The representation of cloud processes
in global atmospheric models has been recognized for decades as the source of much of the uncertainty surrounding predictions of climate variability.
The most commonly used method for representing lightning
in global atmospheric models generally predicts lightning increases in a warmer world.
To help introduce myself, I'm starting with a post on a topic that I've been working on recently: the simulation of tropical cyclones
in global atmospheric models.
Now that it is possible to simulate the Madden Julian Oscillation (MJO) signal explicitly
in global atmospheric models, hypotheses about what controls observed relationships between sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and the MJO can be explored.
Anthropogenic fugitive, combustion and industrial dust is a significant, underrepresented fine particulate matter source
in global atmospheric models.
Although I was unable to demostrate the effect of this modification in the single column model, after returning from Korea I implemented this same scheme
in a global atmospheric model and produced some interesting results.
Not exact matches
And by carefully measuring and
modeling the resulting changes
in atmospheric composition, scientists could improve their estimate of how sensitive Earth's climate is to CO2, said lead author Joyce Penner, a professor of
atmospheric science at the University of Michigan whose work focuses on improving
global climate
models and their ability to
model the interplay between clouds and aerosol particles.
«Which of those is correct at this stage is unknown, but the droughts being driven by
atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations is
in line with some of these
global circulation
models,» Lewis said.
«Advances
in global climate
models and high quality ocean,
atmospheric and land observations are helping us push the frontiers of snowpack prediction.»
After confirming that oxidized organics are involved
in the formation and growth of particles under
atmospheric conditions, the scientists incorporated their findings into a
global particle formation
model.
Their findings, based on output from four
global climate
models of varying ocean and
atmospheric resolution, indicate that ocean temperature
in the U.S. Northeast Shelf is projected to warm twice as fast as previously projected and almost three times faster than the
global average.
Consequently the
global climate
in these
models becomes less sensitive
in its response to
atmospheric carbon dioxide.
The results from the experiments were incorporated into a
global atmospheric model to assess the impact of ELVOC on the particle formation and growth
in the atmosphere.
An international group of
atmospheric chemists and physicist could now have solved another piece
in the climate puzzle by means of laboratory experiments and
global model simulations.
They were Jorge Sarmiento, an oceanographer at Princeton University who constructs ocean - circulation
models that calculate how much
atmospheric carbon dioxide eventually goes into the world's oceans; Eileen Claussen, executive director of the Pew Center for
Global Climate Change in Washington, D.C.; and David Keith, a physicist with the University of Calgary in Alberta who designs technological solutions to the global warming pr
Global Climate Change
in Washington, D.C.; and David Keith, a physicist with the University of Calgary
in Alberta who designs technological solutions to the
global warming pr
global warming problem.
The
model is supported by observations from satellites, ground - based networks that measure ozone - depleting chemicals
in the real world, and by observations from two decades of NASA aircraft field campaigns, including the most recent Airborne Tropical Tropopause Experiment (ATTREX)
in 2013 and the
Atmospheric Tomography (ATom)
global atmospheric survey, which has made three deployments since 2016.
Sally, who was nominated by Dr. Beat Schmid, Associate Director,
Atmospheric Sciences and
Global Change Division, was honored for her exceptional contribution
in the field of
atmospheric science, particularly
in her efforts to improve understanding of the radiative effect of clouds and aerosols on the Earth's atmosphere and their representation
in climate
models.
The Hadley Centre has calculated the massive increase
in atmospheric CO2 levels if the Amazon was to die back as a result of
global warming (climate
models differ on how likely this is, I understand).
Results: Researchers at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory —
in collaboration with NERSC, Argonne National Laboratory, and Cray — recently achieved an effective aggregate IO bandwidth of 5 Gigabytes / sec for writing output from a
global atmospheric model to shared files on DOE's «Franklin,» a 39,000 - processor Cray XT4 supercomputer located at NERSC.
Methods: Researchers Drs. Samson M. Hagos and L. Ruby Leung,
atmospheric scientists at PNNL, surveyed tropical divergence
in three
global climate
models, three
global reanalyses (
models corrected with observational data), and four sets of field campaign soundings.
Because small - scale climate features, such as clouds and
atmospheric aerosol particles, have a large impact on
global climate, it's important to improve the methods used to represent those climate features
in the
models.
From an instantaneous doubling of
atmospheric CO2 content from the pre-industrial base level, some
models would project 2 °C (3.6 °F) of
global warming
in less than a decade while others would project that it would take more than a century to achieve that much warming.
