and Christs prayer «forgive them, they know not what they are doing», is God's prayer,
in human essence, at the time where he was murdered by our sin.
Not exact matches
In essence and in theory, the human brain is capable of solving and computing problems much quicker than a computer.&raqu
In essence and
in theory, the human brain is capable of solving and computing problems much quicker than a computer.&raqu
in theory, the
human brain is capable of solving and computing problems much quicker than a computer.»
With his record running times, Bolt stretched the limits of
human achievement, sending physicists scrambling to explain what made him so special ----
in essence, his longer, stronger legs create more ground force to propel him forward ---- and ponder the possibility of anyone on the planet ever running faster.
Kathy Bloomgarden, CEO of Ruder Finn, wrote a compelling article
in Fortune about how the healthcare industry is slowly losing the very
essence of healthcare:
human connection.
Friendship, and that includes friendship with God, comes from a deeper level
in the
human person, deeper than feelings, deeper than logic, from the very
essence of what it means to be a person.
The all out denying of ID puts
humans in line with the animal herds giving humanisms as being but animalisms without a cause to be any different
in the habitualized
essences.
The
human element
in religion is imperfect and flawed; there is no shame
in admitting this, for reason can help refine religious passion: «Religions need always to be purified according to their true
essence in order to correspond to their true mission.»
The
essence of all religions is to be good and do good but sometimes people get carried away by
human frailty that results
in undesirable actions.
Basically, God is a relational being within himself and that «community» is illustrated
in the family and
in the
essence of every
human.
Third, it was the tradition of Christian humanism which led the White Rose to see the
essence of the anti-humanism of the Nazis
in their disregard for the sanctity of individual
human life.
To that assessment this essay will contribute modestly by arguing (1) that an account of experience must be compatible with the fact that there is no one thing which is what experience is or is the
essence of experience, (2) that no philosophically adequate account of what experience is can be established merely by appeal to direct, personal, intuitive experience of one's own experience, (3) that generalization from features found
in human experience is not sufficient to justify the claim that temporality is essential to experience, but (4) that dialectical argument rather than intuition or generalization is necessary to support the claim that experience is essentially temporal.
I have contended further that one can not know what the
essence of experience is, or whether temporality is a part of it, merely through generalization of features found
in human experience.
The value of
human dignity, which takes precedence over all political action and all political decision - making, refers to the Creator: Only He can establish values that are grounded
in the
essence of humankind and are inviolable.
Without ceasing to be itself charity enlarges its scope to become an upward - lifting force, a common
essence, at the heart of every form of
human endeavour, whose diversity tends
in consequence to be drawn together
in synthesis into the rich totality of a single operation.
There would be no need to «make» God share
in man's adventure or be affected by
human actions according to Whitehead, for such is the nature of God: «Decay, Transition, Loss, Displacement belong to the
essence of Creative Advance» (Al 368 - 69).
All
human experiences, even those which seem most solitary, are actually interpersonal
in their
essence.
Christianity
in its
essence does not look upon sex as something which belongs to the lowest part of
human nature, but as a power which leads to one of the highest forms of communion.
In very personal language, I believe that all things are progressing from the same divine source; that that source is the ground of all being and its essence is love and interdependence; that all human beings (all of life, really) are equal and beloved in its sight; that in response to that overarching, boundless love which ensures that no one is ever truly alone, I have a responsibility to assist in the creation of just and loving community here on Eart
In very personal language, I believe that all things are progressing from the same divine source; that that source is the ground of all being and its
essence is love and interdependence; that all
human beings (all of life, really) are equal and beloved
in its sight; that in response to that overarching, boundless love which ensures that no one is ever truly alone, I have a responsibility to assist in the creation of just and loving community here on Eart
in its sight; that
in response to that overarching, boundless love which ensures that no one is ever truly alone, I have a responsibility to assist in the creation of just and loving community here on Eart
in response to that overarching, boundless love which ensures that no one is ever truly alone, I have a responsibility to assist
in the creation of just and loving community here on Eart
in the creation of just and loving community here on Earth.
As late as 1931 Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes was saying that «the
essence of religion is belief
in a relation to God involving duties superior to those arising from any
human relation.»
The secret of all spiritual religion is the union of the
human soul with the divine soul, the belief that man's spirit and God's spirit are
in their
essence one.
To the extent that the man - made setting of man's life and the setting which was naturally antecedent to
human freedom are specifically different, the latter being characteristic of earlier times and the former of the present, we are now living
in a setting which almost
in its very
essence is more complicated and intractable and inaccessible to the understanding of the individual than was ever the case before.
The second point is that it has been of the very
essence of the Christian faith to have brought to light the role of faith
in the
human situation.
With variation, but
in essential correspondence of members of the plot, it happened of course throughout the spreading
human family
in the centuries and years, perhaps even months or days, preceding; and it has most assuredly continued to happen,
in its significant
essence, with persistence and always accompanying
human carnage down to our own time and decade and, who knows, even day and hour.
Did you ever think when you are typing words, gathering your thoughts, deciding / choosing what to say, and using the best intellect you can find
in your brain; that you are conscious
in these thoughts / decisions, and that your eyes / hands / brain synapses, are all part of the lense (of the
human body) that you are able to see and control to the limitations inherent
in its
essence?
The fact that
humans inflict harm upon themselves and others is
in no means a reflection of the
essence of the religion they follow especially if they are not PRACTICING!
For evangelizing,
in its
essence, is taking the authentic Christian gospel (albeit with the limitations of
human understanding) through word or deed to those who need it and are at least prepared enough to take a look at it.
