Sentences with phrase «in flawed theories»

Not exact matches

• Bad economic theory: Greenspan's «oops» moment came when he told Congress he found a flaw in his idea that bank executives would never do anything that would hurt the reputations, never mind the survival, of their institutions.

Qualcomm has appealed the South Korean fine in court and contends the FTC's case, which was filed in the waning days of the Obama administration, is based on a flawed legal theory and fails to show harm.

If you've been reading some of my recent posts, you will have noted my, and the Investment Masters belief, that many of the investment theories taught in most business schools are flawed.

According to the «Austrian school», one of the most basic flaws in the QTM and in many other economic theories is the treatment of the economy as an amorphous blob that shifts one way or the other in response to stimuli provided by the government, the central bank, or a vague and unpredictable force called «animal spirits».

There are numerous flaws in this theory, including not knowing just how much new money needs to be printed, or when to stop.

Other qualified scientists with no vested interest in seeing a given theory succeed or fail attempt to find flaws in the methodologies described in the source paper by replicating the processes themselves to see if they get the same results.

If your scientists can't make the simplest form of life, and your neo-Darwinian evolution theory is seriously flawed, it would seem that your faith in blind chance should be much weaker than it is.

Centuries after Newton's death, the theory of relativity expanded the range of physical conditions, which exposed flaws in Newton's thinking.

This is particularly helpful in the first two chapters, when one is going through clearly flawed theories.

With my imagination captivated by humanity's flawed attempts at Eden, and my head lost in philosophy, I couldn't understand why anyone was thinking about «theories.»

As to your assertion on epistemology, you don't go outright and say it but you are basing your opinion on the sole idea that at this point in time, our epistemology is flawed and ipso facto our theories are flawed.

And proof will not come by finding flaws with the existing theory and saying «FILL IN THE BLANKS WITH GOD».

If your world view and faith is so fragile that you can't accept even a basic flaw in your religion, you probably have greater problems than just trying to explain away a scientific theory.

As a Christian I have no need to respond with «You're so stupid» or similar comments, because my faith in God is strong enough that I will believe no matter what, and my degree will enable me to understand and find any flaw in any theory that supposedly «proves» that God doesn't exist.

The theory of not believing in anything, is more flawed than the accusations the replies have been made to this comment.

Evolutionists have themselves noted these glaring flaws in Darwinian theory and have sought to deal with them in the manner of Stephen J. Gould, who has suggested that speciation is a sudden and dramatic event which therefore does not show up in the fossil record.

And like Evolution, the Theory of Mechanics has been supplanted by more complex and more accurate theories (in the case of Mechanics, both Quantum Mechanics and Relativity have arisen to deal with its flaws; in the case of Evolution, the technical theories - such as gene borrowing and virus - guided genetic drift - do not have catchy names).

Agreed and whenever you ask a believer to provide evidence of their theory, they can't so they just turn around and point out flaws (real or imagined) in yours.

In relation to Kierkegaard's thought, Ernest Becker's theory of scapegoating is interesting but seriously flawed.

One might have thought it a virtue rather than a flaw that the article was situated not in a single theory but in a developing tradition.

In brief: Such websites point to logical and factual flaws in the writings of the Intelligent Design movement and take issue as well with their intellectual honesty — as when, ever eager to write the obituary for Darwinian theory, they fail to acknowledge progress in evolutionary biologIn brief: Such websites point to logical and factual flaws in the writings of the Intelligent Design movement and take issue as well with their intellectual honesty — as when, ever eager to write the obituary for Darwinian theory, they fail to acknowledge progress in evolutionary biologin the writings of the Intelligent Design movement and take issue as well with their intellectual honesty — as when, ever eager to write the obituary for Darwinian theory, they fail to acknowledge progress in evolutionary biologin evolutionary biology.

The point im trying to make is that darwin saw some major flaws in his theory.

That historical Morman factoid should lead one to believe there might be a few fundamental flaws in Smith's translation and ergo in Morman theory as well..

The flaws in your theory are being found out, and they won't stay hidden and covered forever.

10 I do not have space to criticize all the flaws in Whiteheads later theory, nor explore their sources, nor extol the many insights of this great man.

But the fatal flaw in all such theories is that crystals, while highly ordered, are low in information content.

Fossile Record: Again, all assumption and proving flaws in Evolution theory in no way is affirmative evidence for god, it just means that there are holes that have yet to be filled, it could be filled with god I'll allow, but you would have to literally find the fingerprints of god in the fossil record in order to link your god to having a hand in evolution.

