This article evaluates the tensions with democratic education inherent
in the federal School Improvement Grant program's market - based school reforms.
The options allowed in the California law are the same as those provided
in the federal School Improvement Grant program.
In the midst of such privation, School 4 is in its second year of getting an extra $ 2 million
in federal School Improvement Grant money on top of a roughly $ 4 million budget.
DECEMBER: The New York City district and union lose out on $ 60 million
in federal School Improvement Grant funding after failing to reach agreements on teacher - evaluation details.
The narrow and disruptive range of options offered in the Parent Empowerment Act — the same options offered
in the federal School Improvement Grant program — have shown no overall success in improving schools nationwide.
Schools Chancellor Dennis M. Walcott and UFT President Michael Mulgrew on July 15 announced an important agreement that will help secure up to $ 65 million over the next two years
in federal School Improvement Grants, a U.S. Department of Education program that provides funding to help transform our nation's struggling schools.
The agreement will qualify the city to receive up to $ 65 million
in federal School Improvement Grants over the next two years.
Education Week, the Education Writers Association and The Hechinger Report partnered with 18 news outlets in 16 states to investigate how $ 3 billion
in federal School Improvement Grants are being used to revitalize some of the nation's lowest - performing schools.
At issue is roughly $ 1.3 million
in federal School Improvement Grants, money earmarked for turnaround efforts that the schools received last year.
Not exact matches
Contract impasses
in 10 districts around the state prompted King to yank
federal «
School Improvement Grants.»
Under the terms of
federal School Improvement Grants that the DOE was awarded to help these schools succeed, the school district and the union must jointly develop a teacher evaluation system in low - achieving schools that receive the
School Improvement Grants that the DOE was awarded to help these
schools succeed, the
school district and the union must jointly develop a teacher evaluation system in low - achieving schools that receive the
school district and the union must jointly develop a teacher evaluation system
in low - achieving
schools that receive the funds.
«The mayor seems to be lost
in his own fantasy world of education, the one where reality doesn't apply,» declared UFT President Michael Mulgrew
in response to the mayor's State of the City speech on Jan. 12,
in which, among other proposals, he threatened to fire half the staffs
in 33
schools receiving
federal School Improvement Grant support.
The negotiations, which both sides agreed to
in writing, were aimed at creating a system for fairly evaluating teachers, using both student performance and observation,
in the 33
schools receiving
federal school improvement grants.
The city DOE and United Federation of Teachers had spent weeks
in closed door meetings trying to hammer out the details of a «meaningful teacher evaluation system»
in order to qualify for up to $ 65 million
in federal funding
in School Improvement Grants over the next two years, which is distributed by the state.
In the past,
school improvement grant money had come with little to no strong direction from the
federal government, and never with so much funding attached.
In 2009, the
federal government overhauled the Title I
School Improvement Grant program, increased its value to $ 3.5 billion with money from the recovery act, and spelled out four turnaround options from which perennially failing
schools would have to choose to get a share of the funding.
Data released Thursday by the U.S. Department of Education on the $ 3.5 billion
School Improvement Grant program show that the federal turnaround grants haven't just gone to schools in urban areas, or for less - drastic school improvement ef
School Improvement Grant program show that the federal turnaround grants haven't just gone to schools in urban areas, or for less - drastic school improveme
Improvement Grant program show that the
federal turnaround
grants haven't just gone to
schools in urban areas, or for less - drastic
school improvement ef
school improvementimprovement efforts.
It's how you end up with exciting victories like the
federal School Improvement Grant program, the Common Core, or teacher evaluation reform, that look a lot less victorious
in hindsight.
Two years
in, the
federal School Improvement Grant program shows momentum, but sustaining gains may be a challenge.
The city announced
in June, prior to the appellate ruling, that it was going to «transform» 11 of the district's
schools and dramatically overhaul or close 23 others under a $ 300 million
federal School Improvement Grant (SIG) program.
Under the Obama administration, the
federal government spent over $ 7 billion
in an effort to turnaround failing
schools via the
School Improvement Grant (SIG) program.
