Clarence Clark, in his Talks on an Indian Village, describes this phenomenon to children in the West
in following sentences,
Then,
in the following sentence / s you say... (paraphrase here)... «Church teaches «correct principles... and it's members (should) vote for and support the candidates and measures that will uphold «correct principles.»»
I would not dare say how far Norman Pittenger would go in supporting the position of this book, but with his definition of the «divinity» of Christ as contained
in the following sentence, I would completely and wholeheartedly agree: «Jesus, is then, truly human; he is truly divine.
Very occasionally, Berlin will add a significant qualification to this theoretical objection, as
in the following sentence: «The notion of a perfect society in which all that men have striven for finds total fulfillment is consequently perceived to be incoherent, at any rate in terrestrial terms.»
and you go on to say it again,
in the following sentence after that.
So to eee mell me please get address from every other word starting with first word
in the following sentence...» Jamal nine cyphers nine at nine g nine mail nine dot nine com...
Think about finding the main idea
in the following sentence: «The silly mid-off missed John's shot off a googly.»
I'm reminded of the old Sy Fliegel quip: «Define «taught» as used
in the following sentence: «I taught her to swim but every time she gets into the water she sinks to the bottom of the pool.
Do you know how many hooks are included
in the following sentence?
This is sometimes done to avoid repetition; you might write Roger in one sentence, but
he in the following sentence.
As I see it, your confusion is best revealed
in the following sentence: «you have temperature dropping when aerosol forcing increases from 2 to (let's say) 8, then rising again as the aerosols clear.»
One day I believe political leaders among us will substitute the word ECOLOGY for the word ECONOMY
in the following sentence.
Here's what Trenberth says
in the following sentence:
Both techniques are evident
in the following sentence:
There is no need for a colon
in the following sentence:... [more]
And instead of using this buzzword on your CV, you could use a better word in a more unusual way, such as
in the following sentence: «My career demonstrates a meticulous dedication to the design industry.»
Example: In a cover letter, should you use who or whom
in the following sentence?
Blog can also be used as a verb, as
in the following sentence: «Today I will blog about home prices in my area, because it's a popular topic for my intended audience.»
Not exact matches
Congress enacted mandatory minimum
sentencing laws
in response to the 1980s crack epidemic, and many states
followed suit with similar laws.
If you've received a personal referral, you'll want to include who gave you the referral very early on, probably
in the first
sentence following the salutation.
Following in the footsteps of fellow millionaire celebrity Wesley Snipes, Hill was
sentenced to three months
in prison and three months home probation for failing to report her income between 2005 and 2007.
I have sat
in restaurants and had people who I am sitting with, when people come over to talk to me, they say, «Come on, we're eating dinner here»... and I let it go for a while and then I turn to that person or those people and I say the
following sentence: «How do you think we got this table?
Curtis says that, unless you can connect with your targets
in the first three
sentences, they won't
follow through and even bother reading the rest.
On the 147th page of Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving
In, at the start of the «In Conclusion» section, the following sentence appears: «There is probably nothing in this book which you did not already know at some level of your experience.&raqu
In, at the start of the «
In Conclusion» section, the following sentence appears: «There is probably nothing in this book which you did not already know at some level of your experience.&raqu
In Conclusion» section, the
following sentence appears: «There is probably nothing
in this book which you did not already know at some level of your experience.&raqu
in this book which you did not already know at some level of your experience.»
Mill was imprisoned last week
following a
sentencing from a Philadelphia judge, who Mill's attorney said showed an inappropriate «personal bias»
in a «ridiculous» decision that the rapper's legal team is currently appealing.
When rapper Meek Mill was
sentenced to 2 - 4 years
in prison last week for violating his probation, an outpouring of protest
followed the controversial decision, with Jay - Z being one of Mill's most fervent supporters.
Both Avery and Dassey are currently serving life
sentences in prison
following their convictions
in connection with the 2006 murder of Teresa Halbach.
It came crashing down hard on Friday as a federal judge
in Manhattan
sentenced Ulbricht to serve the rest of his life
in prison,
following his earlier conviction on seven charges related to conspiracy, narcotics and money - laundering.
One
sentence thesis and updates
in Catalyst Tracker to
follow.
Ironically,
in the excellent paragraph immediately
following her bullshit
sentence, Janet Yellen tells us precisely why it is a bullshit
sentence:
The eighth and ninth
sentences of the second paragraph within the Credit Quality section
in the Overview of Continuing Operations should read as
follows:
Life
in prison without the possiblity of parole is a just
sentence following conviction.
