Everyone who is a parent, as defined above (whether they are a resident or non-resident parent) has a right to participate
in decisions about a child's education and receive information about the child (even though, for day - to - day purposes, the school's main contact is likely to be a parent with whom the child lives on school days).
Wherever possible, involve your children
in decisions about child care arrangements because they will also have ideas about where they want to spend their time.
The bottom line is that the Florida Courts generally will give both parents shared responsibility, where each parent has a say
in decisions about the child.
In these determinations, parents participate equally
in decisions about the child's upbringing and welfare and split time equally in the child's day - to - day care, including a parent's right to have the child live with him or her.
Outcomes relating to child (ren): has desired level of access to child (ren) and contact with mother; considers himself part of a family unit; has a positive relationship with child (ren); is involved
in decisions about child (ren); can provide financial support for child (ren); has involvement in child (ren)'s future; is a positive role model for child (ren)
FATHERS MATTER A NEW project has been established by Family Rights Group to identify and address barriers that prevent fathers, whose children are involved with social services, to care for and be involved
in decisions about their children.
Offers parents involved in the criminal justice and child welfare system guidance on how to stay in touch with their children and stay involved
in decisions about their children's well - being.
Generally, the parents will share joint legal custody: this means that they both shall participate
in decisions about the children's medical and educational needs.
It gives families a stronger voice
in decisions about their children's care.
Not exact matches
If you have other
children, you need to think
about how your
decision to help one
child will affect the rest of the family, said Mitchell Kraus, financial advisor and owner at Capital Intelligence Associates
in Santa Monica, California.
One of the things I've done
in my work is kind of show the hypocrisy of progressive people who say they believe
in inequality, but when it comes to their individual choices
about where they're going to live and where they're going to send their
children, they make very different
decisions, and I just didn't want to do that.
A proactive estate strategy will place you — not state law or courts —
in control of
decisions about the care of your
children, your assets and your health care.
«Today Cardinal Dolan had the long - awaited opportunity to talk
about his
decision nine years ago
in Milwaukee to publicize the names of priests who had abused
children and how he responded to the tragedy of past clergy sexual abuse of minors, during the time he was privileged to serve as archbishop of Milwaukee,» Joseph Zwilling, a spokesman for the Archdiocese of New York, said
in a written statement.
In many cases, the
children about whom the
decisions are being made are too young to subscribe to the religious beliefs held by their parents, yet we continue to respect the parents beliefs.
By respecting equally the life of the unborn
child and the life of the mother, by supporting notification and consent before an abortion involving a minor, by offering ministries to reduce unintended pregnancy, by affirming (and encouraging church support of) crisis pregnancy centers, and by urging family counsel
in decision - making
about abortion, the additional language is decisively pro-life.
For while we argue
about stroller brands and family size, millions of women are engaged
in a different kind of mommy war, fighting with every
decision of every day for the very survival and future of their
children.
In it, the reader mentioned the fact that sometimes she felt insecure
about her
decision to pursue a family life before a career, explaining how challenging it can be to find time to write amidst the craziness of having young
children at home.
Episcopal mishandling of complaints
about clerical
child abuse, one of the main factors underpinning Benedict XVI's
decision to institute a visitation of the Irish Church
in 2012, is certainly a factor contributing to a sense of institutional fault.
A blanket moratorium on charter schools would limit Black students» access to some of the best schools
in America and deny Black parents the opportunity to make
decisions about what's best for their
children.»
Ms. Richards has been very clear
about her
child - focused strategy, disclosing that
in 2009 - 2010, Planned Parenthood «reached more than 1.1 million adolescents and parents... with information and education to help them make informed
decisions and stay safe.»
In sum, because it treats belief as an atomistic
decision taken piecemeal by individuals rather than a holistic response to family life, Nietzsche's madman and his offspring, secularization theory, appear to present an incomplete version of how some considerable portion of human beings actually come to think and behave
about things religious — not one by one and all on their own, but rather mediated through the elemental connections of husband, wife,
child, aunt, great - grandfather, and the rest.
What are they teaching
children about what it means to be human,
about decision - making,
about social roles,
about living
in the real world?
I want my
children to make
decisions for themselves
about faith and some of what was presented
in that film made me question if I was really allowing that.
Christian parents may be more understanding of the life - style of their
children if they realize that the world
in which their
children have come of age requires their
children to make
decisions about sexual behavior that were not even issues
in the past.
In judging
children for the sins of their parents, God is making wise and loving
decisions about how to treat
children based on the poor
decisions of their parents.
In addition to its broad target — reaching the entire congregation with a message that will help them understand alcoholism — the church has a number of more limited and strategic target groups: teen - agers and pre-teens who are making or are
about to make
decisions about alcohol; parents who are searching for ways to prepare their
children to cope constructively with alcohol and to avoid alcoholism; alcoholics and their families who need help but are afraid to come out of hiding (see Chapter 8).
