Sentences with phrase «in first person point»

You're writing in the first person point of view and can use the word «I.» It's understood that the LinkedIn profile is more of a personal piece to your professional highlights and experiences because it'll also show who you're connected to and recommendations and endorsements you've received from others.

Moving at fast speeds in a first person point of view can certainly be intense for some people, but I personally had zero issues while playing Driveclub.

One Last Thing is written entirely in first person point of view from Tara's viewpoint.

Told in first person point of view by Brian Atwood, who is our main character and works for the FBI.

Not exact matches

Partner with thought leaders in your industry to gain first - person points of view on ways to connect with and develop relationships with Latinas.

You can look at time points, what people ask for in their first week and what product they are using and what is the nature of the question.

Blau points to a pattern with social networks and other free services in which, when ads are introduced, «people complain, there is a sort of backlash or revolt» at first, but ultimately the outcry diminishes and most users become habituated to the ads.

It may be a little hard to understand, but the point is that people have been fleeing long volatility ETFs and piling into short volatility ETFs, to the point where the public is no longer net long volatility, for the first time in history.

[5:45] Intangible assets that business owners must leverage [11:50] Analyzing, measuring and replacing underperforming aspects [14:00] First impressions and first statements [17:40] The lifetime value of a customer [20:00] Incentivizing employees [20:45] Ingenuity to find new points of leverage [22:00] Jay's experience turning «Icy Hot» around [26:30] The power of one small shift [27:50] Three ways to grow a business exponentially [33:40] What stops people from optimization [40:00] The value you bring to a customer [43:00] Measuring, quantifying and improving your processes [48:10] Why most businesses fail [50:00] Building pillars that will support your business [57:00] Providing comfort for your customer can bring in more reFirst impressions and first statements [17:40] The lifetime value of a customer [20:00] Incentivizing employees [20:45] Ingenuity to find new points of leverage [22:00] Jay's experience turning «Icy Hot» around [26:30] The power of one small shift [27:50] Three ways to grow a business exponentially [33:40] What stops people from optimization [40:00] The value you bring to a customer [43:00] Measuring, quantifying and improving your processes [48:10] Why most businesses fail [50:00] Building pillars that will support your business [57:00] Providing comfort for your customer can bring in more refirst statements [17:40] The lifetime value of a customer [20:00] Incentivizing employees [20:45] Ingenuity to find new points of leverage [22:00] Jay's experience turning «Icy Hot» around [26:30] The power of one small shift [27:50] Three ways to grow a business exponentially [33:40] What stops people from optimization [40:00] The value you bring to a customer [43:00] Measuring, quantifying and improving your processes [48:10] Why most businesses fail [50:00] Building pillars that will support your business [57:00] Providing comfort for your customer can bring in more revenue

Many people point to 1965, but I prefer to count from 1976 because it is the first year that topped 500,000 immigrants since the 1920s, coinciding with the decision to admit Vietnamese refugees, and 90 percent of all immigrants still in the United States in 2016 entered after 1975.

The Confessions do not in the first place talk about God; Marion makes a great point of saying that the second grammatical person prevails here over the third person.?

Most people transfer points to the Singapore KrisFlyer miles program because they want to experience Singapore Suites — Singapore Airlines» first class luxury double bed in the sky.

Once in a while, people are given a third - person point of view and are asked by the author to act on that knowledge, but for the most part, we are stuck in first - person.

They point to the priest sex scandals as proof positive that chastity is too much to ask of people — completely ignoring that it was the randy absence of chastity that created the scandals in the first place.

If you pay attention to what I wrote, I accuse both the atheist and the religious person in that «intelligent design» conversation of anthropomorphizing intelligence and debating the point from the wrong perspective in the first place.

North Point Community Church in Atlanta was averaging 4,000 people in attendance at the end of its first year.

Igaftr, I have read that before; the who celibacy thing is supposedly voluntary in the first place, and as you've pointed out, is rather untenable for either gay people it hetero.

