If there's one big drawback to Freedom Planet, it's that it boasts a rather glaring inconsistency
in the difficulty between the levels and boss fights.
As it stands, the sudden spike
in difficulty between medium and advanced is pronounced.
Not exact matches
They might not be an obligation like contracts of employment, but they can still prove to be vital
in situations where the employer needs to assert itself or solve
difficulties between employees.
'' (The ongoing standoff
between the euro zone and Greece) also increases the chances of snap elections
in Greece as after overplaying his hand and facing increasing
difficulties in concluding the review, Tsipras may be tempted to cut his losses by calling early elections before Syriza (the ruling party) loses more support for adopting unpopular measures,» Piccoli said.
DISTINGUISHING
between employees and independent contractors is a constant concern for all business.The
difficulty in this area is that it does not matter what the contract says.
«We have changed our view of the
difficulties in bridging the gulf
between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon.»
In April, merger talks
between Orange and fellow French telecom Bouygues fell apart after billionaire Martin Bouygues balked at the terms laid out by the French government - backed Orange, while Bouygues was also concerned over the potential
difficulty of attaining antitrust approval.
He writes: «None of the
difficulties women
in Hollywood face are caused by the word «actress,» but they are the product of the language and thinking that creates and reinforces a false separation
between men and women — almost always to the detriment of women.
The CNGC's independent consultant attends and participates
in CNGC meetings at which executive compensation matters are considered, and performs analyses for the CNGC at the CNGC's request, including benchmarking, realizable pay analyses, analyses of the correlation
between performance measures and shareholder return, and assessments of the
difficulty of attaining performance goals.
We then calculate what the ratio would be if Amazon added 50,000 Amazon workers and 62,500 supplementary workers over a ten year period, as Amazon's RFP projects, and if the city's housing supply grew 20 percent faster than it did
in the earlier period.1 We adjusted the 20 percent figure up or down to reflect differences
in metros» level of
difficulty in producing new housing, and we assumed that vacancy rates would drop to
between 3 and 5 percent of the city's housing stock.
Borrowers with fair to average credit — which means they have credit scores
between 630 and 680 — will face more
difficulty in getting personal loans than borrowers with good credit.
«You need to allow the
difficulty to increase enough
between blocks to catch up to a sudden spike
in net hash, but not enough to accidentally send the
difficulty sky high when two miners get lucky and find blocks back to back.»
A new coalition government led by Chancellor Merkel still seemed the most likely outcome, although negotiations
between the various parties looked set to take some time, mainly due to the
difficulties of accommodating the opposing views of the junior partners
in the proposed coalition, the economically liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) and the Greens.
Clearly doing so is resulting
in continuing
difficulty between us here.
It is believed that the Mayas upset the balance
between humans and nature, although the fall of their civilization probably corresponded to «a network of interaction
in which any
difficulty could have had repercussions on the whole» (Fonseca Zamora, 505).
«The several
difficulties here discussed, namely our not finding
in the successive formations infinitely numerous transitional links
between the many species which now exist or have existed; the sudden manner
in which whole groups of species appear
in our European formations; the almost entire absence, as at present known, of fossiliferous formations beneath the Silurian strata, are all undoubtedly of the gravest nature.»
So there is a connection
between authoritarian leadership
in the church and the church's present
difficulty in distinguishing what is central to the gospel from what is not.
Anglicans and Ecumenism After centuries of «good and truly brotherly relations» things have got rough - there are «tangible
difficulties»,
in the diplomatic language of church statements -
between the Russian Orthodox Church and the churches of the Anglican Communion, and the Orthodox insist it's the Anglicans» fault.
«The excessive segmentation of knowledge, the rejection of metaphysics by the human sciences, the
difficulties encountered by dialogue
between science and theology are damaging not only to the development of knowledge, but also to the development of peoples, because these things make it harder to see the integral good of man
in its various dimensions.
I sometimes think that the
difficulties we now face
in controlling water, air, and soil pollution, and the undue dissemination of radioactive materials, are the result of a common impression that «the boundary
between life and non - life has all but disappeared.
One of these
difficulties comes from his conviction that there is a very sharp contradiction
between the despotic deity who as he thinks is dominant
in the Old Testament literature and the picture of a loving God taught and revealed by Jesus.