This was vividly brought home to me recently, reading the vast work of academic moral philosophy On What Matters, by Derek Parfit,
in which problems concerning the switching of trolleys from one rail to another
in order to prevent or cause the deaths of those further down the line are presented as showing the
essence of moral reasoning and its place
in the life of
human beings.
while the Aristotelian worldview conceiving the reality as existing within the purview of
human rationality
in a synthetic framework of form and
essence made the rational epistemology possible.
And similarly, is that not also the
essence in the
human's New Covenant choice
in which Christ is the way, the truth, and the life?
Can we reconceive theological education
in such a way that (1) it clearly pertains to the totality of
human life,
in the public sphere as well as the private, because it bears on all of our powers; (2) it is adequate to genuine pluralism, both of the «Christian thing» and of the worlds
in which the «Christian thing» is lived, by avoiding naiveté about historical and cultural conditioning without lapsing into relativism; (3) it can be the unifying overarching goal of theological education without requiring the tacit assumption that there is a universal structure or
essence to education
in general, or theological inquiry
in particular, which inescapably denies genuine pluralism by claiming to be the universal common denominator to which everything may be reduced as variations on a theme; and (4) it can retrieve the strengths of both the «Athens» and the «Berlin» types of excellent schooling, without unintentionally subordinating one to the other?
Wood neither assumes nor implies any claims about an «
essence» that is universal to all
human beings
in every time and place and that is constitutive of our humanity.
It seems the most likely scenario is that he married his sister or less likely his niece.The reasoning is that Adam and Eve lived alot longer and continued to have sons and daughters GEN5: 4 aCTS 17:26 Paul tells us that the God who made the world hath made of one blood all nations of man to dwell on all the face of the earth.Cain did nt marry to another tribe or nation as every man and women was a relative and of the same bloodline of Adam and Eve.The importance of this is that sin entered through one man Adam and is past through the bloodline so redemption is only possible through the same bloodline.So for the formula to work the
human genome had to stay the same no other tribes or nations just the descendents of Adam and Eve.It also solves another riddle
in that satan at various times prior to the flood and after the flood tried to contaminate the bloodline by his angels having sexual relations with the women this created a type of alien
in essence and would have not been able to have been redeemed by the blood of Jesus as it wasnt fully
human.This is where the giants came from and why God wanted to destroy them as they had the potential to destroy the
human race as they couldnt be redeemed by the blood of Jesus.Interesting?
As he explained
in his 1961 book The New
Essence of Christianity, it marked the end of
human adolescence and the beginning of our moral maturity.
What Scripture says of the first
human being would then be simply the permanently valid statement concerning man
in general, even if this were also «historical»,
in the sense that it does not express a necessary
essence of man but what always happens, although it need not have done so.
But the experienced quality, the «being of worth,» is not itself a matter of
human decision, for the
essence of value, as distinguished from desire, is precisely the power of evoking devotion and of transforming persons
in conformity with its own pattern.
Yet such assumptions,
in themselves, contradict the method of economic development and defeat its purpose, which is,
in essence, the extension of
human choice.
Very differently, The
Essence of Religion locates the subjective source of religion
in human dependence on nature.
For the talk about the natural changes of
human life over the years, together with what externally happened there, is not
in essence any different from talking of plant or of animal life.
The central thought
in The
Essence of Christianity is that the supposedly superhuman deities of religion are actually the involuntary projections of the essential attributes of
human nature.
The
essence of the message is that
in and through the Cross, where all
human hope is silenced and all
human dreams are vanquished, God speaks the Word of life
in death.»
Yet we know that all
human constructions
in which we try to grasp this
essence are inadequate.
«The
essence of being
human,» he wrote, «is... that one is prepared
in the end to be defeated and broken up by life, which is the inevitable price of fastening one's love upon other
human individuals.»
The
essence of Christian faith is even consistent with unqualified commitment to revolutionary struggle
in the name of
human beings against the forces of alienation.
For Niebuhr, the dimension of freedom was the most significant element
in human nature; it is the
essence of man
in the image of God.
One of these is that
human history is the arena of competitive power, and that therefore it contradicts
in its
essence the order of love.
In one life, which arose in the midst of that people, God uttered His truth and spirit in such a way that His love, which is His very essence, became known and operative in human history with transforming powe
In one life, which arose
in the midst of that people, God uttered His truth and spirit in such a way that His love, which is His very essence, became known and operative in human history with transforming powe
in the midst of that people, God uttered His truth and spirit
in such a way that His love, which is His very essence, became known and operative in human history with transforming powe
in such a way that His love, which is His very
essence, became known and operative
in human history with transforming powe
in human history with transforming power.
He argued that while each
human being has a very tiny life span, or finite appearance
in the whole of space - time of the universe, humanity is also an eternal intelligible
essence.
«Wherever applause breaks out
in the liturgy because of some
human achievement, it is a sure sign that the
essence of liturgy has totally disappeared and been replaced by a kind of religious entertainment.»
In another sense, it is also true to say that existence precedes essence, and the metaphysical view is consequently wrong in denying it, for essence in this case is defined within the world of interpersonal relationships, within the world of history and human society, within the world of reason itself which Teilhard would call the noospher
In another sense, it is also true to say that existence precedes
essence, and the metaphysical view is consequently wrong
in denying it, for essence in this case is defined within the world of interpersonal relationships, within the world of history and human society, within the world of reason itself which Teilhard would call the noospher
in denying it, for
essence in this case is defined within the world of interpersonal relationships, within the world of history and human society, within the world of reason itself which Teilhard would call the noospher
in this case is defined within the world of interpersonal relationships, within the world of history and
human society, within the world of reason itself which Teilhard would call the noosphere.
As it was pointed out by Olof Klohr of Jena, «The atheism of Marxism is,
in essence, not the «No» to religion and God, but the «Yes» to the world, the «Yes» to the conscious formation of
human life.