It is similar
in doctrine and practice to a conservative Presbyterian church but is independent of any denominational affiliation.
The question then becomes: To what extent does the missionary push orthodox boundaries (
in doctrine and practice) to present the gospel to a people group?
The notion of a homogeneous Church that looks exactly the same
in doctrine and practice from congregation to congregation, culture to culture, community to community, is unrealistic and unhelpful.
If there is anywhere a separation between the kingdoms of the sacred and the secular, it is
in the doctrine and practice of the Lord's Supper.
We must acknowledge the ever - present tendency to self - deceit, idolatry and institutional pride
in its doctrines and practices.
Don't you see that contradictions
in doctrine and practices really damages the Body of Christ?
Not exact matches
The Reformation introduce a wave of man - made false
doctrine (the most degenerate of all being Calvinism - TULIP) It is IMPOSSIBLE to be
in a church
and practice Christian faith.
Even though most students still identify themselves as Orthodox, many have limited grounding
in church
doctrine and practice.
For that reason i suggest people test the
doctrines and practices of a religion they are interested
in.
Others are even more adamant, however,
in saying that the Church can not change a
practice that is based on the
doctrine of Jesus, the apostles,
and centuries of authoritative teaching.
Most disagree with the
practices, interpretation
and doctrine of the other sects
and many consider anyone who isn't
in their particular church as «not true Christians».
And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false religious doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is pass
And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false religious
doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is pass
and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments people
in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting
in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.
The actual true
doctrine of Jesus could have been recorded
in some of the ruled out books
and practiced by groups of Christians that the stronger party
in Rome declared «heretic»
and stamped out long ago.
Right
doctrine and right church
practices, while important, do not
in and of themselves make a church a healthy community, or a faithful witness to the surrounding area.
The notion that
doctrine and pastoral
practice are
in conflict can not stand.
Madison's implicit assumption,
and that of the entire tradition of religious toleration until the last few decades, however, was that religious diversity
and conflict would involve competing sects that differ on some important questions of
doctrine and practice but nonetheless share
in common a basic Judeo - Christian orientation that is also,
in very broad terms, our society's implicit civil religion.
There is a profound wisdom
in these
doctrines,
and people have achieved a good deal of serenity by
practicing them.
The 1938 report
Doctrine in the Church of England says that «every individual ought to test his or her belief
in practice and, so far as his or her ability
and training allow, to think out his or her own belief
and to distinguish between what has been accepted on authority only
and what has been appropriated
in thought or experience».23 Such an emphasis has to allow for variety of belief
and view within the community.
There is a total confusion
in doctrine, a variety of
practice and a generalised belief that a general inculcation of «all things bright
and beautiful» is enough.
If Christians could come to see that we can not understand the saving work of God within us, the incarnation of God
in the world, the presence of the Holy Spirit, or the character of the Christian life apart from a
doctrine of mutual indwelling that is irreconcilable with atomistic individualism
and all its works, we could have powerful leverage to liberate us from oppressive canalizations of thought
and practice.
Quakers don't worry about
doctrines, but instead welcome anyone who wishes to engage
in the
practices of worship
and community with us.
Although its interest
in a credible
doctrine of God
and God's work
in the world was grounded
in existential
and ultimately practical concerns, the relation to
practice was little
and poorly articulated.
Specific
doctrines are tackled well — the section on the Mass is excellent, with a quote from Justin
in the second century chiming
in well with the author's words on the reality of Christ's presence
and the
practice of Eucharistic adoration.
He must learn more than ever before to bear his own responsibility within the concrete Church
and not
in a basic, though secret opposition to her,
and to cope also with the historical conditions of her
doctrine and practice in freely given obedience.
They are opposed to the use of force,
and although they are a bridge between Wahhabi
and Sufi
practices, they follow orthodox Sunni
doctrines, rather than the usual Sufi teachings,
and accept the school of Malik
in the particular requirements of religion.
If there is to be active commitment, then there must be some degree of intellectual understanding of what the faith involves,
and this
in turn means that the faith is expressed
in certain
practices and doctrines.
The danger is this, to put it bluntly, that many Christians are tempted to believe no longer
in the infallibility oi the Church's
doctrine and to make light oi its directives for the life
and practice of the individual as well as of the Church.
If
in relatively normal circumstances there is too great a gap between the theoretical morality of the Church
and what is actually
practiced even by good Catholics, the Church will have to ask herself whether she has really done all that was necessary as far as the working out of her
doctrine in pastoral
practice is concerned.
That a congregation's defining
practice of worship is a response «
in Jesus» name» implies study of that to which it is a response: Just how is God understood to be «present» is Jesus» ministry, crucifixion,
and resurrection appearances; what understanding of God follows from this; who is Jesus; what are the sources
and the warrants of these characterizations of Jesus
and of God (scripture, tradition, history of
doctrine); what understanding of these sources makes them not only sources but also authoritative for these understandings of God
and Jesus?
As an Evangelical Presbyterian Church, Warehouse 242 is by
doctrine and practice somewhere between the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), which is considered theologically liberal,
and the Presbyterian Church
in America, which broke off
in the early 1970s to maintain a more traditionalist approach.
According to the document «Towards Common Witness» some of the characteristics which distinguish proselytism from Christian witness are: unfair criticism of caricaturing of the
doctrines, beliefs
and practices of another church; presenting one's church or confession as «the true church»; the use of humanitarian aid, educational opportunities or moral
and psychological pressure, to induce people to change their affiliation; exploiting people's loneliness, even disillusionment with their own church
in order to «convert» them.