Thus contemporary theology is stalemated
between a longstanding affirmation which does not touch the lives of many, and an appreciation of the needs and aspirations of contemporary experience which has great
difficulty in being theological.
The
difficulty in explaining satisfactorily this balance
between the actuality of the constituent and that of the complex whole, has so often motivated metaphysical stances which (
in effect) attempt to deny it.
Apart from the
difficulty in identifying when a change is a «revolution» and when it isn't, the sharp contrast
between normal and revolutionary science has been questioned.
In the article, Harrison discusses such «difficulties» in the text as problems with chronologies, differences in numbers, non-parallel accounts in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4
In the article, Harrison discusses such «
difficulties»
in the text as problems with chronologies, differences in numbers, non-parallel accounts in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4
in the text as problems with chronologies, differences
in numbers, non-parallel accounts in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4
in numbers, non-parallel accounts
in the Gospels, the differences between John and the synoptics, and presumed error in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4
in the Gospels, the differences
between John and the synoptics, and presumed error
in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4
in the sources quoted (e. g.; Acts 7:4).
In continuing his pursuit of the truth, which carries with it a precise method of making the distinction
between the definitely true and the possibly false, he employs the triage of his second precept of Discourse on Method: «The second, to divide each of the
difficulties that I would examine as individual parcels, as much as it would be possible and required for a better resolution» (18).
In these he proposes a highly convincing readjustment of the old ideas of «matter» and «form», overcoming some of the difficulties inherent in the scholastic theory of a real distinction between the principles of «act» and «potency» as dual constituents of reality, especially in the light of modern scientific knowledg
In these he proposes a highly convincing readjustment of the old ideas of «matter» and «form», overcoming some of the
difficulties inherent
in the scholastic theory of a real distinction between the principles of «act» and «potency» as dual constituents of reality, especially in the light of modern scientific knowledg
in the scholastic theory of a real distinction
between the principles of «act» and «potency» as dual constituents of reality, especially
in the light of modern scientific knowledg
in the light of modern scientific knowledge.
When one carefully distinguishes
between the subjectivist bias and the subjectivist principle, it becomes apparent that the subjectivist bias is,
in and of itself,
in no way the cause of modem philosophical
difficulties.
The exegesis of this book is still beset with acute
difficulty; there exists no consensus as to its main purport, and, not least, the figure of the intermediary
between God and Job remains shrouded
in uncertainty.
It is, after all, the relation
between scientific theories and the official teaching of the Church that decides the question whether a scientist has
difficulties in being a Christian believer and a Catholic.
Needless to say, the paradox
between metaphysical monism and epistemological dualism
in much of modern science presents immense philosophical
difficulties.
One
difficulty grows out of the presence of something
in Jesus» teaching, namely, a certain strenuous and uncompromising quality; the other
difficulty grows out of the lack of something, namely, light on what particular choices should be made
between available alternatives
in many concrete situations.
The other problem arises out of the hermeneutical
difficulties in the interpretation of tradition and
in making the necessary distinction
between binding «Tradition» (with a capital T) and purely human «traditions.»
That is, given the distinction that I am making
between physicalism and materialism, the latter formulation would mean that «vacuous actualities,» devoid of experience, exert all the causal efficacy
in the world (which is one of the basic points that led Kim into insuperable
difficulties in affirming the reality of the mental).
It has become notorious, especially
in the Ecumenical Movement, that an understanding
between such divergent manifestations of Christianity is difficult and, indeed, often bound to fail.1 Ecumenical hermeneutics is an attempt to unveil the reasons for the apparent lack of agreement through the analysis of the divergent ways of understanding Scripture and its tradition, as well as for the
difficulty of mutual understanding
between Christians.
The gap
between evangelicals
in different polls can be baffling, given the
difficulty of defining evangelicals for polling purposes.
The modern
difficulty in understanding the Church's teaching on married sexuality stems
in large part from a failure to distinguish
between lust and what is (or should be) normal sexual desire, i.e.
between assertive and unregulated sexual desire, bent foremost on physical self - satisfaction, and simple sexual attraction, which can include a desire for union and is characterised by respect and regulated by love.
