Randall Ryder represents consumers against debt collectors and defends consumers
in debt collection lawsuits.
I have a niche within a niche practice: I practice consumer law but I only represent consumers against abusive debt collectors and I defend consumers
in debt collection lawsuits.
Randall sues debt collectors that harass consumers, assists consumers with student loan issues, and defends consumers
in debt collection lawsuits.
I sue abusive debt collectors and defend consumers
in debt collection lawsuits.
I gave away a simple, easy - to - use template to help defendants
in debt collection lawsuits answer and serve discovery requests.
I only handle two types of cases: I represent consumers that have been harassed by debt collectors and I defend consumers
in debt collection lawsuits.
If you have been contacted by a debt collector or you are being sued
in a debt collection lawsuit, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) provides you with a variety of protections.
Below are some examples of real clients who I have helped
in debt collection lawsuit defense:
Not exact matches
Between 2009 and 2013 the firm filed more than 350,000
debt collection lawsuits in Georgia alone.
That included filing
lawsuits against grieving families and hiring
debt collection agencies to go after families who had recently lost their children
in tragic circumstances.
If your credit report includes bankruptcy, foreclosure,
debt collection lawsuits, garnishment, liens, and court judgements against you, your score is
in a world of hurt.
California's attorney general filed a
lawsuit against the schools and its subsidiaries (Heald, Everest College, and WyoTech)
in 2013 for a predatory scheme targeting low - income students, and the schools were accused of falsely advertising programs that didn't exist, misleading students about their credits transferring to Cal State, and engaging
in illegal
debt collection practices.
Your credit card issuer or a
collection agency can decide to file a
lawsuit — called a judgement — against you
in order to get collect on your
debt.
If you're getting
collection letters and phone calls or if you are the defendant
in a
collection lawsuit, it is certainly a sign that you have more
debt than you can handle.
If bankruptcy or debtor's court is not an option, or you are interested
in correcting your credit report, defending a
collection lawsuit, fighting back against abusive
debt collectors, or challenging mortgage company abuses, you will have the information you need to decide what to do next.
I will take you through how to respond to a
debt collection lawsuit in California and give you some real - life examples from my client
debt relief success stories of people who have successfully fought against
debt collection lawsuits and saved significant amounts of money.
If you have high
collection or credit card
debt that you would rather have us settle in order to save you the most money and protect you if lawsuits occur, then visit our Debt Settlement Service P
debt that you would rather have us settle
in order to save you the most money and protect you if
lawsuits occur, then visit our
Debt Settlement Service P
Debt Settlement Service Page.
From stopping unlawful
debt collection calls, to helping you get your loans out of default, to defending you
in a student loan
lawsuit, I have the experience to improve your situation.
But,
in a
lawsuit settlement with one of the biggest
debt collectors, the FTC lets the
debt collection industry know that collecting on expired, or time - barred
debts, is not ok.
Debt collection lawsuits are big business
in Minnesota.
Debt collection lawsuits are frequent
in the current economy.
Zombie
debt is that old bill that resurfaces
in the form of a
debt collection letter or
lawsuit long after you thought you'd buried it forever.
Just one
debt buyer — Midland Funding — has filed over 15,000
debt collection lawsuits in the last three years.
Other risks associated with not paying your creditors throughout the
debt settlement process include an increase
in the
collection efforts of your creditors and the likelihood of
lawsuits, judgments, and wage garnishments.
Student loan collector GC Services settled a
lawsuit that alleged it engaged
in unfair and unlawful
debt collection.
The irony is that bankruptcy will discharge this
debt quicker than
debt settlement, will not result
in a tax liability, will stop
collection activity and block
lawsuits.
The commenter recommended extending the look - back period to reflect these statutes of limitations and to ensure that PLUS borrowers with
debt that is delinquent, charged off, or
in collection, are able to either rehabilitate that
debt or avoid costly
lawsuits that may hinder their ability to repay a PLUS loan.
Let us assume you live
in Texas, you have not yet filed for bankruptcy, you just got a new job for the first time
in three years, you owe a credit union money for an unsecured loan of $ 7,500, you owe over $ 75,000
in credit card
debt, a
collection agency is currently threatening a
lawsuit against you, you have student loan payments due that are incurring interest, and you have back taxes due.
