As for scores I personally don't care much but the way scores are used as an
end in gaming journalism is not my cup of tea.
Listening to the all of the independent developers talk about the product gave me such satisfaction to continue the
pursuit in gaming journalism.
Known as «Gamergate,» the controversy — ostensibly over
ethics in gaming journalism, but used as a vehicle to lash out against women in the gaming industry — has shone a spotlight on the ugliest part of gaming culture.
GG asks for better ethical
practices in gaming journalism and things such as policies and disclosing of personal relations between the developers and journalists is the tangible way to achieve them.
On the other hand, the fake «Game Fan» magazines are great, offering tips and codes for the games in your collection, previews of upcoming games, and funny articles written by real
people in gaming journalism.
So if there is no drinking
allowed in gaming journalism, does that mean Peter will be forced to either sack you or ban you from attending any parties held by publishers?
and i was extremely disappointed with MW3 but because it sells uber millions good scores must follow There is
hypocrisy in gaming journalism and the only way to get around it is to find out for yourself.
We've seen multiple re-appearances of age - old titles updated for the modern era, the usual innovation from the indie and kickstarter scenes, and we saw it all with some
tumult in the gaming journalism field as well.
When the question regarding females in journalism was raised it sparked up a discussion on the whole «Gamersgate» issue, but the female panelists were quick to reinforce their point of «we need
females in gaming journalism and PLEASE do not give up on your passion».