Profit declines sharply and company cuts full - year outlook
Cardinal Health Inc. reported a sharp decline in profit in its last quarter and lowered its full - year outlook following inventory write - downs in its overseas businesses and a sharper - than - anticipated decline in generic drug prices.
The U.S. filed its first charges
in a generic drug price - fixing probe on Wednesday, according to a report.
Not exact matches
Mylan No. 2 targeted
in massive
generic drug price collusion probe.
Rajiv Malik, president and executive director at EpiPen maker Mylan (essentially the company's number two exec), has been named
in a wide - ranging civil suit alleging
drug price collusion by numerous prominent
generic drug makers.
Walgreens had forecast that the
prices of
generic drugs would fall — only to realize that
in fact they were rising.
However analysts point to a bounce
in Teva's shares over the past four months and a slowing
in the rate of decline of U.S.
generic drug prices as bright spots.
Another bright spot could be the slowing
in the decline of U.S.
generic drug prices, according to report from Credit Suisse, citing data from health information company IQVIA.
Teva said
in a statement it would soon start producing a
generic version of the
drug that will be «
priced significantly lower than Viagra,» which will result
in «millions
in savings to consumers» and «make this medication accessible to people who might otherwise not have been able to afford it.»
Plus, a handful of companies will typically all get approved to make a
generic at once, which ideally creates competition
in the marketplace and can sometimes result
in even lower
prices for those
drugs.
Nothing about the
drug has changed
in that time, and the fact that it's
generic flies
in the face of the argument that lack of
generic competition is the reason for drastic
price hikes.
The companies have begun to market their «biosimilar» (a
generic version of expensive biologic
drugs) of Remicade — a copycat of J&J's best - selling rheumatoid arthritis and immunology treatment (which garnered more than $ 5 billion
in U.S. sales last year) and was approved by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA)
in April — at a striking 35 % discount to its list
price.
These risks and uncertainties include: Gilead's ability to achieve its anticipated full year 2018 financial results; Gilead's ability to sustain growth
in revenues for its antiviral and other programs; the risk that private and public payers may be reluctant to provide, or continue to provide, coverage or reimbursement for new products, including Vosevi, Yescarta, Epclusa, Harvoni, Genvoya, Odefsey, Descovy, Biktarvy and Vemlidy ®; austerity measures
in European countries that may increase the amount of discount required on Gilead's products; an increase
in discounts, chargebacks and rebates due to ongoing contracts and future negotiations with commercial and government payers; a larger than anticipated shift
in payer mix to more highly discounted payer segments and geographic regions and decreases
in treatment duration; availability of funding for state AIDS
Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; market share and price erosion caused by the introduction of generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the S
Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs); continued fluctuations
in ADAP purchases driven by federal and state grant cycles which may not mirror patient demand and may cause fluctuations
in Gilead's earnings; market share and
price erosion caused by the introduction of
generic versions of Viread and Truvada, an uncertain global macroeconomic environment; and potential amendments to the Affordable Care Act or other government action that could have the effect of lowering
prices or reducing the number of insured patients; the possibility of unfavorable results from clinical trials involving investigational compounds; Gilead's ability to initiate clinical trials
in its currently anticipated timeframes; the levels of inventory held by wholesalers and retailers which may cause fluctuations
in Gilead's earnings; Kite's ability to develop and commercialize cell therapies utilizing the zinc finger nuclease technology platform and realize the benefits of the Sangamo partnership; Gilead's ability to submit new
drug applications for new product candidates in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes in its stock price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the S
drug applications for new product candidates
in the timelines currently anticipated; Gilead's ability to receive regulatory approvals
in a timely manner or at all, for new and current products, including Biktarvy; Gilead's ability to successfully commercialize its products, including Biktarvy; the risk that physicians and patients may not see advantages of these products over other therapies and may therefore be reluctant to prescribe the products; Gilead's ability to successfully develop its hematology / oncology and inflammation / respiratory programs; safety and efficacy data from clinical studies may not warrant further development of Gilead's product candidates, including GS - 9620 and Yescarta
in combination with Pfizer's utomilumab; Gilead's ability to pay dividends or complete its share repurchase program due to changes
in its stock
price, corporate or other market conditions; fluctuations
in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar that may cause an unfavorable foreign currency exchange impact on Gilead's future revenues and pre-tax earnings; and other risks identified from time to time
in Gilead's reports filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Since biosimilars are so new to the U.S. market (there have been just five total approved here since 2015), it's been hard to gauge whether or not they can make a formidable dent
in high
drug prices by offering
generic alternatives to branded treatments.
The whole industry faces turmoil with the advent of laws
in several provinces demanding lower
prices on
generic drugs.
In Ontario, where the
drug reforms began, reimbursements for all
generics are down to 25 % of the branded
price.
Acquiring Akorn would add around $ 1 billion
in annual sales to Fresenius» drugmaking division, giving it a significantly larger presence
in eyecare and other areas widely perceived as somewhat insulated from
generic drug pricing pressure.
