Sentences with phrase «in judicial dispute»

Speaker, «Effective Advocacy in Judicial Dispute Resolutions,» The Legal Education Society of Alberta; 2004.

In a Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) an actual Judge is involved and in a Mediation, a senior lawyer who is also an experienced Mediator is involved.

Represents certain automobile manufacturers in their judicial disputes in Québec.

Not exact matches

In the future, this may increasingly become the legislative and judicial compromise in religious - exemption disputes: The organization will be permitted to demand uniformity of belief but forbidden to discriminate based on any other grounIn the future, this may increasingly become the legislative and judicial compromise in religious - exemption disputes: The organization will be permitted to demand uniformity of belief but forbidden to discriminate based on any other grounin religious - exemption disputes: The organization will be permitted to demand uniformity of belief but forbidden to discriminate based on any other ground.

Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, (but without limiting MomLifeTV's right to seek injunctive or other equitable relief in any court of competent jurisdiction), any disputes arising with respect to this Agreement shall be referred to an arbitrator affiliated with Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service («JAMS»).

The suit concludes that a «dispute exists» over the governor's constitutional authority to force the Legislature to pass non-revenue items in a revenue bill and this «requires a judicial determination of the score of non-apportionment or non-revenue lanuague in Article VII bills.»

«With the foregoing, it is clear that the dispute was sufficiently and conclusively thrashed in both the regular courts and and the judicial institutions of sports.

NLNG in 2013, went to court, seeking a judicial determination of among other things, the legality or otherwise of the levies sought to be imposed on it by NIMASA, and the consequent blockade of the Bonny Channel by NIMASA and its agents as a result of the dispute.

Torres was fired from the elections board in October 2015 in a dispute with Republican leaders after Conservatives made a cross-endorsement deal with Democrats for judicial elections.

Except where excluded by law, any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be finally settled in accordance with the Comprehensive Arbitration Rules of the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service, Inc. («JAMS») by three arbitrators appointed in accordance with such Rules.

«Roy's Rock» was moved last week, but the weight of the dispute over the Ten Commandments monument in the Alabama Judicial Building is likely to shift to Washington in the next few months.

Based on mixed results to date, disputes over the extent to which educational officials can discipline students for misbehavior involving the internet that does not originate in school or on school computers and servers, is one that is likely to receive increased judicial attention.

«(d) ADMINISTRATION OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAMS - Each United States district court shall designate an employee, or a judicial officer, who is knowledgeable in alternative dispute resolution practices and processes to implement, administer, oversee, and evaluate the court's alternative dispute resolution pDISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAMS - Each United States district court shall designate an employee, or a judicial officer, who is knowledgeable in alternative dispute resolution practices and processes to implement, administer, oversee, and evaluate the court's alternative dispute resolution pdispute resolution practices and processes to implement, administer, oversee, and evaluate the court's alternative dispute resolution pdispute resolution program.

Lucas Bergkamp has a new paper in press: Adjudicating scientific disputes in climate science: the limits of judicial competence and the risks of taking sides.

As often in environmental law, in the framework of the Aarhus Convention preference has been given to a non-binding compliance mechanism over a judicial or arbitral system of dispute settlement.

In a nutshell, the Court argued that if a court or tribunal potentially rules on a matter «covered by EU law» (para. 55), and if that court or tribunal is situated outside the EU judicial system, the autonomy of EU law is under threat, even if EU law is only occasionally relevant to the disputes over which arbitral tribunals exercise jurisdiction.

In the abstract, one could present the dispute in question as being rooted in the different answers that may be provided by different judicial methodologies for interpreting the relevant legal sourceIn the abstract, one could present the dispute in question as being rooted in the different answers that may be provided by different judicial methodologies for interpreting the relevant legal sourcein question as being rooted in the different answers that may be provided by different judicial methodologies for interpreting the relevant legal sourcein the different answers that may be provided by different judicial methodologies for interpreting the relevant legal sources.

The public interest demands that the disputes and legal issues brought before the courts be resolved in a timely and effective manner, all the while maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.

We have represented many education institutions for many years in a vast variety of civil litigation matters, including contract disputes, construction disputes, building envelope and environmental separation concerns, maintenance of capital structures, labour issues, defamation, judicial review, and providing defence to educators.

