Indeed, we all shall give account to God someday; some will have everlasting life, and others will remain
in eternal death.
Whence does it happen that Adam's fall irremediably involved so many peoples, together with their infant offspring,
in eternal death unless because it so pleased God?
Not exact matches
Before the «Dispensation of Grace» of God, by which we are saved through «Faith
in Jesus Christ» as Lord and our personal Savior, Jesus Christ fulfilled the «Law of God» on our behalf during His ministry on earth, died on the «Holy Cross» for the «Remission of Our Sins» once and for all, descended to hell and defeated
death, then rose from the dead on the third day bringing us «
Eternal Life» and «Reconciliation» with God the Father!
In so doing, he has appeased His Holiness, Justice, and Wrath; He has conquered the enemy that we brought into the world by our rebellion, which is death itself, by rising from the dead and living and reigning as victorious King and Savior; and He has reconciled those who believe in Him to Himself that they may live life eternal with Him at the consummation of all perfection, for perfection will be restored as He has promise
In so doing, he has appeased His Holiness, Justice, and Wrath; He has conquered the enemy that we brought into the world by our rebellion, which is
death itself, by rising from the dead and living and reigning as victorious King and Savior; and He has reconciled those who believe
in Him to Himself that they may live life eternal with Him at the consummation of all perfection, for perfection will be restored as He has promise
in Him to Himself that they may live life
eternal with Him at the consummation of all perfection, for perfection will be restored as He has promised!
Is there a step of faith
in believing that Jesus is the Son of God and that He came and died for a sinner like me and that He rose again to prove that He is God and that He defeated Satan, sin and
death and has given
eternal life to all who believe
in Him?
We need no threat of
death or
eternal torture from a magical sky - daddy
in order to do the right thing.
In His case he comes up in the second resurrection with all the rest of the lost, only to recieve the wages of sin which is eternal deat
In His case he comes up
in the second resurrection with all the rest of the lost, only to recieve the wages of sin which is eternal deat
in the second resurrection with all the rest of the lost, only to recieve the wages of sin which is
eternal death.
To have grain and have it «more abundantly» decalres rather outrightly that there are many «grain» therefore for Christ to say that we «might have [it] more abundantly» declares without much doubt that we become
eternal in the Life /
death Life /
death struggles throughout eternity.
Are you loving Jesus Christ by telling people they will be «guilty of
death in eternal hell»?
But where sin abounded, grace abounded much more, 21 so that as sin reigned
in death, even so grace might reign through righteousness to
eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Then they will understand that physical
death is the beginning of
eternal life
in paradise.
- turn from sin and believe
in the
death for our sins burial and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ and you shall have
eternal life
in heaven!
This gets crazier and crazier and Christians still ~ * believe * ~
in eternal life after
death, zombie messiahs, moral shades of gray bundled
in with loose and literal biblical interpretations... how do Christian's «brains» still function?
Apparently you just ignored the whole point that there is a difference between the concepts of «immortality», where everyone will be resurrected and become immortal no matter who you are since physical
death came abut through Adam and the fall, and «
eternal life», which is living with God or
in other words it deals with the quality of that immortal life.
While an admonition such as «Remember, O man, that thou art dust, and to dust thou shalt return» sounds like the solemn - admonitory, the point of the memento mori is to contemplate worldly
death in order to fit oneself for otherworldly life
in communion with other
eternal souls, not somehow to find comfort
in the commonality of our mortal lot.
The end result
in Atheism is either
death or
eternal mortality, conquering the universe and knowing everything as a part of a hive - mind.
Isnt that the same as
eternal if you don't believe
in life after
death?
Death is pretty much the last frontier, which is why I think christianity with it's promise of
eternal life has such a toehold
in the western psyche.
It has got away for so long with the kind of lunatic word - games that allow
death - by - torture to be presented as an act of love, and
eternal torment
in the flames of hell to be seen as a necessary act of justice, that we should perhaps not be surprised that it has also managed to dupe its followers into seeing the systematic suppression and silencing of women as an act of liberation and equality.
Generally, they include the following
in their gospel definition: - human sinfulness - the deity of Jesus - the
death of Jesus on the cross for our sins - the resurrection of Jesus - the necessity of faith
in Jesus to receive
eternal life
In each chapter, DeYoung addresses the most noteworthy, and often most controversial, emergent theological viewpoints, hitting on such issues as scriptural authority, inaugurated eschatology,
eternal damnation, and Jesus's
death and resurrection.
To believe
in Jesus for your salvation and to have a part
in His everlasting Kingdom where sin,
death, sorrow, pain, despair, oppression do not exist, and
in this life have a moral code that includes loving everyone though not participating
in sin and have that hope of
eternal life.