Teva beats first - quarter expectations but still has the same old problems Copaxone's market share and new
generic launches helped Teva to forecast - beating profit and revenue but problems persistTeva had to make
pricing concessions on its flagship multiple sclerosis
drug Copaxone, and now expects a delay
in approval of a key migraine
drug, fremanezumab.
In the U.S. some
generic drugs have an inflated
price because they are monopolized by one company.
«A civil war has broken out among the most powerful players
in the pharmaceutical industry — including brand - name and
generic drug makers, and even your local pharmacists — with each blaming others for the rising
price of medicine.»
Prices for some
generic drugs have increased
in recent years, adversely affecting patients who rely on them.
Decreased market competition causes
generic drug prices to rise significantly, according to an article published
in Annals of Internal Medicine.
In addition, researchers found low market competition levels had a more pronounced correlation with drug prices in lower - priced generic drugs compared with their higher - priced counterpart
In addition, researchers found low market competition levels had a more pronounced correlation with
drug prices in lower - priced generic drugs compared with their higher - priced counterpart
in lower -
priced generic drugs compared with their higher -
priced counterparts.
After controlling for other factors, a
generic drug in the highest marketing competition group was expected to see a decrease of 32 percent
in price over the study period, while a
generic drug in the lowest market competition was expected to see a
price increase of 47 percent over the same period.
These include patent expirations, the rise of competition from
generics, a downward pressure on
drug prices, increasing scrutiny from regulators and health technology assessment bodies, pressure to move research offshore, and the crisis
in R&D productivity.
If they are on the market without
generic versions to challenge them then companies can maintain monopoly
prices, and
in doing so harm consumers by preventing or delaying access to cheaper
drugs.»
Researchers found that increasing the use of
generic drugs and bringing Canadian
drug prices in line with other countries where universal
drug plans achieve better
prices through bulk purchasing and negotiation, would add up to significant savings.
As it has for its HIV
drugs, Gilead plans to provide patient assistance within the U.S., to license the
drug (for a fee) to select
generic manufacturers outside the U.S., and to lower
prices in low - and middle - income countries.
However, because the gains which have been made
in reducing health care spending are largely attributable to
price dynamics (such as reduced or no growth
in physician reimbursement rates, and high use of cheaper
generic drugs), the authors warn that any future economic recovery might reverse the progress that has been made
in recent years.
Although
generic ARV
prices have plummeted to as little as $ 100 per person for a year's treatment, the report also notes that when people develop
drug - resistant viruses and need «second - line treatments,» it's much more expensive;
in high - income countries, the cost can run up to $ 6000 per month.
In spite of all the efforts to raise awareness and address the problem of fake
drugs, a major complication remains:
Generic drugs, as well as branded
drugs, are often produced overseas and many are sold online, which saves cost and can bring the
price of medication down, making it affordable to many people.
And because
generics are available only for
drugs whose patent has run out, the competition
in the marketplace among manufacturers drives the
price down.
We were originally attracted to TEVA because of its leading position
in generic drugs, its free cash flow generation from its branded
drug division, its recent dividend growth, and its cheap
price to our estimation of its intrinsic value.
Generic drugs are very cheap
in Thailand but unless you already have an idea of how much you should be paying, you will be charged double or triple the real
price.
Dr. Hill's work has included serving as trial counsel for plaintiffs and defendants
in patent infringement suits involving breast and ovarian cancer gene tests, radiology informatics, hospital information systems, orthopedic surgical devices, MRI diffusion tensor imaging,
generic drugs in Hatch - Waxman patent litigation, and biologics
in suits brought under the Biologics
Price Competition and Innovation Act.
Currently represents a U.S. company
in the Department of Justice's criminal investigation of
price fixing of
generic drugs
[11]
In order to stop this inflationary effect on generic drug prices, in 2006, the Ontario Drug Benefit Act, the Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act, and the Regulations under them were amended to prohibit rebate
In order to stop this inflationary effect on
generic drug prices, in 2006, the Ontario Drug Benefit Act, the Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act, and the Regulations under them were amended to prohibit reba
drug prices,
in 2006, the Ontario Drug Benefit Act, the Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act, and the Regulations under them were amended to prohibit rebate
in 2006, the Ontario
Drug Benefit Act, the Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act, and the Regulations under them were amended to prohibit reba
Drug Benefit Act, the
Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act, and the Regulations under them were amended to prohibit reba
Drug Interchangeability and Dispensing Fee Act, and the Regulations under them were amended to prohibit rebates.
[10] Prior to 2006, the
price at which manufacturers could apply to list
generic drugs in the Formulary was capped by regulations under the Actsat effectively 63 % of the
price of the brand - name
drug.
In such patients, low priced generic risk pills that combine aspirin with a statin drug in order to reduce cholesterol and lower blood pressure can bring down the chances of suffering another stroke or even dying by two - third
In such patients, low
priced generic risk pills that combine aspirin with a statin
drug in order to reduce cholesterol and lower blood pressure can bring down the chances of suffering another stroke or even dying by two - third
in order to reduce cholesterol and lower blood pressure can bring down the chances of suffering another stroke or even dying by two - thirds.
The reforms follow an agreement with the
generic medicines sector and an
in - principle agreement with the proprietary medicines sector and the Government said they would see a 50 % drop
in prices for common
drugs.