They see modernism as the legacy of the Enlightenment, with its absolute faith
in human reason and its supreme confidence that human endeavor can steadily make progress towards an ultimate goal which promises final knowledge and complete human fulfillment.
With advances in the natural sciences and mathematics, the eighteenth century saw a new confidence
in human reason and a rejection of what was considered superstitious.
It dismantles Greek cosmology and Christian revelation alike, yet retains the confidence
in human reason which characterized the one and the hope for a fulfilled future that is derived from the other.
Something constructive must be left
in human reason and conscience if man is to have a basis for a collective life with a measure of justice and sanity.
But Sen's only hope for this essential self «transcendence is his belief
in human reason» plus the «evolutionary selection of behavioral modes.»
With all due respect, I must say that the experience of the last violent century, with its widespread faith
in human reason and evolutionary progress, hardly warrants optimism about transcending selfishness on those grounds.
They argued against the despotism of God as well as against determinism and fatalism and put their whole trust
in human reason, which to them was sacred.
It is a shift in theological method from locating the basis of authority in the objective written Word of God to placing
it in human reason and experience.
Now, there must be something radically inadequate
in this human reason which arrives at two radically opposed conclusions.
By the mid-1990s, Krueger began to wonder about the value of finding mistakes
in human reasoning.
Not exact matches
That, he said Tuesday, is much of the
reason he founded SpaceX: After
humans successfully landed on the moon
in the late 60s and early 70s, progress stalled out.
In a non-union environment, employers can dump employees any time, for virtually any
reason as long as it doesn't violate
human rights laws.
Accounts payable and anything
in human resources were out as well, for many of the same
reasons.
But understanding the
reasons behind the
human need to avoid fault and feel validated is only the first step
in reversing the credit - and - blame cycle.
Cycorp charged itself with figuring out the tens of millions of pieces of data we rely on as
humans — the knowledge that helps us understand the world — and to represent them
in a formal way that machines can use to
reason.
Steve Mitchell, whose Fox 2 / Mitchell poll
in Michigan found Clinton with an identical 5 - point lead heading into Election Day, chalked up his miss to a very specific
reason:
Human error.
As humorist Dave Barry once remarked, «If you had to identify,
in one word, the
reason why the
human race has not achieved, and never will achieve, its full potential, that word would be «meetings.»»
David Clarke, senior vice president of technology development at Workday (wday), which specializes
in financial and
human resources software for big companies, agreed that expanding geographic reach is a big
reason to consider public cloud.
They don't see those efforts as mutually exclusive, and it's perhaps for that
reason that some HR departments, particularly
in the tech world, have recently undergone some of their own internal rebranding, shedding the stodgy old «
human resources» name
in favor of friendlier and more inviting monikers like People Operations (Google, Southwest Airlines), Employee Experience (Airbnb), and Employee Success (Salesforce).
But the move appears not to be going on planned,
in part for a
reason that could have been anticipated: AI technology is, like people, prone to bias — a bias as
human as the political leanings of an editor, but coming from different sources.
Color plays a significant role
in human psychology, and up to 85 percent of consumers list color as a top
reason for purchasing a product.
The specialization begins with a foundational course that considers alternative approaches to managing
human resources, provides a background to the U.S. legal context
in which employees are hired, fired, rewarded, and managed, and outlines the different
reasons that people are motivated to work.
The
reason is that, as Geoff Colvin points out
in Humans Are Underrated, we increasingly need humans to do jobs that machines can't, chiefly working with other h
Humans Are Underrated, we increasingly need
humans to do jobs that machines can't, chiefly working with other h
humans to do jobs that machines can't, chiefly working with other
humanshumans.
It is a lesson of
human experience whether the issue is playground bullying, Enron or Europe
in the 1930s that the worst outcomes occur when good people find
reasons to accommodate themselves to what they know is wrong.
«Liberalism, socialism, and pragmatism may all be termed optimistic
in the sense that they are all premised on the idea that the application of
reason to
human social and political conditions will ultimately result
in the melioration of these conditions.
While our web - based stock screener is a fantastic time saver
in steadily trending markets, markets
in transition require the added interaction of
human discretion, which is one of the key
reasons traders subscribe to -LSB-...]
That's a pretty huge steelman
in that it undoes most of this post, since all
reasoning we can do then comes from analogies like animals:
humans::
humans: AI.