============ CONCLUSIONS A. # 1 is an accepted scientific fact, by theists and atheists, importantly: it does not in and of itself describe how we got from initial proto - cell to current complexity B. # 2 has a severe flaw, as phyletic gradualism is dead, and punctuated equilibrium (the fossil record being characterized by new species appearing fully formed) is an accepted fact C. # 3 is the ONLY theory that has support from the fossil record

I was amused by the comment by ntlPol101 who suggested that science, in changing it's theories over time, is somehow exposing a flaw in scientific reasoning.

For Whitehead sees Bradley's theory as flawed because «he accepts the language which is developed from another point of view» (ESP 117; cf. PR 167), i.e., he makes the «sensationalist assumption» (PR 190) that feeling is only analyzable in terms of universals.

You do not accept the scienctific theories and dismiss them, but readily accept the theoretical gods men created 2000 years ago... do you not see the flaw in your logic?

that their religion is flawed somehow... and when questioned why they try to push their ideas on everybody else, they get frustrated and say that it's the Religious ones that push their ideas on people... NOT THEM... That's funny because i have about 1000 comments on this thread that state the opposite... Atheist's i see on this post appear to fall into that category of people that need to try and convince others to believe what they do because they're not sure in their own beliefs... They know that believing in the big bang theory or other similar theories takes as much faith as any religion has to offer... and when pinned down to the facts that By the laws of physics... the big bang couldn't happen....

not me mate, your making up you own arguements, which are flawed by the way.So if Coquelin were to leave where would he go?According to you theory obviously it will be to another Champions league team, so are you saying they won't have legitimate competition in the team?Competition breeds winners, we havent had this at Arsenal in a long time and we still don't have it upfront and in dm, we sort of have it at CB with Gabriel, but until we correct this competition deficit in our squad with at least arguably WC players then we won't win the BIG trophies as usual

Right away, Goldberger saw a flaw in the fly - infection theory: Institutions with pellagra cases consistently reported that staff members, presumably vulnerable to the same flies, weren't diagnosed with the disease.

Fischbach is the epitome of the curious soul, constantly poking around at the edges of known physics in search of something that other people overlooked: a fifth force of nature, for instance, or a flaw in Einstein's theory of relativity.

«There's an unease from some quarters that you will give ammunition to the creationists and intelligent design people — that they'll say, «Ah, this shows flaws in Darwinian theory,»» he says.

Einstein arrived at special relativity almost purely from an examination of logical flaws in the then current theories of physics, flaws that were evident for all to see.

Most jarringly, dark matter could be largely illusory, indicative of a flaw in our understanding of gravity via Einstein's theory of general relativity.

Without evidence of some such flaw in the theory, physicists are left groping in the dark for ways to improve it.

As a result, he was acutely sensitive to flaws and contradictions in the logical structure of physical theories.

The flaw in the Copenhagen interpretation is that it has no basis in theory — it is more like a story that scientists tell to make sense of facts that otherwise would seem nonsensical.

In 2005, Rathke analyzed Mills's theory and published a paper in which he concluded it was flawed and incompatible with everything physicists knew (New J. PhyIn 2005, Rathke analyzed Mills's theory and published a paper in which he concluded it was flawed and incompatible with everything physicists knew (New J. Phyin which he concluded it was flawed and incompatible with everything physicists knew (New J. Phys.

Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piattelli - Palmarini discuss what they see as flaws in Darwin's theory (6 February, p 28).

But some researchers have taken to approaching the problem from the other direction: What if the discrepancy arises from a flaw in our theory of gravity rather than from some provider of mass that we can not see?

It was in exploring those interstitial domains that Albrecht stumbled on his clock ambiguity, which may have uncovered a fatal flaw: Even if string theory works, it is not clear how to use it to predict the kind of universe that would unfold from its rules.

About three years ago they and another research team working independently at Princeton found a serious flaw in what has been the most widely accepted theory of galactic magnetic fields — a theory that with slight variations has also been used to explain the magnetic fields of individual stars such as the sun.

Paleontologists also point to moving thigh bones in theropod dinosaurs as a major flaw in the dinosaurs - to - birds theory.

His understanding of evolutionary theory is flawed, his knowledge of the human fossil record is superficial, he ignores or defines away data which does not support his ideas, and even some of the evidence he cites in his support is so badly misrepresented that it contradicts his claims instead of supporting them.

I don't buy into this theory and Chris Kresser has an in - depth post that explains the scientific flaws in this theory if you're interested.

The fatal flaw of the theory that vitamin A causes osteoporis is paradigmatic: the general approach to nutrition that looks at vitamins as isolated chemicals acting in a vacuum, rather than foods — grand, complex associations of many chemicals that all act in concert — can only bear so much fruit before faltering.