In contrast, chemistry modeling and paleoclimate records [222] show that trace gases increase with global warming, making it unlikely that overall atmospheric CH4 will decrease even if a decrease is achieved in anthropogenic CH4 source
In contrast, chemistry
modeling and paleoclimate records [222] show that trace gases increase with
global warming, making it unlikely that overall
atmospheric CH4 will decrease even if a decrease is achieved
in anthropogenic CH4 source
in anthropogenic CH4 sources.
Our estimate is based primarily on our review of a series of calculations with three - dimensional
models of the
global atmospheric circulation, which is summarized
in Chapter 4.
The
model is analogue to: Increase
in global average
atmospheric temperature (K) = Effect from CO2 (K / ppm CO2) * Increase
in CO2 level (ppm CO2)
3) Simpler
models can be designed to fit many aspects of the
global temperature time series, or the most straightforward aspects of the
atmospheric dynamics (Q - G
models with dry physics for instance)(See Held, 2005
in BAMS for more examples).
In sensitivity experiments the influence of removed orography of Greenland on the Arctic flow patterns and cyclone tracks during winter have been determined using a
global coupled
model and a dynamical downscaling with the regional
atmospheric model HIRHAM.
Mike's work, like that of previous award winners, is diverse, and includes pioneering and highly cited work
in time series analysis (an elegant use of Thomson's multitaper spectral analysis approach to detect spatiotemporal oscillations
in the climate record and methods for smoothing temporal data), decadal climate variability (the term «Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation» or «AMO» was coined by Mike
in an interview with Science's Richard Kerr about a paper he had published with Tom Delworth of GFDL showing evidence
in both climate
model simulations and observational data for a 50 - 70 year oscillation
in the climate system; significantly Mike also published work with Kerry Emanuel
in 2006 showing that the AMO concept has been overstated as regards its role
in 20th century tropical Atlantic SST changes, a finding recently reaffirmed by a study published
in Nature),
in showing how changes
in radiative forcing from volcanoes can affect ENSO,
in examining the role of solar variations
in explaining the pattern of the Medieval Climate Anomaly and Little Ice Age, the relationship between the climate changes of past centuries and phenomena such as Atlantic tropical cyclones and
global sea level, and even a bit of work
in atmospheric chemistry (an analysis of beryllium - 7 measurements).
The work is an estimate of the
global average based on a single - column, time - average
model of the atmosphere and surface (with some approximations — e.g. the surface is not truly a perfect blackbody
in the LW (long - wave) portion of the spectrum (the wavelengths dominated by terrestrial /
atmospheric emission, as opposed to SW radiation, dominated by solar radiation), but it can give you a pretty good idea of things (fig 1 shows a spectrum of radiation to space); there is also some comparison to actual measurements.
Back
in atmospheric physics, chaotic behaviour is a highly - studied and well - understood phenomenon of all realistic
global models, arising directly from the nonlinearity of the Navier - Stokes equations for fluid flow.
The approximately 20 - year lag (between
atmospheric CO2 concentration change and reaching equilibrium temperature) is an emerging property (just like sensitivity) of the
global climate system
in the GCM
models used
in the paper I linked to above, if I understood it correctly.
In other words, the fundamental reason scientists think
atmospheric CO2 strongly affects the
global temperature is not climate
model output — it's just * basic radiative physics *!
To better determine the fate of the species
in the face of climate change, the researchers analyzed a total of 34 different
global climate
models, taking into account
atmospheric sensitivity to greenhouse gases and different levels of human greenhouse gas emissions.
However, as
in the FAR, because climate scientists at the time believed a doubling of
atmospheric CO2 would cause a larger
global heat imbalance than current estimates, the actual «best estimate»
model sensitivity was closer to 2.1 °C for doubled CO2.
As shown
in Figure 2, the IPCC FAR ran simulations using
models with climate sensitivities (the total amount of
global surface warming
in response to a doubling of
atmospheric CO2, including amplifying and dampening feedbacks) correspoding to 1.5 °C (low), 2.5 °C (best), and 4.5 °C (high).
Value - added products (VAPs) are higher - order data products that have been analyzed and processed to ease scientist's use of ARM data
in atmospheric research and
global climate
models.
