regardless of these factors.
Mr. Speaker, these undersigned petitioners are drawing the attention of this House of Commons to the fact that children ordinarily thrive best when being raised by both parents, their father and their mother, even when those parents divorce, so the petitioners are calling on Parliament to amend the Divorce Act, as in my Bill C - 560, to require equal shared parenting to be treated as the rebuttable
presumption in custody decisions, except, of course, in cases of proven abuse or neglect.
'' [Potential child advocates] could perform a public function by lobbying for the replacement of the best interest of the child test with a more determinative substantive rule... as the substituted rule, I suggest the primary caretaker rule, which rewards past care and concern for children and minimizes the role and power of the helping
professionals in custody decision making.
Such attempts have devalued traditional «maternal» characteristics such as «nurturing,» in an effort not to give mothers (who are presumed to have such characteristics) an
advantage in custody decisions...» — Fineman, Martha and Anne Opie, «The Uses of Social Science Data in Legal Policymaking: Custody Determinations at Divorce,» Wisconsin Law Review, Vol.
In Missouri, joint legal custody allows both parents to equally
share in custody decision - making rights and responsibilities, including matters of education, health care and the child's general welfare.
Therefore, the petitioners are calling on Parliament to amend the Divorce Act, as in my Bill C - 560, to require that equal shared parenting be treated as the rebuttable
presumption in custody decisions, except in cases of proven abuse or neglect.
The section of the old statute that allowed judges to consider the physical proximity of the parents to each other as a factor
in their custody decisions is no longer Alabama law.
«One of the factors
in custody decisions is the ability to facilitate a close relationship between a child and his or her other parent, a scathing post on Cheaterville may be seen by a judge as antithetical to a child's best interest.»
The undersigned citizens of Canada call on Parliament to amend the Divorce Act as in MP Maurice Vellacott's bill, Bill C - 560, to require that equal parenting be treated as the rebuttable presumption
in custody decisions, except in the cases of proven neglect or abuse.
Many of my friends and colleagues who have seen the harm caused by mental health professionals in the custody court system want to eliminate any role for
them in custody decisions.