Those that
follows the Bible can easily spend their entire lives walking through the halls of the Bible, and pasting the phrases and stories that were used
in it into parts of modern day
sentences.
The difference
in times
in Mark 15:25 and John 19:14 are likely because Mark was recording time
in a Hebrew fashion (3rd hour from sunup = ~ 9 am) and John was recording the time of Pilates
sentence as Roman time (measured from midnight) 6th hour was 6 am with the crucifixion to
follow 3 hours later.
Furthermore, by removing language about an «unacceptable pregnancy,» «past Christian teaching» (which seems to be used as a cover for what
follows in the
sentence), and what may «warrant» abortion, some of the paragraph's more pro-choice references have been removed.
The Mailer who can write a
sentence like «his eyes were blue like the faded blue of the sky when the sky is white» is about as far as is humanly possible from the Mailer whose political reporting
in the early 1960s remains irresistible long after its subjects have faded» and reestablished his literary reputation that had begun to fade with the critical and popular questioning of the novels that
followed The Naked and the Dead.
Sounds like Pink Floyd time — I think here some «Us and Them»
in that
sentence — think of it how you want I guess — we both
follow the same Christ.
Dassey was convicted of first - degree homicide, second - degree sexual assault and mutilation of a corpse
following the death of Teresa Halbach
in 2005 and
sentenced to life with no parole for 41 years — he was just 17 at the time.
After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be issued against these Defendants.The guilty verdict
followed nearly a month of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors of the 150 case exhibits produced by Court Prosecutors, The Court's judgement declares the wealth and property of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 children who died
in the residential schools.To enforce its
sentence, the Court has empowered citizens
in Canada, the United States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, which are the main agents
in the deaths of these children
Austin, How concerned are you that you will be
sentenced to eternity
in Tartarus for not
following Zeus» rules?
Jesus» teaching fits together
in a similar way: «eternal punishment» consists of torment
followed by destruction — like a combined
sentence of hard labour
followed by execution.
Two
sentences in the discussion of reason
in the earlier version of the report could be taken to support the use of such analysis: «By reason we relate our witness to the full range of human knowledge and experience,» and «By our quest for reasoned understandings of Christian faith we seek to grasp and express the gospel
in a way that will commend itself to thoughtful persons who are seeking to know and
follow God's ways.»
I mean critics who, like Rainey, love to begin
sentences with formulations like the
following: «If it is true, as the logic of poststructuralism asserts, that every erasure will leave its trace
in such a way that the very thing one is trying to exclude is disclosed as the hidden center of a contaminated order, then...» Then what?
Furthermore, a core point
in the second
sentence can be restated as
follows: what is forbidden is the division of the basic region.
Although the
sentences of 2.2 - 5 appear to be incomplete and do not
follow grammatical convention, the use of d i a with the accusative
in v. 4 suggests that the false brothers were behind the push to circumcise the Gentile Christian.
A theory technically is defined
in contemporary logic to be a set of
sentences such that any
sentence which logically
follows from members
in the set is also
in the set.
In the logical reading this means that «John loves Eloise» logically
follows from the statements of the program interpreted as formal logical
sentences.
You're certainly correct that we need to be clear about the terms we are talking about, for example the first two «we's
in this
sentence refer to you and I specifically, or generally anyone who is engaging
in a debate / discussion — but when I said «If war is wrong, then it
follows that we should never go to war» the «we» meant Christians, when I'm talking to you I agree that we are talking about what we as followers of Jesus should do, not just generally members of a given country or society should do.
With regard to the meaning of the last
sentence, I do agree with David Boucher's interpretation of reducing its meaning to being a reference to the
following term's lectures.36
In my view, however, it is the last but one sentence which is of utmost importance here, referring as it does to Collingwood's concept of objective idealism, as elaborated in «Realism and Idealism» and adumbrated in «The Function of Metaphysics in Civilizatio
In my view, however, it is the last but one
sentence which is of utmost importance here, referring as it does to Collingwood's concept of objective idealism, as elaborated
in «Realism and Idealism» and adumbrated in «The Function of Metaphysics in Civilizatio
in «Realism and Idealism» and adumbrated
in «The Function of Metaphysics in Civilizatio
in «The Function of Metaphysics
in Civilizatio
in Civilization.
Read the
following statements a few
sentences at a time and then close your eyes and repeat them
in your mind silently.