Type 2 dynamic downscaling refers to regional weather (or climate) simulations
in which the regional
model's initial
atmospheric conditions are forgotten (i.e., the predictions do not depend on the specific initial conditions), but results still depend on the lateral boundary conditions from a
global numerical weather prediction where initial observed
atmospheric conditions are not yet forgotten, or are from a
global reanalysis.
Evidence
in support of the hypothesis that increasing
atmospheric carbon dioxide MUST inevitably lead to an increase
in global temperature exists only
in the
Models.
Type 3 dynamic downscaling takes lateral boundary conditions from a
global model prediction forced by specified real world surface boundary conditions, such as for seasonal weather predictions based on observed sea surface temperatures, but the initial observed
atmospheric conditions
in the
global model are forgotten.
The
models make
atmospheric CO2 concentration the cause of warming, but fail to account for either the solubility effect of CO2
in water, the intense outgassing
in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific, or the effects of climatologists» formula for the residence time of
atmospheric CO2 (it's quite short - lived (~ 1.5 years), not long - lived (decades to centuries), and its lumpy
in the atmosphere, not
global).
In a comparison of 17 computer models of world climate, all predict global warming will kick in over Antarctica, and most indicate temperatures in the interior of the continent will rise faster than in the rest of the world, said Dr. Benjamin D. Santer, an atmospheric scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laborator
In a comparison of 17 computer
models of world climate, all predict
global warming will kick
in over Antarctica, and most indicate temperatures in the interior of the continent will rise faster than in the rest of the world, said Dr. Benjamin D. Santer, an atmospheric scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laborator
in over Antarctica, and most indicate temperatures
in the interior of the continent will rise faster than in the rest of the world, said Dr. Benjamin D. Santer, an atmospheric scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laborator
in the interior of the continent will rise faster than
in the rest of the world, said Dr. Benjamin D. Santer, an atmospheric scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laborator
in the rest of the world, said Dr. Benjamin D. Santer, an
atmospheric scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
My research is
in Dr. Gudrun Magnusdottir's
Modeling Lab, where we are trying to understand the critical relationships between external processes and
atmospheric / oceanic circulations on the
global climate system.
Emissions of other short - lived gases (CO, NOx, NMVOCs, and CH4) also needed to be mapped to a
global grid for use
in atmospheric chemistry
models.
Mathematical physicist Enting (author of the Australian Mathematical Scences Institute book Twisted: The distorted mathematics of greenhouse denial) worked at Australia's leading science agency, the CSIRO, for 24 years
in atmospheric research and
modelling of the
global carbon cycle.
Because the isotopic signatures measured
in the study are lower than the values typically entered into
global climate change
models, the results of this study suggest the
models may be underestimating the change to
atmospheric carbon - 13 for each simulated emissions scenario.
The Earth's response to changes
in atmospheric CO2 is studied using what are known as
global climate
models (GCMs), which run on supercomputers.
Metzger et al. (NRL Stennis Space Center), 5.0 (3.4 - 6.0),
Modeling The
Global Ocean Forecast System (GOFS) 3.1 was run
in forecast mode without data assimilation, initialized with July 1, 2015 ice / ocean analyses, for ten simulations using National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR)
atmospheric forcing fields from 2005 - 2014.
«The authors write that North Pacific Decadal Variability (NPDV) «is a key component
in predictability studies of both regional and
global climate change,»... they emphasize that given the links between both the PDO and the NPGO with
global climate, the accurate characterization and the degree of predictability of these two modes
in coupled climate
models is an important «open question
in climate dynamics» that needs to be addressed... report that
model - derived «temporal and spatial statistics of the North Pacific Ocean modes exhibit significant discrepancies from observations
in their twentieth - century climate... conclude that «for implications on future climate change, the coupled climate
models show no consensus on projected future changes
in frequency of either the first or second leading pattern of North Pacific SST anomalies,» and they say that «the lack of a consensus
in changes
in either mode also affects confidence
in projected changes
in the overlying
atmospheric circulation.»»
After a two - year postdoctoral appointment
modeling global sources and sinks of
atmospheric CO2, he spent two years as an Assistant Professor
in the Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at the University of California at Santa Barbara.
The response of
atmospheric CO2 and climate to the reconstructed variability
in solar irradiance and radiative forcing by volcanoes over the last millennium is examined by applying a coupled physical — biogeochemical climate
model that includes the Lund - Potsdam - Jena dynamic
global vegetation
model (LPJ - DGVM) and a simplified analogue of a coupled atmosphere — ocean general circulation
model.