Sentences with phrase «in illogical arguments»

Sad to see that you persist in illogical arguments when your fallacies have been shown to you.

It's why they are used as pawns in this illogical argument.

Not exact matches

This is a simple illogical argument one can learn about in first year of University.

Those are what are known as fallacious arguments because they are illogical in nature.

If someone is making a screamingly illogical argument, cite that fact in your own free speech to defeat that thought in the minds of others.

Very nice to hear such reasonable thinking in a sea of incoherent an illogical religious arguments.

Kind of like getting into a serious and heated argument with someone that believes in Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny... beyond illogical.

His arguments are devoid of facts, and his masquerade as a scientist, or whatever, is galling» «attempting to debunk the integrity of the bible, and glorify the theory of evolution is simply a tactic to lure unsuspecting seekers to abandon reason and science in order to embrace an illogical, unverifiable, subjective based explanation of the universe.

Speaking to them is frustrating in the moment but, when I review their dependence upon the same, tired, catch phrase, illogical arguments, it only reaffirms that my position is correct.

This «costliest ticket in the PL / UK / Europe / world» mantra is a real balls - ache of a dull, illogical argument.

This post serves to be an objective counterweight to my last post — though most arguments against calorie counting (or calories in general) are unfounded, illogical, or outright nonsensical, there are some legitimate downsides that deserve thoughtful consideration.

The Yes on 8 viewpoint manifests in commercials and grainy C - Span footage with illogical, even comical, arguments.

Alexandra, And a review of the posts of Victoria Strauss ALSO shows that the people who follow her around on the message boards are like mindless cult members, impervious to reason and lacking both judgment and basic logic skills, and often try to make completely illogical claims and arguments in a hopeless attempt to redeem their leader.

There's a lot of reading comprehension fail (for example, in this particular case, the illogical inference that noting a problem with Amazon's position a priori means one is on the «side» of Hachette, especially when I've taken pains to note both companies work for their interest, not mine), and it's not my job to wander about the field, gently teaching people how to parse arguments.

And to an investor focused on value investing in the late 1990s, there were plenty of illogical arguments to be found, whether it was a focus on eyeballs (webpage views) over profits, or any other metric that left one reminded of the story about a business losing money on every sale, but making it up on volume.

As described by Michael Lewis in his latest book, The Undoing Project, ``... when Danny heard an illogical argument, he asked, What might that be true of?»

(However just to be clear in case my wife might read this I'm in no way suggesting that all women are illogical, stupid or that they can't present an argument.)

Pity you don't apply your advice to yourself — e.g. in your irrational and illogical arguments about your solar power and energy matters more broadly.

I said it was illogical in that a surprisingly large proportion of the arguments most often advanced in its favour are instances of the dozen commonest fallacies in human discourse, as codified by Aristotle in his Refutations of the Sophists 2350 years ago.

Curry not only takes the extreme range of this — which is illogical since, contorted arguments to argue otherwise aside, she even goes beyond it: to, as quoted above, ludicrously conclude from all this that not only is it not just «reasonably possible» that half could be due to natural variation that just happens to coincide with what we would expect to see from the atmospheric alteration inadvertently undertaken, but that rather than it being somewhere in the middle of up to half being due to variability, or a similarly large portion in fact being veiled, but all of what «could» on the one end of the range be, in fact, IS, but then goes beyond that.

Thanks to Jeff for finding the hole in this argument and debunking the seemingly illogical conclusion in a more recent blog entry.

But it wasn't until the Court turned its attention to the arguments made in an attempt to overturn the Tailoring and Timing Rules that the Court called the arguments «confusing» or indicated that they were entirely illogical.

Jai Mitchell, in a characteristically nasty comment that ignores the ancient logical principle that attacks upon the man rather than his argument are illogical and, therefore, unscientific, imagines (incorrectly) that I. like him, have no background in science.

That's a fatal error, in my view, because it renders his whole mathematical argument illogical and false.

So if, in the middle of an argument, you stop your partner to them they're being illogical, you're probably doing it wrong.

In other words, don't bring up a heated argument only to tell your partner that he or she was wrong to begin with, or that he or she was simply being illogical.

Honesty, but don't tell... Let bygones be, but tally the future... Be reasonable and don't give in to anger, emotions, but adopt these illogical arguments based on their emotional appeal...