Read More Bible buddy, your problem is not your
beliefs in intelligent design its your selective acceptance of the lessons provided by the bible.
To those who believe
in intelligent design.
That said your comment that you can not believe
in intelligent design and be a scientist is completely wrong.
Why is it okay to express your disbelief
in intelligent design but it is not okay to express your belief in intelligent design?
No one claiming to believe
in intelligent design can also claim to be a scientist.
You don't have to believe
in intelligent design to see how there is harassment and discrimination against people for their beliefs.
You can't be a scientist and believe
in intelligent design.
In an area where the majority claims a belief in dialectic materialism (which is a philosophy, not a theory)-- & no, what «evolutionists» claim to believe is not pure Darwinism — & where they refuse any spirit of scientific inquiry when what they believe isn't a theory, even, but a philosophy (of Marx & Engels, BTW), a hostile environment exists AT THE OUTSET for anyone who believes
in intelligent design.
Whether you believe
in intelligent design is irrelevant.
«There is a controversy among scientists about whether evolution is a fact... hundreds and hundreds of scientists, many of them holding Nobel prizes, believe
in intelligent design.»
I believe
in intelligent design but not that he will die and come back to save from our so called sins is the term I think is used.
Simply put, creationism is the belief
in an intelligent design, not randomness, as the source of life.
I don't care if an atheist thinks I'm unintelligent for believing
in intelligent design.
What is interesting about atheists, is that you claime not to believe
in intelligent design and purpose, but you use words like laws, order, process, logic, fundamental, purpose, and so on in your scientific explanation to support your theory of our existence.
«I believe
in intelligent design, lower case i and lower case d,» he writes.
Must go to work, but to get a gauge of just how jaw - droppingly ridiculous the belief
in intelligent design is in the 21st Century, here are some areas they must ignore, any one of which proves beyond rational argument that, not surprisingly, the World did not start about 6,000 years ago at the behest of the Judeo - Christian god, with one man, one woman and a talking snake.
However, I don't have a problem with a professor, discussing the origins of the universe, explaining that many religious beliefs have a belief
in intelligent design, but that it is not within the scope of a science class.
As a devout Christian, Karen is faced with an internal battle that has resonated in the public school system nationwide for the past two years: the belief
in intelligent design versus evolution, and the consequent undermining of the latter.
Sixty - three percent of physicians believe that the theory of evolution is more correct than belief
in intelligent design, according to a recent poll, though the responses vary significantly by religion.