Sentences with phrase «in judicial procedure»

Not exact matches

In the Old Testament not cruelty but well - considered judicial procedure, based on blood - brotherhood, was responsible for the wholesale destruction of a family in punishment for the sin of a single member of it, as in the case of AchaIn the Old Testament not cruelty but well - considered judicial procedure, based on blood - brotherhood, was responsible for the wholesale destruction of a family in punishment for the sin of a single member of it, as in the case of Achain punishment for the sin of a single member of it, as in the case of Achain the case of Achan.

According to NBCW, the pope's emphasis on mercy in the document, «The Gentle Judge, our Lord Jesus, the Shepherd of Souls», is central to the new procedures which help reduce the time taken to process a case, and assist diocesan bishops to use their judicial power for the good of those in their care.

It did not become a divisive issue until the 1970s when the church's legislative and judicial procedures produced a regulation that prohibited the ordination of a man who would not participate in the ordination of a woman.

For instance, my own denomination's commitment to «justice» is grounded in Western democracy's assertion of personal and group rights that must be guaranteed by legislative and judicial procedures.

True, there are stated procedures to discipline an erring judge; and in fairness, the National Judicial Council (NJC) has latterly gone on the offensive to discipline some of such judges.

There is already general agreement that the circumstances in which the police will need to go beyond even 14 days will be rare and will be subject to special procedures, both of judicial oversight and of parliamentary accountability.

Pearce earned his B.S. in Management at the University of Phoenix in 1981 and earned four certificates from the following institutions: Arizona State University (Advanced Executive Development), the University of Colorado, Boudler (Motor Vehicle Legal and Law College), Arizona Judicial College (Court Rules & Procedures for New Judges) and Harvard University (Government).

In Canada, there are two different procedures that dictate the way foreclosures are processed: Power of Sale and Judicial Sale.

The AVMA Judicial Council can take action up to, and including, dismissal from the AVMA in accordance with the AVMA's Rules of Disciplinary Procedures...

Public participation (described as access to information and judicial remedy, as well as participation in decision making) in development projects not only has legal precedent in international accords but also has been incorporated into the procedures of international lending organizations.

The lesson of all three cases is that the courts do not accept that the funding of litigation is a matter for Parliament alone and the judicial review procedure will usually be the mechanism for challenging government decisions in this field, although Coventry is not a judicial review case.

However, in the absence of a system to preventively suspend the application of national laws during unconstitutionality procedures, judicial fees must be paid at the higher rate until the Constitutional Court decides the issue.

Following the Magna Carta, there gradually developed a «connotation that at least a minimal degree of legal procedures — those that insure a fair hearing, especially the opportunity to be heard before a neutral decision - maker — must be accorded in the context of the judicial process.»

Hazard was an expert in civil procedure, judicial administration and legal ethics, according to an...

While the goals of LA&W are similar to those of legal writing classes taught at many schools — to teach students to understand, analyze, and apply legal authority and to communicate the results of that analysis in writing — the course also contains some components that are influenced by its Legal Methods roots, as well as some that may or may not be taught in a first - semester civil procedure class: a focus on judicial methods, an introduction to legal institutions and processes, and instruction on the anatomy of a civil law suit, the timeline of a civil case, and the link between procedural and substantive law.30 The full set of course goals was outlined in the 2000 Report and has remained unchanged:

The 1910 amendment, by its terms, did not eliminate those substantive standards but altered the procedures of judicial review:» [N] 0 fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of this state, unless the court can affirmatively say there is no evidence to support the verdict» (emphasis added).

Citing the Canadian Judicial Council's «Statement of Principles on Self - Represented Litigants and Accused Persons», the Court went on to make a ruling that included an explanation of law and in particular procedure and limitations.

Indeed, the Canadian Judicial Council's Statement of Principles on Self - Represented Persons and Accused Persons (September 2006)(Statement of Principles) explicitly states that judges should modify procedure for self - represented persons, and in particular:

Because JAMS provides alternative dispute resolution mechanisms that operate in accordance with judicial procedures, we may also deny or limit access to personal data in the following contexts: (i) interference with law enforcement or with private causes of action, including the prevention, investigation or detection of offenses or the right to a fair trial, arbitration or mediation; (ii) disclosure where the legitimate rights or important interests of others would be violated; (iii) breaching a legal or other professional privilege or obligation; (iv) prejudicing employee security investigations or grievance proceedings or in connection with employee succession planning and corporate reorganizations; or (v) prejudicing the confidentiality necessary in monitoring, inspection or regulatory functions connected with sound management, or in future or ongoing negotiations involving JAMS.

