Sentences with phrase «in equitable distribution states»

Property division in divorce can be difficult to understand in equitable distribution states because there are few hard and fast rules.

In equitable distribution states, where judges have the right to distribute property in a way they think is fair, your spouse will now receive a portion of your inheritance.

Even in equitable distribution states where judges don't necessarily have to divide marital property 50/50, they rarely stray very far from that equation.

Courts in equitable distribution states are not obligated to divide marital property or debts 50/50.

Separate property is not usually subject to division in equitable distribution states.

In equitable distribution states, courts use factors established by state laws to make distributions of marital property.

In equitable distribution states, judges may stray from a 50/50 split when they believe circumstances warrant it.

In equitable distribution states, the idea of a «fiduciary relationship» between spouses has been applied only in the context of disclosing assets during the negotiation of antenuptial or property settlement agreements.

In equitable distribution states like Florida, for example, a prenup should outline how the business would be divided based on how much each spouse is involved.

In an equitable distribution state, debts in one spouse's name are his or hers alone.

If you live in an equitable distribution state, the court will consider a number of factors in deciding how to distribute the debt.

If you live in an equitable distribution state, you will have to split your marital property «equitably,» which essentially means, fairly.

Not exact matches

If you want to see a more equitable distribution of income in the United States — tax the churches like the private companies they are organized like and see what happens.

The attractiveness of socialism lies in its approach to distribution, as opposed to its effectiveness at production, and in its stated underlying principles — that is, socialism is not supposed to be based on our self - interest but on the principles of providing for everyone, of distributing the wealth in an equitable manner.

This is certainly obvious in terms of widening the area of human co-operation — in uniting families into peaceful communities with equitable distribution of responsibilities and privileges, and then creating from these the larger communities of states and nations, and finally developing from these a world society dedicated to the fullest realization of every member of the human family.

The NLC president said since he believed in the equitable distribution of the nation's wealth, he would not subscribe to an arrangement where 10 per cent corner 90 per cent of a state's the resources.

Some have argued that the legal basis for this mandate can be found in section 1111 (a)(8), the so - called «equitable teacher distribution» requirement, which asks states to submit plans to the Secretary that describe «steps that the State educational agency will take to ensure that poor and minority children are not taught at higher rates than other children by inexperienced, unqualified, or out - of - field teachers, and the measures that the State educational agency will use to evaluate and publicly report the progress of the State educational agency with respect to such steps.»

Since it may take a couple of years for states and districts to follow the department's urging and set up systems that will allow them to measure teacher effectiveness based on growth in student achievement, she said, states should be required to show that they are making good on the language about equitable distribution of teachers that's already in the No Child Left Behind Act.

Designed to identify the level of funding needed to deliver an adequate education to every student in a state and sensitive to each child's needs, the Evidenced Based Model ensures that the distribution of education funding is equitable, and accounts for the cost of overcoming «at risk» factors.

In the rest, referred to as common law states, courts must determine an equitable distribution of the spouses» property between them.

FL&NY are Equitable Distribution states, because their marriage laws developed from English Common Law and they have adopted new laws in the twentieth century to ensure equitable division of property acquired during marriage.

Unless a fair and reasonable division of property can be agreed upon, Oregon law states that a couple must divide their property under the principle of equitable distribution in a divorce.

Pennsylvania is an «equitable distribution state» meaning that on request of either spouse the court will work to fairly divide the marital property between both spouses in a divorce, and this is done without consideration to marital misconduct by either spouse.

In the state of Florida, marital property is divided through the process of equitable distribution.

In an «equitable distribution» state the court «equitably divides» the marital property.

In an «equitable distribution» state, all property acquired during the marriage is «marital property» and all property owned before the marriage is «non-marital» property.

The main difference between community property and equitable distribution is that in community property states there is an absolute 50 - 50 split of all property acquired during the «marital enterprise.»

In the state of New York, property is divided based on «equitable distribution» principles.

If you are getting a divorce in Massachusetts, it's important to understand that Massachusetts is an equitable distribution state.

equitable distribution: The way marital property must be divided by law in New York State in a divorce.

Liability for a spouse's debts depends on whether the divorce happens in a community property or equitable distribution state.

This is true in both equitable distribution and community property states, because your incomes, earned while you're married, are marital property in all jurisdictions.

A divorce decree or judgment will state in writing the terms of the equitable distribution and both spouses will be bound by those terms.

Most states are «equitable distribution» states, meaning the courts in these states split marital property in a manner that is deemed fair.

In both equitable distribution and community property states, the court can remedy the dissipation by awarding a greater share of property or cash to the innocent spouse.

However, Texas is unique in that courts are required to divide property in a manner that is «just and right» after evaluating several factors — just like equitable distribution states — meaning spouses might end up with an unequal division.

Financial Situation — In regards to property, Florida is an «equitable distribution» state.

When it comes to property division in divorce, Oregon is an equitable distribution state, which means Oregon courts distribute marital property equitably — but not necessarily equally — between the spouses.

An equitable distribution state, Pennsylvania requires that courts divide marital property in a way that is fair and equitable.

However, because Florida is an equitable distribution state, a judge may then take other factors into consideration, and those factors might result in something closer to a 60/40 split.

However, under the equitable distribution system followed by a majority of states, marital property is divided between spouses based on what is fair and just under the circumstances, which may result in an uneven split.

Since Oklahoma is an «equitable distribution» state, one of the functions of the court is to divide your marital property in a just and equitable manner when you can not agree, though the court's distribution may not be exactly equal.

Whether you live in a community property or equitable distribution state, the process for enforcing the property divisions of your divorce decree is the same.

In the 41 other states, the courts divide marital property and debt under the concept of equitable distribution.

In both community property and equitable distribution states, the judge will only divide marital property, which is property acquired by spouses from the wedding day forward.

Since Arkansas is an equitable distribution state, all marital property will be divided in a fair fashion according to the court unless agreed to otherwise by the divorcing spouses.

Ohio is an equitable distribution state, meaning that courts split your marital property in a manner that is intended to be fair and just, based on factors set forth in state law.

States follow one of two distribution schemes when dividing property in divorce: community property and equitable distribution.

It is an equitable distribution state, so all assets are divided between spouses in a way the judge deems fair.

During divorce proceedings, Colorado courts follow the guidelines set out in state law for equitable distribution when dividing marital property.