First recipient of the Judge Scott J. Silverman Award
in Judicial History and Preservation, Eleventh Judicial Circuit Historical Society, 2007
Not exact matches
While use of these RFRA laws has been part and parcel of the
judicial landscape since the 1990s, the controversy over them is part of a long
history of discrimination
in the U.S. And the attempts to end that discrimination stretch all the way back to the Civil War.
The
History of Courts and Procedure
in Medieval Canon Law edited by wilfried hartmann and kenneth pennington catholic university of america, 512 pages, $ 75 In this lively and detailed collection of articles concerning the development of judicial practice during the Middle Ages, the reader is..
in Medieval Canon Law edited by wilfried hartmann and kenneth pennington catholic university of america, 512 pages, $ 75
In this lively and detailed collection of articles concerning the development of judicial practice during the Middle Ages, the reader is..
In this lively and detailed collection of articles concerning the development of
judicial practice during the Middle Ages, the reader is....
Both sides will benefit, Democrats would get Downstate (which
in my humble opinion should be called the Commonwealth of New Amsterdam after the most progressive city
in Europe and
in reference to the city's
history), a guaranteed two seats
in the US Senate (+1 because Gillibrand did well Upstate
in the last election, so 3 seats for the Democrats), guaranteed control of the
Judicial, Legislative, and Executive branches, and the once
in a lifetime opportunity to write a state constitution to their own liking (firearms rights applies only to military and police, right to choose for women, protections for LGBT New Yorkers, etc)
And
judicial activism has been applied by both parties at different points
in US
history.
Concerning the
history of the separation of powers
in Australia, I am aware that the High Court has taken a narrow view of what tribunals can exercise
judicial power.
Judge Alan Simon, who presided over the Spring Valley Village Court and the Ramapo Town Court
in Rockland County, was found by a
judicial oversight commission to have a
history of bullying and verbally abusing court staffers, and has been suspended with pay pending a review of the allegations against him.
In a case with a long
history, Julie Hancock & Others v. Commissioner of Education & Others, the commonwealth's Supreme
Judicial Court firmly rejected claims that the education funding system violated the state's constitution.
History has shown that rigorous environmental protections are most likely to be instituted and enforced
in open societies where an independent
judicial branch, media, activists and public can freely challenge government and business interests.
The Supreme
Judicial Court reviewed the legislative
history of each statute and concluded that the two - year statute of limitations period of G.L. c. 161A, § 38, governs all personal injury claims against the MBTA, including those involving a defect
in a public way.
This book is a fascinating
history of the
judicial opinion
in the United States from its origins
in English tradition and the founding of the United States
judicial system to the United States Supreme Court's and state courts» institutional
judicial styles starting
in the nineteenth century and moving on to current institutional and individual styles.
Beyond its seminal
history, today's Superior Court of Justice
in Ontario holds a place of major importance
in the Canadian
judicial system.
When sentencing an Aboriginal offender, courts must consider: (1) The unique systemic or background factors which may have played a part
in bringing the particular aboriginal offender before the courts.To do this courts are to take
judicial notice of such matters as the
history of colonialism, displacement, and residential schools and how that
history continues to translate into lower educational attainment, lower incomes, higher unemployment, higher rates of substance abuse and suicide, and higher levels of incarceration for Aboriginal peoples.
One does not have to go too far back
in history to read
judicial decisions which are oral transcriptions by «outsourced» reporters.
The recent
history of
judicial review
in Canada has been marked by ebbs and flows of deference, confounding tests and new words for old problems, but no solutions that provide real guidance for litigants, counsel, administrative decision makers or
judicial review judges.
Did you check
judicial history in more than one source?
The notice alleges Douglas «knowingly participated»
in the sexual harassment of Chapman; that she failed to disclose anything about the situation
in a personal
history form related to an application for
judicial appointment; that she is incapable as a judge because the nude photos question «the image and concept of integrity of the judiciary»; and that she did not fully disclose facts to independent counsel by modifying a personal diary entry that was relevant to the investigation.
The Court found no support
in the legislative
history of any intent to broaden
judicial review of arbitral awards or to permit the Court to vacate an award on «any reasonable basis.»