NCLB requires states to set aside about $ 230 million of their
federal funds for
grants to
schools in need of
improvement.
If, for example, one - third of all
schools found themselves «
in need of
improvement,» then the minimum amount of
federal support required to fund
grants of $ 50,000 per
school would be $ 1.6 billion.
-- and $ 3.5 billion
in designated
federal funding for
School Improvement Grants is enough to push many an edu - reformer to the brink of hubris, it's fairly clear that no one actually knows what to do.
The latest study of the
federal School Improvement Grant (SIG) program appears to confirm Smarick's view, which he declared with chest - beating glee
in a post on the EdNext blog.
Michael J. Petrilli is associate assistant deputy secretary
in the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Innovation and
Improvement, which houses the
federal charter -
school grant programs.
«Research clearly shows that no
school improvement effort can succeed without effective leadership, and such leadership is needed at all levels -
federal, state, district, and
school -
in our current systems and
in the systems we will create
in the future,» said M. Christine DeVita, president of The Wallace Foundation, which provided a $ 10 - million
grant to support the effort.
The third special report, Changing the
School Climate is the First Step to Reform in Many Schools with Federal Improvement Grants, examines the positive changes in school climate experienced by six case study schools that received the federal grants in Idaho, Maryland, and Mic
School Climate is the First Step to Reform
in Many
Schools with Federal Improvement Grants, examines the positive changes in school climate experienced by six case study schools that received the federal grants in Idaho, Maryland, and Mi
Schools with
Federal Improvement Grants, examines the positive changes in school climate experienced by six case study schools that received the federal grants in Idaho, Maryland, and Mi
Federal Improvement Grants, examines the positive changes in school climate experienced by six case study schools that received the federal grants in Idaho, Maryland, and Mic
Grants, examines the positive changes
in school climate experienced by six case study schools that received the federal grants in Idaho, Maryland, and Mic
school climate experienced by six case study
schools that received the federal grants in Idaho, Maryland, and Mi
schools that received the
federal grants in Idaho, Maryland, and Mi
federal grants in Idaho, Maryland, and Mic
grants in Idaho, Maryland, and Michigan.
In fall 2011, Marshall High welcomed students to an upgraded facility and a brand - new staff, thanks to a
federal School Improvement Grant.
Changing the
School Climate is the First Step to Reform
in Many
Schools with
Federal Improvement Grants (PDF format, 180 KB)
Nationally, 27 percent of the
schools that have received
federal school improvement grants have lost 20 percent or more of their students
in recent years, according to a Catalyst Chicago analysis of
federal data.
The first special report,
Schools with Federal Improvement Grants Face Challenges in Replacing Principals and Teachers, looks at how states, districts, and schools are addressing challenges related to SIG staffing requir
Schools with
Federal Improvement Grants Face Challenges
in Replacing Principals and Teachers, looks at how states, districts, and
schools are addressing challenges related to SIG staffing requir
schools are addressing challenges related to SIG staffing requirements.
With unprecedented
federal investment
in failing
schools through the multi-billion-dollar
School Improvement Grant program, it's been a big year for school turnaround ef
School Improvement Grant program, it's been a big year for
school turnaround ef
school turnaround efforts.
As the
federal School Improvement Grants program winds down, Tim Prudente of the Baltimore Sun writes about one low - performing school in Baltimore, Mary Rodman Elementary, which is using one of the last grants to be given under the pr
School Improvement Grants program winds down, Tim Prudente of the Baltimore Sun writes about one low - performing school in Baltimore, Mary Rodman Elementary, which is using one of the last grants to be given under the pr
Grants program winds down, Tim Prudente of the Baltimore Sun writes about one low - performing
school in Baltimore, Mary Rodman Elementary, which is using one of the last grants to be given under the pr
school in Baltimore, Mary Rodman Elementary, which is using one of the last
grants to be given under the pr
grants to be given under the program.
