Sentences with phrase «in dangerous workplaces»

The decision demonstrates the importance of having a well - prepared fitness for duty policy and a proper alcohol and drug testing policy in place in dangerous workplaces, as well as the need to get legal advice before terminating workers for substance use.

The software is used by EHS professionals — doctors, nurses, safety and environmental professionals, and industrial hygienists employed by corporations — to protect workers by analyzing hazards in these dangerous workplaces.

Perhaps most importantly, the Court did not state that an employer can never impose random testing in a dangerous workplace.

Not exact matches

We've heard stories of 20 hour workdays, dangerous workplaces and, in the words of one lawyer hired to advise a reality shoot, «scary violations.»

Closely related to trauma relating to dangerous or frightening births is another type of trauma experienced in some hospital settings — horizontal violence (HV), or, as the British describe it, «workplace uncivility,» in which nursing or other co-workers are cruel to one another.

Also Tuesday, U.S. Rep. Kathleen Rice called on the Federal Railroad Administration to investigate workplace safety practices at the LIRR's rail freight contractor, after allegations in a lawsuit that New York & Atlantic Railway was having untrained and uncertified day laborers perform dangerous jobs on LIRR tracks.

«Incivility, left unchecked, may lead to more dangerous acts,» McFadyen said, «Research indicates that, while not all acts of incivility lead to violent acts, all violent acts in the workplace were preceded by acts of incivility.»

It's best to get to know the person over time and build trust slowly; giving people too much personal information can be dangerous in today's digital world, so avoid sharing details like your address, date of birth and workplace.

Coal mining is a dangerous occupation, with dozens of workplace accident deaths in the U.S. each year, on average.

Discrimination in the workplace creates an uncomfortable and potentially dangerous work environment for the targeted employee as well as other employees.

If you have suffered from an industrial illness as a result of exposure to asbestos or any other dangerous substance, or if you have suffered an accident in the workplace, contact our team of expert personal injury lawyers today to find out whether or not you could be entitled to compensation.

However, construction workers are not always responsible for dangerous workplace conditions in this industry.

We have secured significant jury verdicts and sizeable out - of - court settlements for injured individuals and their families in cases involving trucking and transportation accidents, dangerous and defective products, construction accidents, commercial plane crashes, explosions and burns caused by gas and electric power utilities, medical negligence, workplace catastrophes, and business disputes.

An injury resulting in a permanent inability to return to work can result from any number of accidents at work including a fall from a building or roof, the collapse of a trench, a motor vehicle accident, a heavy equipment mishap, or any other dangerous workplace exposure.

Her pregnancy was not an incapacity that prevented her from performing the work, it was the dangerous workplace, and that in turn triggered her statutory right to substitute that work with a safe task or withdraw.»

Whistleblowers are actually doing their part to keep the public safe from anything illegal or dangerous, which is why these laws are in place to protect those brave enough to come forward against workplace retaliation.

In 2014/15, the construction industry was the most dangerous industry to work in with 35 workers losing their life as a result of a workplace accidenIn 2014/15, the construction industry was the most dangerous industry to work in with 35 workers losing their life as a result of a workplace accidenin with 35 workers losing their life as a result of a workplace accident.

In a workplace that is dangerous, employers are generally entitled to test individual employees who occupy safety sensitive positions without having to show that alternative measures have been exhausted if there is «reasonable cause» to believe that the employee is impaired while on duty, where the employee has been directly involved in a workplace accident or significant incident, or where the employee is returning to work after treatment for substance abusIn a workplace that is dangerous, employers are generally entitled to test individual employees who occupy safety sensitive positions without having to show that alternative measures have been exhausted if there is «reasonable cause» to believe that the employee is impaired while on duty, where the employee has been directly involved in a workplace accident or significant incident, or where the employee is returning to work after treatment for substance abusin a workplace accident or significant incident, or where the employee is returning to work after treatment for substance abuse.

Employers with dangerous operations who wish to unilaterally impose random or pre-access drug and alcohol testing policies must establish that the workplace in question has unique problems and vulnerabilities associated with drug and alcohol abuse, and that their particular policies are justified under those circumstances.

Victims of defective auto products, bicycle accidents, workplace accidents such as a construction accident, as a result of a dangerous drug, or even those who have been involved in a dog attack, can trust that our legal team will stand by their side in every way possible to assist.

If you or a loved one have been injured or incurred property damage in an auto accident, truck accident, motorcycle accident, incidence of nursing home abuse, workplace accident, or by a defective product or dangerous property, our Orlando accident attorneys can help.

Although it may seem unusual to treat schools as dangerous workplaces, it is common and accepted practice in Quebec for pregnant teachers to withdraw from the workplace because of the risk of contracting harmful diseases from their students.

With our in - depth knowledge of federal and provincial legislation, we help clients maintain a safe workplace and prevent dangerous or costly mistakes.

Although there was no dispute that the workplace was a dangerous one, the Supreme Court determined that the simple fact that a workplace might be «highly safety sensitive» or «inherently dangerous» did not, in and of itself, justify the implementation of a random alcohol testing policy.

