Participated
in Environmental Liabilities reserve program for the company and save the company several million dollars over a 15 year period.
They're carrying $ 21 mm
in environmental liabilities.
Expenses for other direct program expenses (excluding other transfer payments) could be $ 2 billion higher than estimated in Budget 2012, especially if the Government decides to book the shortfall
in the environmental liability as identified by the Commissioner for the Environment and Sustainable Development.
R (on the application of Seiont, Gwyrfai and Llyfni Anglers» Society) v Natural Resources Wales [2016] EWCA Civ 797 What is the meaning of «environmental damage»
in the Environmental Liability Directive (2004/35)?
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected
in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered
in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases
in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest
in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which we operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain
in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and
environmental laws and agency regulations, both
in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes
in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction
in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product
liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco
in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations
in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions
in the industries and markets
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate
in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations
in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand
in construction and
in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges
in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies
in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including
in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including
in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption
in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes
in political conditions
in the U.S. and other countries
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes
in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates
in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes
in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017),
environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations
in the U.S. and other countries
in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result
in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including
in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted
in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is
in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued
in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown
liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
People are afraid that there might be skeletons lurking
in the closet, which might take the form of
environmental liabilities, upcoming lawsuits, or even unpaid tax bills.»
An incremental $ 2.4 billion was «booked»
in 2012 - 13 for AECL's
environmental liabilities.
Martijn Wilder, Baker & McKenzie partner
in charge of global
environmental markets and climate change, said the firm hadn't done much climate litigation
in the past but the pace of inquiries from companies seeking reassurance about any potential
liability had quickened.
Or, as pointed out by the federal environment minister McKenna
in a letter Thursday to B.C. environment Minister George Heyman, that Canada already has a mountain of regulation to ensure a world - leading regime to transport oil and products, including: the Railway Safety Act, the Pipeline Safety Act, the National Energy Board Act, the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, the Marine
Liability Act, the Fisheries Act, the Canadian
Environmental Protection Act, 1999, and that Ottawa has pledged to spend an additional $ 1.5 billion to protect its coasts and marine environment.
For example, the results to date do not include the $ 2.4 billion, identified
in Budget 2013, for AECL
environmental liabilities.
Hagens Berman represents plaintiffs / victims
in securities and investment fraud, product
liability, tort, antitrust, consumer fraud, employment, whistleblower, intellectual property,
environmental and employee pension protection cases.
In Budget 2013, the Minister of Finance revised down the forecast for the deficit in 2012 - 13 marginally, from $ 26 billion to $ 25.9 billion... However, the revised estimate includes $ 2.4 billion for AECL environmental liabilitie
In Budget 2013, the Minister of Finance revised down the forecast for the deficit
in 2012 - 13 marginally, from $ 26 billion to $ 25.9 billion... However, the revised estimate includes $ 2.4 billion for AECL environmental liabilitie
in 2012 - 13 marginally, from $ 26 billion to $ 25.9 billion... However, the revised estimate includes $ 2.4 billion for AECL
environmental liabilities.
He thereby set the standard for
environmental legislation
in my country, and laid the foundations for the doctrines of enterprise
liability in American law.
Much of the focus
in due diligence is on the costs of remediation and future
environmental liabilities because one thing those firms don't like is uncertainties around unexpected law suits or big clean - up bills popping up
in the future.
Environmentally advanced technologies available
in Australasia are helping transform effluent from crops from an
environmental liability into a profit centre.
«(5) SUPERFUND SITE - The term «Superfund site» means a site included on the National Priorities List developed by the President
in accordance with section 105 (a)(8)(B) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9605 (a)(8)(B)-RRB-.
In addition, most of the units that have been sold were done so illegally to limited
liability companies and not to low - income families as they were supposed to be, according to Patsy Wooters, a Preserve Ramapo member and the 2010 winner of the Rockland County Executive's Outstanding
Environmental Volunteer Award.
In light of that,
environmental groups are furious about the failure of the Senate last year to increase the federally mandated total
liability that oil companies should have to pay for such disasters.
In a May ruling, the 2nd U.S Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said the attacks were an act of war, exempting defendants of liability under a law enacted in 1980 to deal with environmental and health risks caused by industrial pollutio
In a May ruling, the 2nd U.S Circuit Court of Appeals
in New York said the attacks were an act of war, exempting defendants of liability under a law enacted in 1980 to deal with environmental and health risks caused by industrial pollutio
in New York said the attacks were an act of war, exempting defendants of
liability under a law enacted
in 1980 to deal with environmental and health risks caused by industrial pollutio
in 1980 to deal with
environmental and health risks caused by industrial pollution.
But we are running out of environment — that is, out of the capacity of the environment to absorb energy's impacts without risk of intolerable disruption — and our heavy dependence on oil
in particular entails not only
environmental but also economic and political
liabilities.
Resource companies do sometimes turn out to have hidden
environmental liabilities, as do companies
in other sectors.
Investors should also consider any off - balance sheet or contingent
liabilities that might be incurred
in the course of an actual liquidation, such as plant closing and
environmental laws.
Property values could decrease because of overbuilding,
environmental liabilities, uninsured damages caused by natural disasters, a general decline
in the neighborhood, losses due to casualty or condemnation, increases
in property taxes, or changes
in zoning laws.
One of the reasons they put down so much salt is to prevent
liability in a slip - and - fall case,» says Ted Diers, administrator
in the Department of
Environmental Services» water division.
A chemical company
in Hunan province was compensated 11,000 yuan for an
environmental liability policy it bought from Ping An Insurance when chlorid gas leaked from its plants and poisoned vegetable fields of some 120 villagers.