To be honest, I had no experience in bringing a Judicial Review prior to taking this on, let alone Supreme Court practice and procedure!

Today is a banner day for sane discussion of the medical procedure known as abortion, thanks to a plethora of articles in Tuesday's newspapers and Web sites that put the issue into legal, social and judicial context.

Although Juniata and Perry Counties are in the same judicial district, share the same judges, and have similar procedures, their courthouses are separate.

This procedure must therefore be open for all questions capable of submission for judicial consideration, either by the court of justice or possible by national courts, in so far as such questions give rise to doubt either as to the substantive or formal validity of the agreement with regard to the treaty.

The future Earlier this year, Jack Straw announced the publication of a draft Constitutional Renewal Bill, which laid out a series of proposals including clarifying the role of the attorney general in respect of managing prosecutions, abolishing nolle prosequi, and reforming both judicial appointments procedure and the civil service.

(Sources: Mary Jane Hatton and Joseph James, Case Management in the Family Court: A Guide to Implementation, Office of the Chief Judge, Ontario Court (Provincial Division), May 1995; Patrick LeSage and Michael Code, Report of the Review of Large and Complex Criminal Case Procedures, «Judicial Case Management, Especially at the Pre-trial Stage,» November 2008; Margot Gibb - Clark, «Where judgment is swift,» The Globe and Mail, February 28, 1995, p. B16.)

«Judicial hellholes» generally are defined as «places where judges systematically apply laws and court procedures in an unfair and unbalanced manner, generally against defendants in civil lawsuits.»

Any order of the Oklahoma Supreme Court modifying or repealing any provision of the Code of Judicial Conduct as it exists on the effective date of this act, or enacting a revision to the Code of Judicial Conduct as it exists on the effective date of this act, shall be submitted to the Legislature for its review as and in the manner that agency rules are submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act.

In the Redknapp case, although production orders under s 345 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and special procedure search warrants under PACE 1984, s 9 had previously been granted by a Crown Court judge, it was a warrant under PACE 1984, s 8 that brought about the judicial review.

In the U.K., the Office for Judicial Complaints, established in 2006 after a reform of the judicial complaint procedure, reports that five judges have been removed in the last three years, as well as a further eight resignations by judges under investigatioIn the U.K., the Office for Judicial Complaints, established in 2006 after a reform of the judicial complaint procedure, reports that five judges have been removed in the last three years, as well as a further eight resignations by judges under investJudicial Complaints, established in 2006 after a reform of the judicial complaint procedure, reports that five judges have been removed in the last three years, as well as a further eight resignations by judges under investigatioin 2006 after a reform of the judicial complaint procedure, reports that five judges have been removed in the last three years, as well as a further eight resignations by judges under investjudicial complaint procedure, reports that five judges have been removed in the last three years, as well as a further eight resignations by judges under investigatioin the last three years, as well as a further eight resignations by judges under investigation.

These provisions grant the EU competence to enact minimum rules in respect of the rights of individuals involved in criminal procedures, to the extent necessary to facilitate mutual recognition and judicial cooperation in this field.

The difficulties caused to AE by not disclosing the closed material were in the words of the Strasbourg court «sufficiently counterbalanced by the procedures followed by the judicial authorities» and that was the way in which the special advocate procedure had worked in the instant case.

It is too early to know what action should flow from the evidence, but it is anticipated that this may include an array of reforms affecting formal court procedures, frontline legal service entry and information points, changes in legal and judicial culture, alternative models of legal practice, multi-sector perspectives on investment in access to justice, and effective public involvement in the change process.

The Sixth Judicial Circuit (Pasco and Pinellas Counties) recently released Administrative Order 2011 - 006 PA / PI - CIR which sets out the following procedures for mediation in family law matters:

«Judicial Hellholes are places where judges systematically apply laws and court procedures in an unfair and unbalanced manner, generally against defendants, in civil lawsuits.»

Following several years of judicial procedures, the Austrian Supreme Court made a preliminary reference to the European Court of Justice on two issues, of which the most interesting one concerns whether the environmental impact assessment also serves to protect an individual against pecuniary damages as a result of the decrease in the value of his or her property.