The doctors increased the pressure behind the proposal by noting to the parents that a
decision had to be made promptly because a
child's sexual identity settles
in by
about age two or three.
The
decisions that a man makes
about where he will live, how he will furnish his home (the women's magazines, of course, will make this
decision in co-operation with the furniture manufacturers), how he will discipline his
children, what radio and TV commentators he will listen to, what newspapers and magazines he will subscribe to, and what organizations he will join
in his community — all of these daily
decisions are, to an inestimable but unquestionable degree, influenced by the legislation, education, and plain ballyhoo daily propagated by these groups and the power centers that control them.
Strategically placed near the checkout line at the grocery store, where, after a frustrating hour of
decision - making, calorie counting, list checking, and
child - bribing, women would otherwise be forced to stop, wait, and ask themselves a few questions
about the meaning of their existence, the magazine aisle dazzles us with photoshopped images of super-skinny models, next to impeccably arranged place settings, next to actresses praised for losing their baby weight
in five minutes, next to Martha Stewart holding a perfectly frosted chocolate cake.
Buckley bore the gravest moral objections to abortion, and he expressed his deep incredulity with the
decision: It seemed to betray, he thought, a flippant disregard for the facts known well to embryology
about the development of the
child in the womb.
A little later my dad came
in and sat down on the edge of the bed and said quietly that we should have a conversation
about Sunday Mass, and probably I was now old enough to make my own
decisions about attending Mass, that he and my mother did not think it right or fair to force that
decision on us
children, that we needed to find our own ways spiritually, and that while he and our mother very much hoped that we would walk
in the many rewarding paths of the Church, the final
decision there would be ours alone, each obeying his own conscience; that was only right and fair, and to decree attendance now would perhaps actually force us away from the very thing that he and my mother found to be the most nutritious spiritual food; so perhaps you and I and your mother can sit and discuss this later this afternoon, he said, and come to some amicable agreement.
athletes they serve,
in making informed
decisions about safety, and provide clarity on the steps that need to be taken to safeguard
children involved
in sport.
When Rahna Reiko Rizzuto wrote
about leaving her husband and two small
children in her 2010 memoir Hiroshima
in the Morning, she was vilified — even receiving death threats — for her
decision:
There is an emphasis throughout Supporting Families on supporting shared parenting, and it makes clear that from pregnancy onwards, all professionals should consider the needs and perspective of both parents — and should think
about how better to engage fathers
in all aspects of their
child's development and
decisions affecting their
child.
It should be noted that a natural father without PR still has certain legal rights
in relation to his
child, e.g.: • an automatic right to apply to the court for certain court orders
in respect to his
child •
in an emergency, the right to consent to medical treatment for the
child • if the
child is being looked after by the local authority, the right to have reasonable contact with his
child and the right for the local authority to give due consideration to his wishes and feelings
in relation to important
decisions they make
about the
child, including
decisions about adoption and contact arrangements after adoption.
You, however, are the expert on your
child and get to make your own
decisions about how to parent her
in a way that teaches her to be independent and accountable while also being loving and respectful of your
child and her needs.
In this article, we'll address the topic of baby led weaning safety and give you plenty of information to help you make an educated
decision about whether or not this process is right for you and your
child.
As a registered nurse and midwife, homebirthed mother of three, breastfeeding advocate,
In making
decisions about how to raise my
children I read widely, asked advice from a range of professionals, some being medical doctors some being highly trained, skilled midwives.
Generally speaking,
child guardians have legal custody and the right to make
decisions about the
children in their care.
Don't be shy
about asking these moms how they made the
decision to put their
child in Mom's Day Out.