Exxon and other fossil fuel companies could face «a huge universe of potential plaintiffs»
in civil
liability suits
in coming years, said Carroll Muffett, a lawyer who is president and CEO of the Center for International
Environmental Law, with offices
in Washington and Geneva.
In the case of a large office, for example, the combination of green design techniques and clever technology can not only reduce energy consumption and
environmental impact, but also reduce running costs, create a more pleasant working environment, improve employees» health and productivity, reduce legal
liability, and boost property values and rental returns.
The Rose Foundation for Communities & the Environment,
in Oakland, Calif., has already asked the SEC to mandate disclosure of financially significant
environmental liabilities.
The bill is likely to be a broad collection of provisions, including some
in response to the gulf spill that would increase the
liability caps on oil companies and impose tougher
environmental and safety rules on offshore drilling.
John has written before about how manure lagoons may become a
liability in a warming climate, but even now the practice of storing vast amounts of animal waste
in anaerobic lagoons is causing major
environmental concerns.
Within the Policy Brief, Lehr writes that the ten years following the establishment of the EPA
in 1971 he «helped write a significant number of legislative bills that were to make up a true safety net for our environment,» including, «Water Pollution Control Act (later renamed the Clean Water Act), Safe Drinking Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (which, surprisingly, covered deep mines as well), Clean Air Act, Federal Insecticide, Rodenticide, and Fungicide Act, and Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act (which we now know as Superfund).»
Jason Pettus is a civil litigation defense attorney with a strong litigation background through the representation of general contractors, subcontractors, owners, and design professionals
in the resolution of all manner of construction issues, including construction / design defect claims,
environmental claims and contractual disputes, catastrophic injury, premises
liability, and motor vehicle accidents
in both state and federal courts, as well as insurance coverage analysis, advisement of clients, and coverage litigation.
Environmental, Safety and Health We can aid you in the management of large - scale environmental liability and compliance issues, complex project siting and land development, and pub
Environmental, Safety and Health We can aid you
in the management of large - scale
environmental liability and compliance issues, complex project siting and land development, and pub
environmental liability and compliance issues, complex project siting and land development, and public advocacy.
Stephen has a broad civil litigation practice with extensive experience
in breach of trust claims, commercial disputes, construction liens, construction and
environmental liability claims, First Nations consultation rights
in land development, insurance coverage, product
liability, professional
liability and subrogation.
Lana Olson focuses her practice on complex, high - stakes litigation
in a variety of areas, including
environmental and toxic tort, product
liability, employment and catastrophic injury.
We advise business clients and insurers on pollution and other
environmental claims, and have extensive experience litigating claims under federal and state statutes
in clean - up cases, either defending against
liability and allocation among defendants, or seeking reimbursement for recovery costs from responsible parties.
John concentrates his practice on representing corporate clients
in tort defense, products
liability, mass torts, class actions, toxic torts, asbestos, litigation management, food
liability, professional
liability, pharmaceutical and medical device litigation,
environmental litigation, intellectual property litigation, construction defect litigation, general
liability, premises
liability, and business and insurance disputes.
His practice covers a range of litigation, including commercial, class action defense, product
liability, mass tort,
environmental, trade secret, insurance coverage, and real property title disputes
in state and federal courts.
Emma specializes
in civil litigation, focusing primarily on commercial litigation,
environmental claims, insurance law, real estate litigation, municipal
liability, product
liability and personal injury.
Steptoe's toxic tort litigation practice, which was recognized
in the 2014 and 2015 editions of The Legal 500 US for providing «exceptional skill and service,» defends toxic tort, product
liability and
environmental claims nationwide for the chemical, petrochemical, aerospace, manufacturing, and agricultural industries.
Lightfoot's attorneys have also assisted clients
in a variety of compliance matters and enforcement actions involving state and federal agencies, including matters under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act («RCRA»), Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act («CERCLA»), Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act («FIFRA»), Toxic Substances Control Act («TSCA»), Clean Water Act («CWA») and Clean Air Act («CAA»).
This decline might be due,
in part, to a decrease
in litigation filed under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund.
This recognition is limited only to lawyers who have won million dollar verdicts and / or settlements
in areas including personal injury, medical malpractice, product
liability,
environmental issues, employment litigation, and more.
Her practice includes the defense of product
liability actions, including those involving pharmaceutical and vehicular products, among others, the prosecution and defense of negligence actions, including malpractice actions, the defense of toxic tort and
environmental actions, the representation of creatives and entertainment companies
in contract negotiations, contractual disputes, and other disputes, and the representation of employers
in labor matters.
He has successfully represented clients
in matters involving hazardous substances, air and water quality, land use, toxic torts and other
environmental matters, including state and federal Superfund
liability, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting and compliance issues, California's Safe Drinking Water & Toxic Enforcement Act (Proposition 65) and hazardous waste regulatory issues.
Our trial consulting presentations have been instrumental
in the victory of patent cases,
environmental cases, product
liability, antitrust cases, white collar cases and countless types of cases.
We provide contract interpretation and coverage opinions, and litigate coverage disputes
in all areas including: commercial general
liability; property and casualty;
environmental risk; employment practices; cyber risk; life, health and disability; directors and officers; professional
liability; errors and omissions; contractual indemnity; and bad faith claims.
11:15 a.m. - noon — Significant Developments
in CERCLA Litigation An overview of 2014 court decisions and trends impacting
liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabi
liability under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and
LiabilityLiability Act.
We had more than 35 trials plus several arbitrations
in commercial cases, products
liability, IP,
environmental, and antitrust.