Sentences with phrase «in judicial reviews of decisions»

On issues such as the content of the record on judicial review applications, the extent to which administrative decision - makers can participate in judicial reviews of their decisions, superior court review of federal prison decisions and tribunals» capacity to reconsider their decisions, Canadian courts have recently come under pressure to update the procedural law to bring it into line with the substantive law.
Members of 5RB are also involved in judicial reviews of decisions of the Press Complaints Commission and the other media regulators.
Our lawyers have acted for architects, engineers, lawyers, dentists, and accountants in professional errors and omissions claims, advised clients before professional regulatory bodies, acted for professional administrative bodies, provided advice regarding investigations conducted by administrative authorities, and have acted in judicial reviews of decisions made by professional regulatory bodies.
Acting in a judicial review of a decision of an Independent Reviewer (appointed under section 166 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000) to the effect that the redress offered to a client in respect of a mis - sold financial...
R (On the application of Catt) v. Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2008] EWHC 1042 (Court of Appeal), junior counsel in intervention on behalf of Liberty in judicial review of decision to retain information on national extremism database in reliance on Article 8, ECHR.
Daphne Romney QC: instructed in a judicial review of a decision by the National College for Teaching and Leadership (NCTL) to bar a headteacher for misuse of public funds; also representing a pharmacist at an eight - day hearing before the General Pharmaceutical Council late 2015.
Represented a health authority in a judicial review of its decision to relocate an obstetrics ward outside of a small town hospital.