Article 267 TFEU is a formal, institutionalised judicial dialogue procedure that ensures the uniform interpretation and enforcement of EU law via national courts in all 28 Member States.

At my law school, in addition to the common first year subjects — torts, property, contracts, criminal law, legal systems and judicial process and legal writing — we were required to take administrative law, evidence, civil procedure, insurance, constitutional law (division of powers, that is — the Charter was not yet... [more]

A foreclosure sale under a Deed of Trust does not have to follow the same procedures as a judicial foreclosure, which requires stricter parameters and a higher level of accountability; no judicial supervision is required for a foreclosure sale under a Deed of Trust in most states.

The court decided to review Issues 2, 3, 5 and 6 on a «deferential standard of reasonableness,» but applied correctness to Issues 1 and 4: «While I acknowledge that in the administrative law context a tribunal may develop its own procedures as to admissibility without the recognized strictures found in the judicial rules of evidence, whereas issues # 1 and # 4 principally involve specific questions of law and concurrent issues involving breaches of natural justice or procedural fairness, I will apply a standard of correctness.

The Criminal Procedure Code and Law No. 302/2004 on international judicial co-operation in criminal matters regulates Romania's co-operation procedures on extradition, European arrest warrants, the transfer of criminal proceedings and sentenced persons, and the recognition and execution of judgments.

The majority differs from the dissenting view principally on the basis of the weight attached to legislative intention; it is no accident, say Kay and Pitchford LJJ, that the grant of draconian powers deemed to be necessary to combat terrorism is couched in a procedure where judicial supervision is limited.

Furthermore, although it is true that the procedure laid down in Article 267 TFEU is an instrument for cooperation between the Court of Justice and the national courts, by means of which the former provides the latter with the points of interpretation of EU law necessary in order for them to decide the disputes before them, the fact remains that when there is no judicial remedy under national law against the decision of a court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal is, in principle, obliged to bring the matter before the Court of Justice under the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU where a question relating to the interpretation of EU law is raised before it...

Chief among these is the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant, which requires judicial and police authorities to bypass all national extradition procedures involving suspects residing in a EU member state.

It is not appropriate for a single judge of the court below to engage in matters of practice and procedure in what I call judicial individualism.

Courts and attorneys continue to search for tools and procedures that will address the challenges with an ever increasing self - represented population in the judicial system.

The Arizona Court of Appeals did accept jurisdiction, however, to clarify that some of the procedures followed by the court, in this case, were contrary to the statutes in place for the purpose of preventing any court in the future from delegating judicial decisions to expert witnesses or allowing interim transfers of custody without a hearing.

It initially addressed Article 34 SCA, emphasizing that the procedure established a «special means of judicial cooperation» between the Court and national courts (para 53), which was «completely independent» of any initiative by the parties in the case, although of course in practice often an application to submit a question to the EFTA Court will be made by a party to a dispute (para 55).

[2] A «Resolución» (Decision) is an informative note by a judge, not resolving a specific case in particular, but rather telling citizens that his Court will not declare inadmissible any procedures for not paying the new judicial fees.

However, one may question whether the EFTA Court is not going very far here in reviewing the appropriateness of domestic judicial decisions in a field where EEA law expressly gives discretion to EEA EFTA States — in deliberate contrast to the constraints imposed on EU Member States under the preliminary reference procedure.

In the literature, scholars have thus concluded that the setting of judicial remedies in the EEA is incomplete for the EFTA countries, as there is no binding preliminary reference procedure which would ensure one unitary authoritative interpretation of EEA law (see S. Magnússon, «On the Authority of Advisory Opinions», 13 Europarättslig tidskrift (2010) p. 528 at p. 535 - 536In the literature, scholars have thus concluded that the setting of judicial remedies in the EEA is incomplete for the EFTA countries, as there is no binding preliminary reference procedure which would ensure one unitary authoritative interpretation of EEA law (see S. Magnússon, «On the Authority of Advisory Opinions», 13 Europarättslig tidskrift (2010) p. 528 at p. 535 - 536in the EEA is incomplete for the EFTA countries, as there is no binding preliminary reference procedure which would ensure one unitary authoritative interpretation of EEA law (see S. Magnússon, «On the Authority of Advisory Opinions», 13 Europarättslig tidskrift (2010) p. 528 at p. 535 - 536).