In his dissenting opinion joined by Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Clarence Thomas expressed doubt that «Congress intended administrative preclusion to apply to TTAB findings of fact in a subsequent trademark infringement suit,» based on the history of administrative preclusion and both the express language and «several features» of the Lanham Act, including that the Act confers limited authority on the TTAB and provides for judicial review of the Board's decision
In his dissenting opinion joined by Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Clarence Thomas expressed doubt that «Congress intended administrative preclusion to apply to TTAB findings of fact
in a subsequent trademark infringement suit,» based on the history of administrative preclusion and both the express language and «several features» of the Lanham Act, including that the Act confers limited authority on the TTAB and provides for judicial review of the Board's decision
in a subsequent trademark infringement suit,» based on the
history of administrative preclusion and both the express language and «several features» of the Lanham Act, including that the Act confers limited authority on the TTAB and provides for
judicial review of the Board's decisions.
Not only did the Court find no legislative
history to support an argument that the D.C. Council intended to expand or to deviate from the existing and limited standard of review, but the Court,
in reviewing the drafting
history of the Revised Uniform Arbitration Act, found likewise — that there was never any intent to abandon the standard of narrow and extremely limited
judicial review of an arbitration award.
He considers it from the perspective of the public, the bar and the bench, provides a brief
history of
judicial involvement
in settlement discussions, adumbrates the arguments for and against
judicial mediation, and asks whether it is a reality or a fantasy.
The scrapping of employment tribunal fees has been described as the «most significant
judicial intervention
in the
history of British employment law» — a statement I would agree with; it's going to make a huge difference and employers need to be prepared.
Defended probate court judge
in judicial impeachment proceedings and before the Connecticut Supreme Court
in the only impeachment to occur
in the
history of the Connecticut House of Representatives.
The
history of the
judicial interpretation of s. 7 of the Charter, which was engaged
in this case, illustrates the difficulty courts face when engaged
in adjudication of inherently moral and ethical issues, requiring policy - based determinations.
In the early 80's, the Canadian Law Information Council (CLIC) noted that the «style of cause» was an important tool to locate decisions and track judicial history in law reports, and that the lack of consistency among those prepared by different publishers was therefore a significant hindrance to the reliability of legal research (see Lounder, Case law reporting in Canada, 1982 and Helleiner, Standards for headnoting: case identification, CLIC, 1984
In the early 80's, the Canadian Law Information Council (CLIC) noted that the «style of cause» was an important tool to locate decisions and track
judicial history in law reports, and that the lack of consistency among those prepared by different publishers was therefore a significant hindrance to the reliability of legal research (see Lounder, Case law reporting in Canada, 1982 and Helleiner, Standards for headnoting: case identification, CLIC, 1984
in law reports, and that the lack of consistency among those prepared by different publishers was therefore a significant hindrance to the reliability of legal research (see Lounder, Case law reporting
in Canada, 1982 and Helleiner, Standards for headnoting: case identification, CLIC, 1984
in Canada, 1982 and Helleiner, Standards for headnoting: case identification, CLIC, 1984).
In another employment law dispute over unpaid overtime and meal benefits that had beaten a complex path through the
judicial system, the judge described the nature of the procedural
history as «similar to a Star Wars bar scene, the procedural
history of this action is bizarre.»
My brief review of Mr. Schmidt's case has all the makings of
Judicial History where allegedly breaking the rules and the law, «
in the public interest», may not favour absolute immunity for the AG.
Whether the prybar used is a dictionary, a
history book, or
judicial thumbs, the point remains: according to Scalia, meaning inheres
in words.
Erecting a monument to communism
in the
Judicial Precinct is also problematic from the perspective of Canadian legal
history.
Through numerous pre-trial and
judicial pre-trials, Joseph Neuberger established a
history of misleading evidence proffered by the complainant as against M.M.
in his own effort to remove M.M. from control of the family business.
She has been the only black woman to serve
in that capacity
in the 100 - year
history of the 11th
Judicial Circuit.
It was the first «lifelong» blocking of sites
in the
history of the Russian
judicial practice.