«Groups working together functioning correctly are immensely rational — it's the
reason humans evolved
in tribes.
They eliminate the factors associated with
human trading since they trade without any attached feelings and they, therefore, don't suffer from greed which is the main
reason behind the losses that most binary options traders
in the world make.
There are a variety of
reasons for this gap
in understanding: The time gap between discovery research and the translation of that discovery into a therapeutic or a commercial product can take decades, and public and political attention spans are short; the natural
human inclination is to pay more attention to things that don't work rather than things that do.
The idea is that we, as
humans, act
in predictable ways; a
reason why history repeats itself so often.
But others, like Paul Krugman, who
in 1998 predicted that the Internet's impact on the economy would be no greater than the fax machine's, were dead wrong, though for understandable
reasons.11 Timelines for the adoption and extension of new technologies are inherently unpredictable, primarily because their ultimate impact will be a result of how
humans interact with them.
This occurred for a number of
reasons, but chief among them were larger investments
in physical and
human capital, greater technological advancement and greater productivity growth.
But it is one thing to state that all
human beings have some access to God's law within and through
human nature, quite another to expect natural law theories based on
reason alone to persuade others about contested moral issues
in a context where such theories are stripped of their foundations
in God as creator, lawgiver, and judge.
Both are instances of ignorance
in logical
reasoning and understanding of science especially
in regards to
human nature.
The fact of the matter is, the cross remains
in human consciousness for one
reason «the resurrection that succeeded it.
So how do you go from that
reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill
in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of
humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».
Moreover, it is a truth accessible to
reason unaided by divine revelation that
human beings have a spiritual nature,
in the sense of being rational and free and having a soul that is not reducible to matter.
Your arguments about mistreatment being a
reason to not believe
in ID is akin to an alien coming to earth and pointing at an insane asylum as a
reason for believing all
humans are mentally handicapped.
So, by your
reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse
in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing
in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «
human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to
in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart
in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.
Nick, arrogance
in the extreme is claiming to understand God's motives,
reasons & justifications or personifying him with
human emotions like jealousy, vanity & vengance... Between athiests & believers, who do you think does this?
This general revelation, which makes itself manifest
in certain universal moral principles, is one that is most immediately accessible to
human reason.
Religion
in this case was people hearing the very real loving voices of other people, inspired to love one another for whatever
reasons they might think they have, and attaching themselves to that love
in order to deal emotionally with the struggles we face just by being
human.
The
human element
in religion is imperfect and flawed; there is no shame
in admitting this, for
reason can help refine religious passion: «Religions need always to be purified according to their true essence
in order to correspond to their true mission.»
Might the
reason be that belief
in human perfectibility has taken so many hard knocks over the last several thousand years?
Additional
reasons might be given for The United Methodist Church to rid itself of a commitment to abortion rights: the increasing numbers of African delegates (who are,
in the main, pro-life) to General Conference; the horrifyingly high abortion rates (though the annual totals are continuing to decrease)
in the United States; the pro-life drift of American public opinion (which United Methodism seems to follow); the uncommon clarity of ecumenical teaching on the dignity of the
human person; and the providence of God.
In other words, a properly ordered will (one that leads toward good things in good measure) following closely on the heels of right reason (one that perceives and presents to the will goods really perfective of the human person) goes a long way to putting the passions in their place (which is not, emphatically, squashed way down into a virtual black hole
In other words, a properly ordered will (one that leads toward good things
in good measure) following closely on the heels of right reason (one that perceives and presents to the will goods really perfective of the human person) goes a long way to putting the passions in their place (which is not, emphatically, squashed way down into a virtual black hole
in good measure) following closely on the heels of right
reason (one that perceives and presents to the will goods really perfective of the
human person) goes a long way to putting the passions
in their place (which is not, emphatically, squashed way down into a virtual black hole
in their place (which is not, emphatically, squashed way down into a virtual black hole).
I believe this dominance has held
humans back as a race and is the very
reason for all the problems
in the world today.
Still, at the end of the day, when the atrocities
in Bosnia and elsewhere make one despair of
human perfectibility, of moderation, of a universal moral law based on
reason, reading so fine, learned, and humane a book is, if not a consolation, at least a relief.
The
reason Jesus had to become a man was because of the nature of God and the nature of man; God required a perfect
human to shed sinless blood
in order to redeem humanity.