They are the ones who attacked it as a party plank, they are the ones who have been taking millions
in fossil fuel money to fund an organized disinformation campaign about it, they are the ones who harass climate scientists.
Not exact matches
They first began working toward this goal
in the 90s, when the government taxed
fossil fuels and put 3.5 % of all that
money towards its national forests.
A coalition of 40 Catholic institutions on Tuesday announced a decision to pull their
money from — or block future investment
in —
fossil fuels.
If the world's governments fulfil their pledges to tackle climate change by cutting carbon emissions, many
fossil fuel reserves would have to be kept
in the ground, potentially wasting trillions of investors»
money.
Last year, twice as much
money was invested globally
in renewable energy as
in fossil fuels.
Investment
in clean energy set a new record last year, with more
money invested globally
in new renewable power than
in new power from
fossil fuels.
Its not just the liberals, prior to their entrance on stage» it was the conservatives taking
in this
money for
fossil fuel approvals.
BC Chamber of Commerce massively promotes and supports these
fossil fuel and energy projects, since they believe it enhances «business growth»
in BC, and since it appears only
money talks
in this province, boycotting their membership is a first step
in demanding those corporations take an ethical stand for the protection of BC on this matter.
Oil and gas companies, the most profitable corporations
in history, are counting their
fossil fuel reserves as
money in the bank and continuing to spend capital on finding and developing even larger reserves.
It's the first mainstream religious organisation
in the UK to threaten to withdraw
money from
fossil fuel companies, after various «divestment» campaigns.
Turns out, $ 750 million worth of State
money is going to SolarCity to build solar panels, which will presumably be
in high demand as the nation transfers away from
fossil fuels and towards renewable energy sources.
«
Money from megadonors from multibillion dollar
fossil fuel industry should be rejected by all Long Island elected officials,» said Diane Goins of Hempstead, chairwoman of the Long Island Chapter of New York Communities for Change, a nonprofit coalition of working families
in low and moderate income communities.
Zephyr Teachout claimed that John Faso «took»
money from
fossil fuel companies while they were trying to use eminent domain to build a pipeline on the properties of residents
in the 19th Congressional District.
In their remarks Sanders and Teachout both assailed the influence of money in politics, income inequality and fossil fuel
In their remarks Sanders and Teachout both assailed the influence of
money in politics, income inequality and fossil fuel
in politics, income inequality and
fossil fuels.
If
money were the only lure for earth scientists,
fossil fuels might be the only fluids
in town.
They can not tell us how much
money will be invested
in green energy R&D, whether fertility rates will go up or down, whether we will dig up all the remaining
fossil fuels and burn them, or the outcomes of numerous other decisions that affect the atmosphere — though they can tell us what will probably happen if we do or don't take them (see «Earth, 2100 AD: Four futures of environment and society «-RRB-.
Environmental groups, climate activists, and some Democrats
in Congress have long complained that federal agencies, and DOE
in particular, have spent too much
money supporting the
fossil fuel industry, even as it racked up decades of impressive profits.
A study published today, by a group led by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), indicates that eliminating
fossil fuel subsidies could curb global greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 5 % through 2030 while saving hundreds of billions of dollars
in public
money.
Historically, Dr. Balling has taken plenty of
money from
fossil fuel interests, which brings
in funding not only to Balling's predetermined «research,» but hundreds of thousands of dollars
in overhead payments to Arizona State University (see Balling's 1997 testimony to the Minnesota News Council).
He has accepted more than $ 1.2 million
in money from the
fossil -
fuel industry over the last decade while failing to disclose that conflict of interest
in most of his scientific papers.
In India, Rogers discovered that carbon offset ventures were doing more harm than good because carbon offset money discourages certain countries from investing in wind or solar power and continues their reliance on fossil fuel
In India, Rogers discovered that carbon offset ventures were doing more harm than good because carbon offset
money discourages certain countries from investing
in wind or solar power and continues their reliance on fossil fuel
in wind or solar power and continues their reliance on
fossil fuels.
In particular, I want to keep my my
money out of
fossil fuel companies» pockets!
Dr. Depledge described signs of a shift
in the oil kingdom's stance, including its endorsement of science pointing to big impacts from a building human influence on climate and commitment of
money to pursue technologies for capturing carbon dioxide from the burning of
fossil fuels and other new energy options.
This notion underlies a lot of campaigns, ranging from Ecuador's effort to raise enough
money from international contributors to «leave the oil
in the soil» under its splendid Yasuní National Park to Bill McKibben's «Do the Math» campaign to rid university and college endowments of
fossil fuel investments.
While climate science promotes the narrative of cooperation for stopping the use of
fossil fuels, one just need to look to how much
money is spent
in national defence budgets to see that the world is still fiercely competing to control the remaining economically viable resources of
fossil fuels.