In late 2014, the state launched a first - of - its - kind desegregation plan — the Socioeconomic Integration Pilot program — using
federal School Improvement Grant, or SIG, funds.
The first was a quantitative analysis of student academic outcomes, comparing results for
schools that received
federal School Improvement Grant (SIG) funding to similar
schools in the same districts that did not.
This year, most of those
schools in every state received substantial
federal School Improvement Grants, often a million dollars over three years, with the expectation that they will be «turned around» or made into much better
schools.
Test scores, graduation rates and college enrollment were no different
in schools that received money through the
School Improvement Grants program — the largest
federal investment ever targeted to failing
schools — than
in schools that did not.
The Denver Post determined that 35 percent of the
federal funds allocated to that city
in a
School Improvement Grant was spent for consultants, not for students or teachers or
schools.2
An example of Scott's work
in the region is a report she and her team recently completed for the Oregon Department of Education that described how Oregon
schools used their
federal school improvement grants in 2012.
The administration promised $ 1 billion
in new spending on preschool; spurred states to adopt controversial K - 12 reforms such as performance - based teacher evaluations and the adoption of the Common Core State Standards through its Race to the Top
grant program and waivers to the No Child Left Behind law; significantly expanded the federal School Improvement Grant program to turn around low - performing schools; targeted for - profit colleges and attempted to increase accountability in the higher education sector; and pushed a proposal by the president to make community college
grant program and waivers to the No Child Left Behind law; significantly expanded the
federal School Improvement Grant program to turn around low - performing schools; targeted for - profit colleges and attempted to increase accountability in the higher education sector; and pushed a proposal by the president to make community college
Grant program to turn around low - performing
schools; targeted for - profit colleges and attempted to increase accountability
in the higher education sector; and pushed a proposal by the president to make community college free.
Under the group's proposal, the bonuses would double for teachers
in struggling
schools — the report suggests using the 33
schools eligible for
federal School Improvement Grants — but they wouldn't generate changes
in base salary increases unless the teachers maintained the same rating for three straight years.
Ross C. Santy, director of EdFacts, told state and district officials who attended a National Center for Education Statistics conference
in Washington, D.C., last week they would still have to report student achievement data to receive
federal funding, like Title I and
school improvement grants.
PCAPS Coordinator Ron Whitehorne outlined the strategy for getting 10 % of Philadelphia
Schools to be Sustainable Community
Schools in four years, focusing on the demand that
federal School Improvement Grant money be used exclusively for that purpose.
CEC specializes
in helping low - performing
schools and their districts to implement comprehensive
improvements, such as those required by the
federal School Improvement Grant (SIG) program, with extensive on - site support.
May, 2011 —
Federal Fiscal Year 2010 1003 (a), project period July 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012 The application for federal fiscal year (FFY) 2010 School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds, authorized under Section 1003 (a) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), is available to school divisions for use in Title I schools in Title I School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cr
Federal Fiscal Year 2010 1003 (a), project period July 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012 The application for
federal fiscal year (FFY) 2010 School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds, authorized under Section 1003 (a) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), is available to school divisions for use in Title I schools in Title I School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cr
federal fiscal year (FFY) 2010
School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds, authorized under Section 1003 (a) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), is available to school divisions for use in Title I schools in Title I School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cri
School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds, authorized under Section 1003 (a) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), is available to
school divisions for use in Title I schools in Title I School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cri
school divisions for use
in Title I
schools in Title I
School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cri
School Improvement or Title I eligible
schools that meet certain criteria.
The Obama administration has used
federal money for the Teacher Incentive Fund, Race to the Top and
School Improvement Grant program to encourage policymakers
in states and districts to adopt new teacher evaluations that incorporate student test scores, despite the controversy surrounding them.
Only one
federal program — the
School Improvement Grant program — provides money specifically to establish extended learning time
in schools.
With help from a
federal School Improvement Grant, programs were put
in place like the one - to - one laptop initiative to give each student access to technology.
Roberts was one of four
schools in the district to receive $ 2 million
in federal funding from a
School Improvement Grant.