In recent years, however, certain West German theologians, notably Jürgen Moltmann, Heribert Mühlen,
and Eberhard Jüngel, have «rediscovered» the
doctrine of the Trinity as the basis for contemporary Christian belief
and practice.
Today, the predominate
doctrine taught
in what is called «church» today is that «you can
practice some sin,
and you surely shall not die.»
In these ways, the objections to the idea of truth as correspondence can be cleared away, and we can explicitly reaffirm this notion, which we all implicitly affirm in practice, and we can therefore reaffirm that the task of the theologian involves the attempt to formulate the Christian faith in true doctrines, and to defend the truth of these doctrines by showing them to be self - consistent, adequate to the facts of experience, and illuminatin
In these ways, the objections to the idea of truth as correspondence can be cleared away,
and we can explicitly reaffirm this notion, which we all implicitly affirm
in practice, and we can therefore reaffirm that the task of the theologian involves the attempt to formulate the Christian faith in true doctrines, and to defend the truth of these doctrines by showing them to be self - consistent, adequate to the facts of experience, and illuminatin
in practice,
and we can therefore reaffirm that the task of the theologian involves the attempt to formulate the Christian faith
in true doctrines, and to defend the truth of these doctrines by showing them to be self - consistent, adequate to the facts of experience, and illuminatin
in true
doctrines,
and to defend the truth of these
doctrines by showing them to be self - consistent, adequate to the facts of experience,
and illuminating.
The nineteenth century philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche shrewdly observed that
in his day the bourgeois elites of Europe wanted the fruit of Christianity (i.e., moral culture) without the tree itself (i.e., the actual
doctrine and practice).
All of this blue - chip evangelical clout is brought to bear
in support of the
doctrine of biblical «inerrancy» against a growing party of theological compatriots inclined to speak more of the «authority» of Scripture with regard to «faith
and practice.»
And yet, the changes inside the movement have been so great, and the practices, doctrines, and styles of Pentecostalism are so different, that the contribution of the 17 researchers in this book has been indispensable for my understanding of so complex an iss
And yet, the changes inside the movement have been so great,
and the practices, doctrines, and styles of Pentecostalism are so different, that the contribution of the 17 researchers in this book has been indispensable for my understanding of so complex an iss
and the
practices,
doctrines,
and styles of Pentecostalism are so different, that the contribution of the 17 researchers in this book has been indispensable for my understanding of so complex an iss
and styles of Pentecostalism are so different, that the contribution of the 17 researchers
in this book has been indispensable for my understanding of so complex an issue.
Since God, on this view, is contemporary with every finite actual entity, being neither
in the past nor
in the future of any other actual entity, God, on the principle
in question, would be able neither to prehend nor to he prehended by any other actual entity, a conclusion more radically at variance with religious experience
and practice than the
doctrine Whitehead was invoked to repair.
The expressions
and ideas
In the Odes clearly show that they belong to a period prior to any systematic development of Christian
doctrine and practice and they were the first attempt by a Christian community to express its new found faith.
The problem of chronological
and axiological priority of theory (myths, beliefs, ideas, concepts,
doctrines, dogmata)
and practice (worship, rites, ritual)
in religion was discussed by students of different religions
and civilizations (W. Robertson Smith, Andrew Lang, Wilhelm Schmidt, Otto Gruppe).
He recognizes that the
doctrine of retribution (so central to the wisdom tradition),
in which the righteous are rewarded
and the evil punished, does not always work out
in practice.
In complex religions, a great number of
doctrines, religious
practices and symbols are thought to point to the transcendent vision.
The secularization of the breast
in early modern Western Europe began a long process
in which Christianity came to be seen increasingly as focused on beliefs
and doctrines, while bodies
and physical
practices were marginalized.
More recently Cardinal Levada, Prefect of the Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith, who has made clear his desire to promote
and encourage «good
practice»
in the Church, has also added his appreciation.
Even though specific Christian beliefs were unknown
in Athens, Christian thinkers used resources which were far less internally consistent than process thought to express religious meanings, defend
practices,
doctrines,
and so forth.
We have become way too much eyeball people as Christians assume that those who don't live according to the way they do they are unsaved, we have created this judgemental relationship which hurts peoples fellowship with God, there are no litmus tests for people that believe
in Jesus, which is why we are called to not judge others,
and people use James 2:14,
and 1 John's verse of those who
practices righteousness are righteous even though I think it's talking about earthly righteousness toward people that we as Christians should show because there is a lost world out there that needs are help
and these
doctrines of guilt, condemnation, anger,
and judgement aren't helping
in fact they are doing the opposite, just like how
in James it's justification towards man.
That attitude fits with the message we are receiving more
and more that «feeling» something somehow is more pure
and perhaps, more «true» than having to fit
in with the
doctrine,
practices, rules
and observations of a formal institution that are handed down to us.
They still
practice a belief
in a god,
and practice a dogmatic
doctrine.
At least the
doctrine and practice of AE / Dalahast's nasty religion has shifted enough that they are no longer torturing
and threatening scientists who expose the Christian god fraud, or at least not as much as
in years past.
Some seek escape
in atheistic theory; more seek it
in religious
practices and doctrines.