It's notable to see someone somewhere looking beyond
fossil fuels, just as Thomas Edison recommended
in 1931 when he told Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone: «I'd put my
money on the sun and solar energy.
More options all the time When I first became involved
in environmentalism, I remember the «ethical» banks and financial products I came across were mostly about negative screens: meaning avoiding putting
money in arms, pornography, tobacco or maybe
fossil fuels.
The effect will not be to remove but to move
money in the economy, from traditionally favored
fossil fuels to efficiency and renewables.
It's important to note that there's also sometimes a kind of «false inequivalence»
in the fight over climate science and policies — an implication that the lack of action on greenhouse gases is largely the result of the unfair advantage
in money and influence held by industries dealing
in, or dependent on,
fossil fuels.
Yet while
money may be flowing away from many
fossil fuel investments, investing
in solar projects has traditionally been somewhat cumbersome — requiring significant capital, legal expertise, and industry connections.
In fact if you look at
money changing hands, politicians who are AGW deniers are receiving tons of
money from
fossil fuel interests.
How a combination of
fossil fuel industry
money and free market fundamentalists support PR firms like CFACT and writers like David Wojick and we end up with lame strawman arguments and delay
in a rational response to address climate change: http://www.merchantsofdoubt.org
Combating climate change needs
money that is only available
in global bond and equity markets, which are heavily invested
in fossil fuels; public finances are needed to make them change direction
That will look like a number of things, first, continuing fights around the world to keep
fossil fuel in the ground, and second, continuing to follow the
money and expose the corporations and industries that stand
in the way of progress.
This move will not only cut carbon emissions, it will keep
money in the hands of American consumers and out of the pockets of the dirty
fossil fuel industry.
Similarly, people
in the
fossil fuel industries are making a lot of
money by digging up and burning
fossil fuels.
Biofuel investment should amount to 0.3 billion dollars up to 2035, Birol adds — so the big oil alternative would receive just 3 percent as much *
money as continued investment
in the
fossil fuel it is one day supposed to replace.
Accusations of corrupt
fossil fuel industry influence over skeptic climate scientists are irrelevant material — worthless —
in the absence of any physical evidence (full context document scans, undercover video / audio transcripts, leaked emails,
money - transfer receipts) proving such skeptics were paid and orchestrated to lie about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming.
There has been no shortage of public support for unfreezing Ohio's clean energy standards, but behind the scenes,
fossil fuel and utility interests have been using
money to influence the debate
in Columbus.
Of course there is big
money in the
fossil fuel industry and where there is big
money there is often great dishonesty, consider the tobacco industry.
With Virginia's climate skeptic attorney general seeking the governor's seat and
fossil fuel money pouring
in, familiar battle lines are being drawn.
Most people not involved
in the
fossil fuel industry will be glad that tax
monies don't go to their coffers)
For years, environmentalists have been attacking Soon for taking
money from energy companies with
fossil fuel interests, the only update the Times story added was that Soon allegedly did not disclose this to academic journals he was being published
in.
Instead of putting constraints on poor countries that will hold back their ability to fight poverty, we should be investing dramatically more
money in R&D to make
fossil fuels cleaner and make clean energy cheaper than any
fossil fuel.
«While Americans have rallied
in support of clean renewable energy at home, the U.S. Export - Import Bank has made it a priority to handout
money to
fossil fuel companies to work on projects abroad,» said Kate DeAngelis of Friends of the Earth U.S. «If Trump gets his way, U.S. Export - Import Bank will become a slush fund for Big Oil's plans to accelerate climate change.
Fossil Free Southwark's first members met one another in February 2015 underneath the letter «N» whilst spelling out the words «Divest London» in front of Tower Bridge as part of a Global Divestment Day event calling on City Hall to take its money out of fossil
Fossil Free Southwark's first members met one another
in February 2015 underneath the letter «N» whilst spelling out the words «Divest London»
in front of Tower Bridge as part of a Global Divestment Day event calling on City Hall to take its
money out of
fossil fossil fuels.
Interestingly, the landmark international accord draws a big fat highlight (and maybe a circle and some stars
in the margin) across the work that activists and leaders are doing
in the Pacific Northwest: not just the work to keep
fossil fuels in the ground and make polluters pay for their pollution, but also our work to reduce the influence of
money in politics and reform broken North American democratic institutions.
Benefits of the carbon fee - and - dividend (
in which an across - the - board rising carbon fee is collected from
fossil fuel companies at the domestic mine or port — of - entry, with 100 % of the
money given to the public, an equal amount to each citizen) include the following:
As well, lower payroll taxes would give household pocketbooks extra
money to invest
in clean technology and cover higher electricity and
fuel costs that are inherent as solar, wind and other renewables replace
fossil fuels.
The
fossil fuel companies will pass the cost on to customers, but the person doing better than average
in limiting
fossil fuel use will make
money.