Not exact matches
In fact, the more cast - iron you are with what you believe, as you seem to be by all the
dogmatic statements you have made, the easier it is for something to tip the balance and cause you to remove yourself.
Brown delighted this reviewer with his appreciation of the Psalter and would delight any right - minded Calvinist with his appreciation of Karl Barth's
statement in Church
Dogmatics IV, 2: as a poor man, writes Barth, Christ «shares as such the strange destiny which falls on God
in His people and the world — to be the One who is ignored and forgotten and despised and discounted by men.
On that basis it is conceivable that genuine «progress»
in dogmatic development
in the future will move, not so much
in the direction of a wider, more exact unfolding and precise definition of traditional dogma, but simply
in that of a more living, radical grasp and
statement of the ultimate fundamental dogmas themselves.
If this were simply a
dogmatic statement of the importance of relationships grounded
in Whitehead's doctrine of prehensions, we would all have to recognize the danger of moving
in this way from the metaphysics to the more concrete theory.
Before there was much speculation on the «nature» of the person and long before any
dogmatic statements about that nature were attempted, the members of the community knew that they stood at the great climacteric moment of all history, that
in and through the things which had happened among them and of which they were witnesses, God had visited and redeemed his people.
What man has written
in the past as his Scriptures and as his
dogmatic statements were expressions that more or less captured the experience of faith that was his at a particular moment
in time.
After all, «
in philosophical discussion, the merest hint of
dogmatic certainty as to finality of
statement is an exhibition of folly» (PR xiv).
Are you saying that we depend completely on God and
in His mercy alone, to bring about crisis for change or, is this yet another
dogmatic statement disguised as a question??? So, there's NOTHING I can do to change me....
Instead, by their
dogmatic statements about climate change and their policy advocacy, they have become just another group of lobbyists, having ceded the privilege traditionally afforded to dispassionate scientific reasoning to political activists
in the scientific professional societies.
Their own
Dogmatic Postulation of CO2CAGW «tenets», which
in effect constitute an instant litmus test for defining Believers as against «deniers», and their incessant repetition of
statements which publicly preach a Liturgy involving a coming Apocalypse, both contribute to bringing their Ideology very close to constituting at least some kind of Religion.