In the end, it all comes back to education: In the ideal world, a parent's decision about whether to allow a child to start playing or continue playing collision sports before high school under current rules of play (which are evolving in the direction of safety, fortunately, as seen, for instance, in USA Hockey's ban on body checking at the Pee Wee hockey level and below, and limits on full - contact practices instituted at every level of football, from Pop Warner, to high school, college, and the NFL), will be a conscious one; a decision in which the risks of participating in a particular sport - provided it is based on the most up - to - date information about those risks and a consideration of other risk factors that might come into play for their child, such as pre-existing learning disabilities (e.g. ADHD), chronic health conditions (e.g., a history of history of multiple concussions or seizures, history of migraines), or a reckless and overly aggressive style of play - are balanced against the benefits to the child of participatin
In the end, it all comes back to education:
In the ideal world, a parent's decision about whether to allow a child to start playing or continue playing collision sports before high school under current rules of play (which are evolving in the direction of safety, fortunately, as seen, for instance, in USA Hockey's ban on body checking at the Pee Wee hockey level and below, and limits on full - contact practices instituted at every level of football, from Pop Warner, to high school, college, and the NFL), will be a conscious one; a decision in which the risks of participating in a particular sport - provided it is based on the most up - to - date information about those risks and a consideration of other risk factors that might come into play for their child, such as pre-existing learning disabilities (e.g. ADHD), chronic health conditions (e.g., a history of history of multiple concussions or seizures, history of migraines), or a reckless and overly aggressive style of play - are balanced against the benefits to the child of participatin
In the ideal world, a parent's
decision about whether to allow a
child to start playing or continue playing collision sports before high school under current rules of play (which are evolving
in the direction of safety, fortunately, as seen, for instance, in USA Hockey's ban on body checking at the Pee Wee hockey level and below, and limits on full - contact practices instituted at every level of football, from Pop Warner, to high school, college, and the NFL), will be a conscious one; a decision in which the risks of participating in a particular sport - provided it is based on the most up - to - date information about those risks and a consideration of other risk factors that might come into play for their child, such as pre-existing learning disabilities (e.g. ADHD), chronic health conditions (e.g., a history of history of multiple concussions or seizures, history of migraines), or a reckless and overly aggressive style of play - are balanced against the benefits to the child of participatin
in the direction of safety, fortunately, as seen, for instance,
in USA Hockey's ban on body checking at the Pee Wee hockey level and below, and limits on full - contact practices instituted at every level of football, from Pop Warner, to high school, college, and the NFL), will be a conscious one; a decision in which the risks of participating in a particular sport - provided it is based on the most up - to - date information about those risks and a consideration of other risk factors that might come into play for their child, such as pre-existing learning disabilities (e.g. ADHD), chronic health conditions (e.g., a history of history of multiple concussions or seizures, history of migraines), or a reckless and overly aggressive style of play - are balanced against the benefits to the child of participatin
in USA Hockey's ban on body checking at the Pee Wee hockey level and below, and limits on full - contact practices instituted at every level of football, from Pop Warner, to high school, college, and the NFL), will be a conscious one; a
decision in which the risks of participating in a particular sport - provided it is based on the most up - to - date information about those risks and a consideration of other risk factors that might come into play for their child, such as pre-existing learning disabilities (e.g. ADHD), chronic health conditions (e.g., a history of history of multiple concussions or seizures, history of migraines), or a reckless and overly aggressive style of play - are balanced against the benefits to the child of participatin
in which the risks of participating
in a particular sport - provided it is based on the most up - to - date information about those risks and a consideration of other risk factors that might come into play for their child, such as pre-existing learning disabilities (e.g. ADHD), chronic health conditions (e.g., a history of history of multiple concussions or seizures, history of migraines), or a reckless and overly aggressive style of play - are balanced against the benefits to the child of participatin
in a particular sport - provided it is based on the most up - to - date information
about those risks and a consideration of other risk factors that might come into play for their
child, such as pre-existing learning disabilities (e.g. ADHD), chronic health conditions (e.g., a history of history of multiple concussions or seizures, history of migraines), or a reckless and overly aggressive style of play - are balanced against the benefits to the
child of participating.
I mean this not only
in how we speak to our
children, but also how we speak
about them whether they are present or not, and how we speak to our own self or partner or mother
about parenting
decisions.
Understanding all the possible risks and benefits is a crucial step toward making the right
decision about anything you may change
in your
child's diet or lifestyle.
Poppendieck's point
about engaging
children in the
decision - making process is a well - established pedagogical rule.
It's important to know how much fluoride is
in your water supply so your
child's doctor can make the right
decision about fluoride for your baby.
As your
child gets older, they make more
decisions and
about more complex things, a five year old can make five
decisions in a day, what to wear to school (if they don't have a uniform), what to have
in his sandwiches, which friend to have home after school, whether to wash or dry the dishes, for example.
State divorce laws should also allow courts to factor
in spousal conduct when making
decisions about alimony,
child support, custody, and property division.
These benefits include but are not limited to the power of the human touch and presence, of being surrounded by supportive people of a family's own choosing, security
in birthing
in a familiar and comfortable environment of home, feeling less inhibited
in expressing unique responses to labor (such as making sounds, moving freely, adopting positions of comfort, being intimate with her partner, nursing a toddler, eating and drinking as needed and desired, expressing or practicing individual cultural, value and faith based rituals that enhance coping)-- all of which can lead to easier labors and births, not having to make a
decision about when to go to the hospital during labor (going too early can slow progress and increase use of the cascade of risky interventions, while going too late can be intensely uncomfortable or even lead to a risky unplanned birth en route), being able to choose how and when to include
children (who are making their own adjustments and are less challenged by a lengthy absence of their parents and excessive interruptions of family routines), enabling uninterrupted family boding and breastfeeding, huge cost savings for insurance companies and those without insurance, and increasing the likelihood of having a deeply empowering and profoundly positive, life changing pregnancy and birth experience.
And while letting your
child make a
decision about whether or not they want to be tickled may not have been the point of that particular study, it's still an example of an area where we should let our little ones voice their own opinions and maybe even more importantly, learn that only they are
in control of their own bodies.
Whether you're thinking
about enrolling your
child in a traditional public or private school, a DoDEA school or you're currently homeschooling your
child (or considering the possibility), there are many resources available to help you make informed
decisions about your
child's education.