Not exact matches

A judicial review («JR») is a type of court proceeding in which a judge reviews the lawfulness of a decision or action made by a public body; they are a challenge to the way in which a decision has been made, rather than the conclusion reached.
And in the crisis, emergency decisions were made that have been effectively removed from judicial review, including violations of state corporate law and issues raised by the Constitution.
Various judicial review and appeal applications have been launched with respect to both the JRP Report and the decision of the Governor in Council.
JUDGING THE JUDGES Patrick McKinley Brennan's review «The Forms Behind the Laws» (April) begs fundamental questions of interpretation, blurs the distinction between legislating and judging, and proposes a mode of judicial interpretation that would, in its practical application, be indistinguishable from judges who make decisions based on personal preference.
We also oppose provisions of the bill that expand the immigration detention system and erode the basic rights afforded to immigrants, including the provisions that allow for the indefinite detention of individuals who can not be deported to their home countries; that expedite removal proceedings or automatically imprison immigrants without providing them access to attorneys or judges; that increase detention capacity by an additional 20,000 beds to house immigrants awaiting their day in court; and that diminish the checks and balances of judicial review over immigration decisions.
The ACCC had 28 days in which to apply for judicial review of the decision, but such a review would not test the merits of the Tribunal's decision.
An appeal on the merits is not available for Tribunal merger authorisation decisions, but the ACCC is seeking judicial review, alleging three reviewable errors, including that the Tribunal erred in its reasoning that «it could only conclude that the proposed acquisition was likely to result in a detriment if the Tribunal concluded that there would be a substantial lessening of competition».
Last year he singled out planning judicial review by saying cases must be brought within six weeks of any decision rather than the usual three months, knowing it is harder for small community groups to raise money and start complex proceedings in this short space of time.
Perhaps the minister should look at the quality of decision - making in his own department and its agencies before seeking to limit judicial review.
Top of the pops this week was a piece on the Liberal Democrat decision to support the Conservatives in dismantling judicial review.
Plans for two new state - funded Catholic schools with discriminatory admissions policies have cleared a further hurdle today, after Mr Justice Sales in the High Court dismissed a judicial review of Richmond - upon - Thames council's decision to approve them.
An Accra High Court presided by Justice Ackah Boafo has in a judicial review quashed the decision by the lands and natural resources ministry to revoke the mining license of Exton Cubic Group Limited, owned by Ibrahim Mahama.
The DWP decided to appeal against the decision and around the same time the Carmichaels» separate application for a judicial review of the underlying legislation was dismissed in the high court.
A year later members of the U.S. House of Representatives introduced a bill that would strip federal protections from wolves in the Great Lakes region and Wyoming with language preventing any further judicial review — overruling two court decisions finding that the Fish and Wildlife Service had wrongly removed Endangered Species Act protections for the wolf.
Campaign group Comprehensive Future had previously said it was seeking advice on the feasibility of a judicial review of the decision in the High Court, but has delayed plans due to a lack of information.
Margaret Tulloch of Comprehensive Future, a group which campaigns for equality of opportunity in education, confirmed they were taking advice on the feasibility of a judicial review of the decision in the High Court.
The decisions of public bodies, such as the Secretary of State (and therefore of RSCs where they assume the powers of the Secretary of State), local authorities and schools can be challenged by way of judicial review and other appropriate proceedings in the High Court.
The judge said the decision about whether to hold a judicial review should be heard in open court, after privately considering the merits of the application.
Last week, Comprehensive Future, which campaigns for equality of opportunity in education, said the group was taking advice on the feasibility of a judicial review of the Weald of Kent decision in the High Court.
The Department for Education (DfE) has said it disagrees with «some aspects» of the court's decision last month to rule against education secretary Nicky Morgan in a judicial review brought by six parents, but has not said which.
The legality of the government's decision over the Weald of Kent has been called into question by some, including former schools minister David Laws, who said in his diaries that ministers were warned the decision was at serious risk of losing if put to a judicial review.
Given that it currently appears unlikely that the Senate will agree to anything resembling the current cap and trade bill, this EPA decision may well greatly decrease the chances that the US will in the end implement serious regulation of GHGs since EPA regulations under the Clean Air Act must survive judicial review of any regulatons that EPA may promulgate.
Whilst the CAC's decision can not be appealed (though it could be challenged by way of judicial review in the High Court), the legal battle on the «gig economy» riders» status is far from over.
The lesson of all three cases is that the courts do not accept that the funding of litigation is a matter for Parliament alone and the judicial review procedure will usually be the mechanism for challenging government decisions in this field, although Coventry is not a judicial review case.
Finally, he brought yet another judicial review application in Ontario to, in the Court's words, «reconsider the surrender decision made by a previous Minister of Justice and confirmed by another Minister of Justice.»
In R (on the application of the Transport and General Workers Union and another) v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] All ER (D) 85 (Jun) a council decided to press ahead with a decision to award its catering services to an outside contractor, M Ltd, instead of the authority's internal caterers despite the existence of an unresolved judicial review claim.
One is the ability of a decision making body to participate in or commence judicial review proceedings.
We also represent clients in challenging decisions of regulators and policy makers through environmental judicial review.
This is a decision on a judicial review of the Government's decision to introduce the Draft Order (it was lodged earlier in the year).
In addition to these administrative mechanisms, a patient may turn to the courts for judicial review of either the substantive decision (i.e. the decision to cover (or not) a particular medical service) or the process used to make that decision.
restrict the right to an oral hearing in cases where the individual is seeking judicial review of a prior judicial decision, such as the decision of a bench of lay magistrates or the parole board.
We also represent employers before all levels of courts in wrongful dismissal actions, occupational health and safety matters, judicial reviews of decisions made by administrative tribunals and to obtain injunctive relief.
We granted certiorari, 510 U. S. 1068 (1994), to consider whether Oregon's limited judicial review of the size of punitive damages awards is consistent with our decision in Has lip.
Late last year, the Supreme Court of Canada derided «fashionable» claims by applicants for judicial review that a correctness standard should apply in the review of administrative decisions.
[56] Thus, «On judicial review, the question becomes whether, in assessing the impact of the relevant Charter protection and given the nature of the decision and the statutory and factual contexts, the decision reflects a proportionate balancing of the Charter protections at play.»
Working with specialist lawyers across our firm in sectors such as energy and environment, we provide high quality, pragmatic advice on the judicial review of planning decisions.
We advise on judicial review of planning decisions in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.
You may want to consider judicial review if you were a part of a dispute resolution proceeding at the Residential Tenancy Branch (RTB) which did not go in your favour and you believe that the decision made by the arbitrator at the hearing was unreasonable or unfair.
[56] Decisions of the Tribunal are subject to judicial review in the Federal Court of Appeal.
A judicial review is a court action in which a judge reviews the decision of a tribunal or other legal decision - maker for serious errors or unfairness.
All those involved in the wind power industry should take note of this decision, which could eventually be submitted to judicial review.
This was an appeal against a decision of Bean J to reject a judicial review of the Parking Adjudicator's decision in a test case concerning the effect of alleged defects in traffic signs and road markings on the liability to pay the penalty charge (a parking ticket).
Our specialist team of lawyers advises on judicial review of planning decisions, as well as statutory challenges for claimants and defendants in the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z