First, maybe someone does need to point out sin in other people's life.

Wish I had pointed out that Esther was the one chosen to save God's people, and that the first evangelists were women, and Mary Magedelene was the «first apostle to the apostles», and Philip's four daughters were all prophetesses, and in the last days, God will pour out His Spirit and young men and women will prophesy.»

To disagree would mean they have a valid point that a logical person could possibly agree with in the first place!

Scot McKnight was the first person to draw my attention to the fact that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in a church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to learn from women scholars» (The Blue Parakeet, p. 148).

Jennifer Roback Morse of the Acton Institute points out on their website that, in the very first paragraph of the encyclical we discover that «Benedict's perspective on Truth has its own view of human freedom as well as of the human good: «Each person finds his good by adherence to God's plan for him, -LSB-...] in this plan, he finds his truth, and through adherence to this truth he becomes free.»»

This is the point of view of an elitist from the first world with total disregard to the circu.mstances of lots and lots of people in much more difficult circ.umstances in the rest of the world who have neither the leisure time, education, literacy, or resources to «study» any religion, let alone choose yours to study.

And don't even get them started on natural disasters, the religious watch some people far away in pain and suffering their first response is to point a finger at any well groomed stylish men they can find and ask «Hmmmm?

Case in point: I have actually had the Lord SAY things to me that some other person I met somewhere else had an exact same story of the Lord saying the exact same freaky thing to them — and I KNOW this person didn't know my story, and now I'm feeling I'd be illegitimate to tell him that the Lord spoke the exact same thing to me, because he shared his story first.

Even the Brundtland Commission, which at first glance seems to be an exception with its blunt language about unsustainable population growth, ends in a familiar UN place: «Talking of population just as numbers glosses over an important point: People are also a creative resource, and this creativity is an asset societies must tap....

The fact that people of faith would glorify death in the first place proves exactly my point.

In his translation and commentary on the first six chapters of the classical book of Hinduism, the Bhagavad - Gita, the Maharishi notes that TM takes a person in whatever level of faith he finds himself, then leads him beyond that point (Maharishi Mahesh Yogi on the Bhagavad - Gita [MMYBG, pp. 317 - 319]-RRBIn his translation and commentary on the first six chapters of the classical book of Hinduism, the Bhagavad - Gita, the Maharishi notes that TM takes a person in whatever level of faith he finds himself, then leads him beyond that point (Maharishi Mahesh Yogi on the Bhagavad - Gita [MMYBG, pp. 317 - 319]-RRBin whatever level of faith he finds himself, then leads him beyond that point (Maharishi Mahesh Yogi on the Bhagavad - Gita [MMYBG, pp. 317 - 319]-RRB-.

He took a long look at the room of would - be pastors and ministerial leaders, each of us zealous to earn our future roles in churches, ministries and on the mission field and delivered his first teaching point: «The wrong person at the wrong place at the wrong time always results in the wrong thing happening.»

How could paganism point to Christ when it was never intended to point people to Christ in the first place?

While I could have pointed out that God is at work in the lives of all people to one degree or another (John 16:8 - 15), I first decided to run a spiritual diagnostic to determine his spiritual condition.

The great shift from «the large group of educated people» (Systematic Theology, III, p. 4) to the oppressed as the starting point of theology, though only in its very first stages, is already being strongly resisted.

So as long as Peter (Roman Catholic's first pope and all the future popes for that matter) professes faith in Jesus Christ as God's son whatever the pope says is bound, believe Jesus Christ, it will be bounded in heaven... hey I don't like all the mistakes that happen in church but as one person said (point out the window and realize you're pointing to a mirror....