20 Now the law came
in to increase the trespass, but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more, 21 so that, as sin reigned
in death, grace also might reign through righteousness leading to
eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Jeremy
in theory
eternal life i believe can not be discarded once given there are two choices to enter into Gods kingdom or to reject God and be thrown into the lake of fire.The same consequences are
in effect now when we choose God we choose life when we choose sin we suffer the consequences of
death to our body soul and spirit.But the choice is always ours.brentnz
But this passage is not talking about how to receive
eternal life, but is instead talking about how God rescued us from our enslavement to the sin of
death and showed us a new way of life
in Jesus Christ.
So you see Keith you are special created for a purpose
in this stage of transit test life... as true life is the
eternal life that which comes after
death on resurrection and Judgment day... God Bless
Victory over
death has been won for us by Christ on the cross: «
In the context of Christian faith, the drama of evolution merges inseparably with the (abysmal) death and (grounding) resurrection of Jesus and, in him, with the eternal drama that is the Trinitarian life of God.&raqu
In the context of Christian faith, the drama of evolution merges inseparably with the (abysmal)
death and (grounding) resurrection of Jesus and,
in him, with the eternal drama that is the Trinitarian life of God.&raqu
in him, with the
eternal drama that is the Trinitarian life of God.»
well, the New Testament is wonderful to read and learn from and Jesus
in the Bible teaches how to get
eternal life, life after
death.
23 For the wages of sin is
death, but the free gift of God is
eternal life
in Christ Jesus our Lord.
His
death covers all the sins we committed before we believed
in Jesus for
eternal life and after we believed
in Jesus for
eternal life.
Where the difference comes
in is
in the potential for an
eternal life after
death.
The
death of Christ is of no value to you if you don't believe
in Jesus for
eternal life.
While the
death and resurrection of Jesus are central to the Gospel, believing
in the resurrection of Jesus is not required for a person to receive
eternal life from Jesus.
The
death and resurrection of Jesus are definitely part of what we share
in evangelism, but we tell them these things to convince and persuade them to believe
in Jesus for
eternal life, not because they get
eternal life by believing
in the
death and resurrection of Jesus.
After all, there are many who believe
in the
death and resurrection of Jesus, but don't believe
in Him for
eternal life.
The answer to that question is the answer to this question: «Did Peter and the other apostles believe
in the
death and resurrection of Jesus when they beleived
in Him for
eternal life?»
In Nietzsche, we have witnessed the deepest willing of the
death of God pass into the deepest affirmation of
Eternal Recurrence.
I don't disagree (if I am understanding you correctly), but we must make sure we understand the difference between how to receive
eternal life (believe
in Jesus Christ alone for it), and the logical and theological foundations for that truth (deity of Jesus,
death and resurrection of Jesus, sinfulness of humanity, etc., etc., etc.).
So, right here,
in Scripture, we have examples of people who did not believe
in the
death and resurrection of Jesus, but who did have
eternal life because they believed
in Jesus for it.
The panel question was: «Is explicit belief
in Jesus»
death and resurrection necessary for
eternal salvation?»
God nbever punshed children for their parents crimes...
death isnot always a punishment... cause the ultimate punishment is
eternal life
in hell... you are looking at wrong perspective there here and now
in a temporary world
Death is the absence of
eternal life and
eternal life is only that which exists
in Christ (
in the presence of God).
If I am to be convinced that belief
in the
death and resurrection of Jesus are necessary today to receive
eternal life, those are the questions I need answered.
Through Nietzsche's vision of
Eternal Recurrence we can sense the ecstatic liberation occasioned by the collapse of the transcendence of Being, by the
death of God — and we may witness a similar ecstasy
in Rilke and Proust; and, from Nietzsche's portrait of Jesus, theology must learn of the power of an eschatological faith that can liberate the contemporary believer from the inescapable reality of history.
There is a difference between the mechanism of justification (the
death and resurrection of Jesus, along with a myriad of other things) and the message of
eternal life (believe
in Jesus for it).
Only so is God able, through sharing our human flesh
in the Incarnation, to impart
eternal life to that flesh, rather than succumbing to our
death and being extinguished by it.
If a person must believe
in the
death and resurrection of Jesus, must they believe that Jesus rose
in a glorified,
eternal, incorruptible body, and that He went on to ascend into heaven, or can they believe that He went on to live, grow old, and die again of old age like the others who were resurrected
in Scripture?
I have not yet seen an explanation on how Peter and the apostles could have
eternal life without believing
in the
death and resurrection of Jesus, but how today we must believe it.
He said that he always talks about the
death and resurrection, but that if someone believed
in Jesus for
eternal life before he had the chance to tell them about the
death and resurrection, he thought they would probably go to heaven, but wasn't sure.
If they believe that Jesus Christ died on the cross for the sins of all mankind, and if they believe that three days after his
death, Jesus Christ rose from the dead and if they believe all of these things, but don't believe
in Jesus for
eternal life, that person is not saved.