Industrial workplaces are considered inherently dangerous, and they can result in more serious injuries than other work sites.

In doing so, the Supreme Court overturned the New Brunswick Court of Appeal's decision that had concluded that an employer can implement a policy for mandatory random alcohol testing so long as (1) the workplace is «inherently dangerous», and (2) the policy only applies to individuals in safety sensitive positionIn doing so, the Supreme Court overturned the New Brunswick Court of Appeal's decision that had concluded that an employer can implement a policy for mandatory random alcohol testing so long as (1) the workplace is «inherently dangerous», and (2) the policy only applies to individuals in safety sensitive positionin safety sensitive positions.

Medication errors in a long - term care home may result in illness or fatalities, but does that make such workplaces dangerous?

The Supreme Court of Canada has concluded that a workplace policy which provides for random alcohol testing is not justified when there is an absence of evidence of an existing problem with alcohol use in the workplace, even where the workplace is considered inherently dangerous.

Some jobs are more dangerous than others, but employees in even the most dangerous occupations are entitled to a certain level of safety in the workplace.

Suddenly, you're one of those people you used to see on television, badly hurt in a car accident, by an 18 - wheeler or commercial truck, in a workplace accident, or by a dangerous product.

Burn injuries can occur from fires in the home, the workplace, or a motor vehicle, explosion injuries, dangerous chemicals, or spills of hot liquids.

In Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v Irving Pulp & Paper Ltd., («Irving Pulp & Paper») the Supreme Court ruled that a dangerous workplace was not sufficient grounds to justify a random drug and alcohol testing policy.

An industrial disease is a condition or illness caused by exposure to dangerous substances or unsafe conditions in the workplace.

The Alberta Court of Appeal held that such a policy «perceives that persons who use drugs at all are a safety risk in an already dangerous workplace» (at para. 34).

Falls are reported as being one of the most dangerous types of accidents in the workplace and in the home, and they have the potential to cause life - changing catastrophic injuries.

Arbitrators have found consistently that when a workplace is dangerous, an employer can test an individual employee if there is reasonable cause to believe that the employee was impaired while on duty, was involved in a workplace accident or incident, or was returning to work after treatment for substance abuse.

The Alberta case focuses on a «risk - based» approach in drug testing cases (rather than the «balancing approach» used in Irving) in which the focus is on the dangerous nature of the workplace and whether testing is rationally connected to a need to eliminate safety risks in a hazardous work environment.

Further, the Supreme Court noted that safety has never been held to justify random testing even in the case of «highly safety sensitive» or «inherently dangerous workplaces» such as railways and chemical plants or those that pose a risk of explosion in the absence of a «demonstrated problem with alcohol use in that workplace» (CEP at para 45).

Justice Abella did note that there may be dangerous workplaces where random drug testing may be justified if it is proportionate in view of both legitimate safety concerns and privacy interests.

Unsafe workplaces especially in dangerous professions like construction and manufacturing

The workplaces are inherently dangerous, involving such hazards as working with or around heavy equipment, including heavy haul trucks, cable and hydraulic shovels, high voltage power lines, radiation, chemicals, explosives, high temperature steam, high pressure piping, high pressure, flammable liquids and gases, and in blast zones.

While all workplaces have some risks, the construction industry is one of the most dangerous industries to work in.

Notwithstanding that, it is common ground that a term of imprisonment is necessary to adequately denounce Mr. Kazenelson «s conduct and to deter other persons with authority over workers in potentially dangerous workplaces from breaching the legal duty set forth in s. 217.1 of the Code to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm from befalling those workers.

With the advent of Ralph Nader and the consumer rights movement in the US in the 60s and 70s, the law began to turn against manufacturers and employers, and away from the traditional fatalist view that workplaces were inherently dangerous places.

In the absence of evidence of an existing workplace alcohol use problem, it concluded that a dangerous workplace was not, on its own, reason to implement such a policy.

In the absence of evidence of an existing workplace alcohol use problem, it concluded that a dangerous workplace was not, on its own, reason...

While the construction industry is one of the most dangerous industries to work in, all workers are entitled to a reasonably safe workplace.

Of course, if you're in a truly toxic or dangerous workplace, you might decide that it's not in your best interest to stick it out.

While try is the most dangerous word that an employee or job seeker can use in the workplace, there are certainly other danger words that also indicate negativity, uncertainty or controversy at work and can also doom your chances of getting (or keeping) a job.

Occupational Health and Safety Officer SEDONA COMPASS, Binghamton, NY (1/1995 to 6/2002) • Inspected workplace area and equipment to determine possible hazardous situations • Ascertained the workplaces conformed to organizational procedures and safety standards • Trained personnel to make good use of protective equipment such as hearing protection, dust masks, safety glasses and safety helmets • Oversaw the storage of dangerous materials such as chemicals • Identified and test workplaces for potential accident and health hazards such as toxic fumes and gas - air mixtures • Took corrective actions to ensure eradication of hazardous materials in the air