The Competition takes place in March in Washington, D.C. and entails a simulation of a fictional dispute between countries before the International Court of Justice, the judicial organ of the United Nations.

represent you in the legal proceedings best suited to your case, whether that's settlement negotiations, mediation, Judicial Dispute Resolution, a mini-trial or a full trial in court.

You may want to consider judicial review if you were a part of a dispute resolution proceeding at the Residential Tenancy Branch (RTB) which did not go in your favour and you believe that the decision made by the arbitrator at the hearing was unreasonable or unfair.

She has also been instructed by lay litigation friends, including family members and the Refugee Council in possession cases and age dispute judicial reviews.

He specialises in high value domestic and cross-border disputes, including advising on commercial contract disputes, commercial fraud cases, warranty claims, tort claims and judicial reviews.

Because JAMS provides alternative dispute resolution mechanisms that operate in accordance with judicial procedures, we may also deny or limit access to personal data in the following contexts: (i) interference with law enforcement or with private causes of action, including the prevention, investigation or detection of offenses or the right to a fair trial, arbitration or mediation; (ii) disclosure where the legitimate rights or important interests of others would be violated; (iii) breaching a legal or other professional privilege or obligation; (iv) prejudicing employee security investigations or grievance proceedings or in connection with employee succession planning and corporate reorganizations; or (v) prejudicing the confidentiality necessary in monitoring, inspection or regulatory functions connected with sound management, or in future or ongoing negotiations involving JAMS.

He acts in a wide range of social housing disputes, and has particular experience of appearing in judicial reviews.

In cases where disputes have arisen between Canada and First Nations in these areas, the lack of a legislative framework has led some judges to question whether judicial review is even availablIn cases where disputes have arisen between Canada and First Nations in these areas, the lack of a legislative framework has led some judges to question whether judicial review is even availablin these areas, the lack of a legislative framework has led some judges to question whether judicial review is even available.

If it is not possible to resolve the disputes ourselves, then we each agree to resolve those disputes or claims between you and Bootstrap Legal of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to those relating to use of the Site or the quality or appropriateness of services offered by the Bootstrap Legal, shall be resolved by binding arbitration before Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services («JAMS»), rather than in a court of general jurisdiction.

Whether judicial economy would be advanced, in some way, by hearing a case notwithstanding that the concrete dispute has been resolved; and

In a recent speech, however, he said that the task for reformers will be to work out «how far we can properly create a multi-door courthouse that both promotes appropriate dispute resolution whilst ensuring that the court's adjudicatory function is enhanced rather than undermined» so he clearly does not want to throw the judicial baby out with the bathwater.

To help in turn the GC cope with a similar issue, the first EU specialised «judicial panel» was set up in 2005: Known as the EU Civil Service Tribunal (CST), the jurisdiction is exclusively limited to disputes between the EU and its civil servants and consists of 7 judges.

But most of all it is a tale of betrayals of basic sanity on many levels of the judicial system that is entrusted with meting out justice in legal disputes.»

«This Blog is intended to provide timely discussion of judicial and regulatory decisions as well as topics and trends in international litigation, international dispute resolution, and international investigations, regulatory compliance, and enforcement.»

This point is convincing, given the fact that, as the authors point out, the jurisprudence lacks finality in a very real sense: in access to documents cases, EU courts can not serve the institutions injunctions to disclose documents that are subject of the judicial dispute (pp. 7 - 8).

Semantic wranglings aside, the judicial acceptance of imputation as a tool in determining disputes about beneficial shares can only be welcome.

Perhaps, with some limitations or rights to apply to set aside, the recommendations proposed in part 6B could be deemed to be binding if a party does not move to set the matter down for trial within a month or two of the judicial dispute resolution process.

It must be frustrating to be a judge and realize that you have made a mistake, but the judicial process is in place in part to give certainty to dispute resolution.