One who affirms a doctrine of apostolic succession culminating
in the authority of the bishop of Rome must not only choose
between succession of teaching or succession of office (as J. B. Lightfoot
in his own day understood), but also surmount the historiographical
difficulty posed by the early Church's transition from apostles to presbyters, and from presbyters to a single monarchical bishop.
I think he is under great
difficulty in giving an account of causation
in our normal sense of interaction
between different things, because he is obsessed with causation as the relation
between an earlier and later stage
in the same process.
In this review I hope to have lifted to attention some of the small categoreal difficulties that make all the difference in the world between mere metaphysical clarity and genuine philosophic wisdo
In this review I hope to have lifted to attention some of the small categoreal
difficulties that make all the difference
in the world between mere metaphysical clarity and genuine philosophic wisdo
in the world
between mere metaphysical clarity and genuine philosophic wisdom.
You are right to highlight the
difficulty in discerning
between saying this
in not OK and being abusive.
In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
In describing and accounting for the lives of the Religious Right, which we define simply as religious conservatives with a considerable involvement
in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in political activity, the book and the series tell the story primarily by focusing on leading episodes
in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in the movement's history, including, but not limited to, the groundwork laid by Billy Graham
in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in his relationships with presidents and other prominent political leaders; the resistance of evangelical and other Protestants to the candidacy of the Roman Catholic John F. Kennedy; the rise of what has been called the New Right out of the ashes of Barry Goldwater's defeat
in 1964; a battle over sex education in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in 1964; a battle over sex education
in Anaheim, California, in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in Anaheim, California,
in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in the mid-1960's; a prolonged cultural war over textbooks
in West Virginia in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in West Virginia
in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in the early 1970's — and that is a battle that has been fought less violently
in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in community after community all over the country; the thrill conservative Christians felt over the election of a «born - again» Christian to the Presidency
in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the difficulty the Religious Right has had in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in 1976 and the subsequent disappointment they experienced when they found out that Jimmy Carter was, of all things, a Democrat; the rise of the Moral Majority and its infatuation with Ronald Reagan; the
difficulty the Religious Right has had
in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship between religion and politics or, as we usually put it, between church and stat
in dealing with abortion, homosexuality and AIDS; Pat Robertson's bid for the presidency and his subsequent launching of the Christian Coalition; efforts by Dr. James Dobson and Gary Bauer to win a «civil war of values» by changing the culture at a deeper level than is represented by winning elections; and, finally, by addressing crucial questions about the appropriate relationship
between religion and politics or, as we usually put it,
between church and state.
The
difficulties with «strongly religious» colleges even today, much less
between 1870 and 1920, are sometimes buried
in Marsden's notes, as when he admits that academic due process is often absent from such schools and «dictatorial rule is particularly common.»
Informally I have some
difficulty in grasping the distinction
between:
Stapp's way of handling this
difficulty is to postulate (1) that the fundamental events of which the universe is composed are well - ordered as regards their coming into being (which, according to Stapp, is not the same as their being well - ordered with respect to measurable time) and (2) that the character of all events prior to any given event is available to it regardless of whether or not a light signal could traverse the distance
between them
in the time interval separating them.
Two
difficulties in particular stand
in the way of the acceptance of the tradition, the slowness and
difficulty with which it became established, and the difference
between the Synoptic and the Johannine portraits of Jesus.
One of the chief sources of
difficulty in our time is the common, uncritical acceptance of the dichotomy
between judgments of fact and judgments of value,
between so - called «objectivity» and «subjectivity.»
It is the fusion of these three elements
in his representation of Jesus» life and teaching that makes it a matter of the greatest
difficulty to distinguish
in any particular discourse
between what rests upon a deep understanding of the true meaning of Jesus» actual words and what is read into them
in the light both of experience and of preconceived ideas as what the Word of God should fittingly proclaim.
It is my deep conviction that one of the chief sources of
difficulty in our time is the common, uncritical acceptance of the foundational dichotomy
between judgments of fact and judgments of value,
between so - called «objectivity» and «subjectivity.»
The
difficulty was that the liberal critical scholar was engaged at one and the same time
in constructing a faith - image and reconstructing the historical image, the one as a believer and the other as a scholar, and this led to the confusion
between these two tasks to which Schweitzer,
in effect, pointed, and which was, indeed, unavoidable.