Debt settlement companies, in particular, seek to attract consumers by promising to reduce consumers» debts by 50 % or more, stop harassing collection calls from debt collectors, and prevent lawsu
Debt settlement companies,
in particular, seek to attract consumers by promising to reduce consumers»
debts by 50 % or more, stop harassing
collection calls from
debt collectors, and prevent lawsu
debt collectors, and prevent
lawsuits.
The primary consumer protection problem areas that have given rise to the States» actions include: (1) unsubstantiated claims of consumer savings; (2) deceptive representations about the length of time necessary to complete a
debt relief program; (3) misleading or failing to adequately inform consumers that they will be subject to continued
collection efforts, including
lawsuits, and that their account balances will increase due to extended nonpayment under the program; (4) deceptive disparagement of consumer credit counseling; (5) deceptive disparagement of bankruptcy as an alternative for debtors; (6) lack of screening and analysis to determine suitability of
debt relief programs for individual debtors; (7) the
collection of substantial up - front fees so the
debt relief company gains even if it fails to perform; (8) lack of transparency and information for consumers as to payment of fees, status of accounts, and communications with creditors; (9) significant delays
in active negotiation or engagement with creditors, coupled with prohibitions on direct consumer communications with creditors; and (10),
in the case of
debt settlement companies, basing savings claims (and settlement fees) not on the original account balance, but on the inflated amount due (including late fees and default rates of interest) at the time of settlement.
That's 26 % less than the
debt settlement company and the consumer would not have been
in default with their creditors and having to fend off
collections and
lawsuits.
The States, through their investigations and enforcement actions, have found that, through advertising and telemarketing, consumers may be led to believe
debt settlement is a relatively risk free process with little or no negative consequences, when
in fact consumers risk growing
debt, deteriorating credit scores,
collection actions, and
lawsuits that may lead to judgments and wage garnishments.
The senior has filed a
lawsuit against the
debt collection agency
in order to recover her hospital bill and $ 250,000
in punitive damages for the harassment of her by the
collection agent.
The
lawsuit also alleges that GC Services left voicemails that identified the consumer and indicated they were calling
in connection with
collection of a
debt.
In trying to collect a
debt,
collection agencies are prohibited from making false or misleading statements, threatening arrest or stating that a
lawsuit has been filed when one has not been filed.
Indeed, even while a consumer is enrolled
in a
debt relief program, creditors and
debt collectors may continue to make
collection calls pending resolution of the consumer's
debts and may proceed with
lawsuits and subsequent enforcement of any judgments, such as through garnishment of wages.
«Chase also made calculation errors when filing
debt collection lawsuits that sometimes resulted
in judgments against consumers for incorrect amounts.
Under his direction, LawX developed SoloSuit, an automated software that helps
debt collection defendants answer a
lawsuit in Utah.
About two - thirds of my practice is dedicated to consumer bankruptcy and the remaining third is devoted to representing defendants
in debt - buyer
collection lawsuits.
In spite of the increase in debt lawsuits, they account for just a tiny fraction of the 1 billion collection matters handled annually, the story say
In spite of the increase
in debt lawsuits, they account for just a tiny fraction of the 1 billion collection matters handled annually, the story say
in debt lawsuits, they account for just a tiny fraction of the 1 billion
collection matters handled annually, the story says.
«Foreclosure
in D.C. and Maryland,
debt collection lawsuits, correcting credit report errors, maximizing credit scores, dealing with harassing
debt collectors, and other consumer credit and
debt topics.»
We aggressively defend clients
in all types of
lawsuits, from complex litigation to relatively simple
debt collection matters.
In addition to
debt relief, filing bankruptcy can put a stop to foreclosure proceedings, wage garnishment,
lawsuits, creditor phone calls and
collection letters.
Our first experience with LawX produced a product called SoloSuit, which
in just over two months has been used by over 500 people to generate answers to
debt collection lawsuits in Utah.
If you are dealing with
debt collection abuse or a
debt collection lawsuit in Minnesota, contact consumer rights lawyer Randall Ryder.
The
lawsuit challenges the
collection costs charged to the GSEs, stating there is not a provision
in the Nevada Revised Statutes to permit HOAs to authorize third party
debt collectors to assess and charge the government owners, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.