In Public Access to Documents in the EU, Leonor Rossi and Patricia Vinagre e Silva, respectively professor of EU law at Lisbon's Nova School of Business and Economics, and lawyer in the field of EU administrative law, set out to analyse, systematise and contextualise the more than 200 judicial disputes emerging out of requests for access to documents of the EU institutionIn Public Access to Documents in the EU, Leonor Rossi and Patricia Vinagre e Silva, respectively professor of EU law at Lisbon's Nova School of Business and Economics, and lawyer in the field of EU administrative law, set out to analyse, systematise and contextualise the more than 200 judicial disputes emerging out of requests for access to documents of the EU institutionin the EU, Leonor Rossi and Patricia Vinagre e Silva, respectively professor of EU law at Lisbon's Nova School of Business and Economics, and lawyer in the field of EU administrative law, set out to analyse, systematise and contextualise the more than 200 judicial disputes emerging out of requests for access to documents of the EU institutionin the field of EU administrative law, set out to analyse, systematise and contextualise the more than 200 judicial disputes emerging out of requests for access to documents of the EU institutions.

If consensus is reached at judicial dispute resolution process, judge reads consent order into record in presence of parties.

In arbitration, disputes are resolved with binding effect by a person or persons acting in a judicial manner in private, rather than by a national court of law that would have jurisdiction unless the parties have prior agreement to exclude iIn arbitration, disputes are resolved with binding effect by a person or persons acting in a judicial manner in private, rather than by a national court of law that would have jurisdiction unless the parties have prior agreement to exclude iin a judicial manner in private, rather than by a national court of law that would have jurisdiction unless the parties have prior agreement to exclude iin private, rather than by a national court of law that would have jurisdiction unless the parties have prior agreement to exclude it.

The article discusses the potential impacts of the Senate's sluggish pace in filling federal judicial vacancies have on the ability to resolve key cases, including intellectual property disputes.

I assist clients with issues that arise during bid preparation, and I represent clients in public procurement disputes against governments at all levels (bid challenges, judicial review, civil claims for breach of «contract A / B», etc.).

Finally, courts were asked to explore online dispute resolution systems to relieve the overburdened judicial system and preserve the constitutional role of the courts in dispute resolution.

His experience includes pre-trial litigation, trials and appeals in state and federal courts, judicial and private arbitration, mediation and administrative proceedings in matters ranging in size upwards of multi-million dollar disputes.

And so it could hedge its bets and formulate the norm as prohibiting Member States «to remove from the jurisdiction of their own courts, and hence from the system of judicial remedies which the second subparagraph of Article 19 (1) TEU requires them to establish in the fields covered by EU law, disputes which may concern the application or interpretation of EU law.»

Indeed, the full court of the ECJ in Opinion 2/15 has already underlined that ISDS rivals with domestic courts and is not part of the domestic judicial system, when it held that ISDS «removes disputes from the jurisdiction of the courts of the Member States» (para. 292).

agree to remove from the jurisdiction of their own courts, and hence from the system of judicial remedies which the second subparagraph of Article 19 (1) TEU requires them to establish in the fields covered by EU law (see, to that effect, judgment of 27 February 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, C ‑ 64 / 16, EU: C: 2018:117, paragraph 34), disputes which may concern the application or interpretation of EU law.

In dealing with the claimant's further request for an order that anyone who had read the privileged documents or was aware of their content should be removed from further involvement in the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputIn dealing with the claimant's further request for an order that anyone who had read the privileged documents or was aware of their content should be removed from further involvement in the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin the relevant FSA investigation, the judge held that, while the approach identified in the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin the private law context to the question whether a lawyer in possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin possession of privileged material should be restrained from acting is a useful guide, when the question arises in judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin judicial review proceedings there will necessarily be a public law element in the underlying disputin the underlying dispute.

«The panel finds that Justice Matlow participated in controversial political discussions, inappropriately used the privileged platform of judicial office, publicly offered legal advice and criticism, took a role in litigation that was likely to come before his court, communicated with the press in the course of advancing a specific point of view in a legal and political dispute against a party that was imminently to appear before him in litigation, and failed to ensure that his actions and the extent of his involvement in the dispute with that party were disclosed to his co-panelists [on Divisional Court] and to the parties,» said the panel.

We can advise and represent you or your business in connection with domain name disputes, including claims against cyber squatters, sometimes resolved on the basis of residency requirements and / or through complaints to internet registrars, but other times requiring judicial assistance.