In his extensive post on Jottings by an Employer's Lawyer, Fox recommends reading the Court's 36 - page opinion, which «thoroughly... reviews the history of legislation designed to protect the employment rights of those serving in the uniformed services, along with its judicial constructio
In his extensive post on Jottings by an Employer's Lawyer, Fox recommends reading the Court's 36 - page opinion, which «thoroughly... reviews the
history of legislation designed to protect the employment rights of those serving
in the uniformed services, along with its judicial constructio
in the uniformed services, along with its
judicial construction.
Update on mandatory
judicial retirement legislation: bills
in 16 states, but so far no enactments; Hawaii appears to be closest but has choppy
history on the subject
Continue reading Update on mandatory
judicial retirement legislation: bills
in 16 states, but so far no enactments; Hawaii appears to be closest but has choppy
history on the subject
White was first nominated
in 1997, but her nomination languished for more than four years — the longest for any
judicial candidate
in Senate
history.
(Sources: Interviews of Brian W. Lennox for OCJ
History Project, 2014 - 15; Interviews of S. Linden for OCJ
History Project, 2014 - 15; David Wake and Brian W. Lennox, «The Ontario Court of Justice: A Journey
in Education,» National
Judicial Institute: 20th Anniversary Essays, p. 41)
Given the long
history of courts — including the Ontario Court of Justice —
judicial education is still
in its infancy.
This collection serves as a valuable visual record of the
history of the top levels of the
judicial and legal professions
in Ontario.
[65] The
history of
judicial education
in the Ontario Court of Justice mirrors what was happening
in broader society.
Another influential book
in the
history of
judicial education was Professor Martin Friedland's 1965 analysis of the bail process, «Detention before Trial.»
Professor Jed Shugerman's
history of
judicial elections, «The People's Courts,» discussed how a few Southern states moved from
judicial elections to merit selection
in response to black voters regaining some power from 1950 to the early 1970s.
[8] I have discussed this issue
in more detail
in Peter A. Gall, «Problems with a Faith Based Approach to
Judicial Review»
in Judicial Deference to Administrative Tribunals
in Canada: Its
History and Future (Markham, ON: LexisNexis, 2014)[Gall, «Faith Based»] at 219 - 223.
The most important event
in the
history of the West Virginia judiciary occurred on November 5, 1974, when the voters ratified the
Judicial Reorganization Amendment, which became effective on January 1, 1976.
In telling students this, I think I inevitably left the (mistaken) impression, by inference, that one did not need to worry about noting up Supreme Court of Canada cases after 1949 for judicial history (i.e., to see if the case was reversed on appeal)(but I am consistent in telling students that one should always noteup all Supreme Court of Canada decisions from any period of time for judicial and academic commentary and to find «like» cases, which would have, in the situation that follows, have caught the mistake in any event
In telling students this, I think I inevitably left the (mistaken) impression, by inference, that one did not need to worry about noting up Supreme Court of Canada cases after 1949 for
judicial history (i.e., to see if the case was reversed on appeal)(but I am consistent
in telling students that one should always noteup all Supreme Court of Canada decisions from any period of time for judicial and academic commentary and to find «like» cases, which would have, in the situation that follows, have caught the mistake in any event
in telling students that one should always noteup all Supreme Court of Canada decisions from any period of time for
judicial and academic commentary and to find «like» cases, which would have,
in the situation that follows, have caught the mistake in any event
in the situation that follows, have caught the mistake
in any event
in any event).
Amar Khoday, «' Homicide Is Foreign To Our Experience of Political Conflict»: Interrogating
Judicial Constructions of the
History of Political Violence
in Refugee and Extradition Cases.»
To the extent called to the attention of an expert witness upon cross-examination or relied upon by the expert witness
in direct examination, statements contained
in published treatises, periodicals, or pamphlets on a subject of
history, medicine, or other science or art, established a reliable authority by the testimony or admission of the witness or by other expert testimony or by
judicial notice.
The North American Chamber of Commerce immediately blasted the decision, calling it the «most blatant example of
judicial activism
in the
history of the United States Supreme Court.»
The California Supreme Court Historical Society Founded
in 1989, the California Supreme Court Historical Society is dedicated to recovering, preserving, and promoting California's legal and
judicial history, with a particular emphasis on the state's highest court.
If there is not much
judicial consideration of the current version of the legislation, then you must trace the legislative
history of the section back and find references to the provision
in earlier revisions of the legislation.