Actually Brehvik does not consider himself a christian in his words, «in the strictest sense», so the first part of your point is moot... Secondly I think a fairer statement would be that not «all» muslims are violent extremists, as many who don't live in western countries are, as their book does instruct them to kill any and all who do not procalim allah as the one god and mohammed as his prophet... As far as having extreme passion for one's beliefs, if someone was truly to be an «extreme» christian that person would be completely loving as this was Jesus» command to love both God and everyone... to take that to the extreme would mean «extreme» loving, like the radical kind of love that caused Jesus to endure the cross for the sins of us all... includinig the man who committed this atrocity and yes any and all of the muslim's who have committed similar things.

Nowhere is the author making the point that if people sin willfully, or even if they return to an empty form of religion which accomplished nothing, that this proves that they do not have eternal life, lost their eternal life, or never had it in the first place.

In order to counter this limitation of the third - person perspective, it is necessary to imaginatively assume a first - person point of view.

As Christopher Lasch also points out, new therapies» solutions are tautological, self - defeating to the extent that they advise people «not to make too large an investment in love and friendship, to avoid excessive independence on others, and to live for the moment — the very conditions that created the crisis of personal relations in the first place» (New York Review of Books [September 30, 1976]-RRB-.

the belief on the existence of the devil was concieved by theologians of the past thousands of years, there was no other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we are part of God, and He himself is evolving because He is the universe, We are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also be His destiny because it is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us humans including the supernatural is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children enjoys it as part of their learning process.

First, Wilberforce did not abolish the West African slave trade because he came to a different view from Paul, but because he held the same view as Paul (not least as expressed in 1 Timothy 1:10, which forbids enslaving people), a point which is clear from his writings.

Rabbi Maurice Davis of White Plains, New York, points out that the present generation of Jewish young people, those born here in the «60s, is the first one that can not reasonably expect to surpass its parents» achievements, as those parents did their parents».

As far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentnz

In continuation to my first comment, why do people point fingers at Christians are portray them as a threat?

In fact, the first paragraph of the City of God alludes to the famous passage from the prophet Habakkuk, «the just shall live by faith,» and in book nineteen Augustine cites Habakkuk twice, most notably at a point where he links the just person (iustus) to the justice (iustitia) due God «who rules an obedient city according to his grace.&raquIn fact, the first paragraph of the City of God alludes to the famous passage from the prophet Habakkuk, «the just shall live by faith,» and in book nineteen Augustine cites Habakkuk twice, most notably at a point where he links the just person (iustus) to the justice (iustitia) due God «who rules an obedient city according to his grace.&raquin book nineteen Augustine cites Habakkuk twice, most notably at a point where he links the just person (iustus) to the justice (iustitia) due God «who rules an obedient city according to his grace.»

For the first time in history, the father and the doctor and the health - insurance actuary can point a finger at her as the person who allowed an inconvenient human being to come into the world.

The chief points of change are, first, that the scene has been transferred from the supernatural world of the gods to the earthly sphere of human history; secondly, that It is not a god who experiences the renewal of life (for the God of Israel is not himself subject to death and resurrection, but on the contrary initiates and controls these events) but the people of Israel, who look in hope for restoration when their existence is threatened; and thirdly, that this hope is expressed as a metaphor describing the historical future, rather than as a myth of cosmic renewal.

The charity said if people spot those signs in their child, the first step is to keep lines of communication open and try to see things from the child's point of view.

Let the preacher, then, first of all know where he and they are going, whether this be in the proper sense a conclusion or whether this be a point at which he stops, leaving each person to draw his own conclusion, as Jesus often did in the parables.

But when we see the people on the other side of the debate as the enemy (by calling them names, labeling them or demeaning their convictions), we miss the point of what «fighting for our faith» is supposed to be about in the first place.

I make these general remarks about the two sorts of judgment, because there are many religious persons — some of you now present, possibly, are among them — who do not yet make a working use of the distinction, and who may therefore feel at first a little startled at the purely existential point of view from which in the following lectures the phenomena of religious experience must be considered.

It's been pointed out that a surprising number of hymns speak in the first person as God.