Sentences with phrase «in less evaporation»

Not exact matches

«You get less evaporation, less moisture in the atmosphere, and less rainfall again.

Less evaporation adds to heat stress in plants, which ultimately affects crop yield.»

The weaker temperature gradient would have meant less rainfall and more evaporation in the midlatitude North Pacific.

Global warming is desiccating the region in two ways: higher temperatures that increase evaporation in already parched soils, and weaker winds that bring less rain from the Mediterranean Sea during the wet season (November to April).

In addition, less ice cover can lead to more evaporation and lower water levels while warmer water contributes to more algal blooms and impaired water quality, she says.

In addition, if there is less water being absorbed in the evaporation process, the sun's energy will just be going into the atmosphere, instead of being absorbed, and that could exacerbate global warminIn addition, if there is less water being absorbed in the evaporation process, the sun's energy will just be going into the atmosphere, instead of being absorbed, and that could exacerbate global warminin the evaporation process, the sun's energy will just be going into the atmosphere, instead of being absorbed, and that could exacerbate global warming.

However, in theory, inhibited sweat evaporation would be less important in cold weather environments, so the negative impact of compression gear may be lessened, while the potential performance and recovery enhancements would remain.

Evaporation by dryer air / more sunshine / less clouds may have played a role in several glaciers.

In a much colder climate, evaporation would be less.

With the decrease in Atlantic trade wind strength there is less evaporation, and if there is less evaporation, sea surface temperatures rise.

Though one could get more clouds in temperate and polar regions if there less clouds in tropics - generating massive amount of evaporation.

These methods have been significantly improved by fully coupling the hydrologic cycle among land, lake, and atmosphere.94, 95 Without accounting for that cycle of interactions, a study96 concluded that increases in precipitation would be negated by increases in winter evaporation from less ice cover and by increases in summer evaporation and evapotranspiration from warmer air temperatures, under a scenario of continued increases in global emissions (SRES A2 scenario).

In Broecker's view, failures of salt flushing cause a worldwide rearrangement of ocean currents, resulting in — and this is the speculative part — less evaporation from the tropicIn Broecker's view, failures of salt flushing cause a worldwide rearrangement of ocean currents, resulting in — and this is the speculative part — less evaporation from the tropicin — and this is the speculative part — less evaporation from the tropics.

Part way there, but no quantitation yet: of the 3.77 W / m ^ 2 radiated back dowwnard, most goes to increased rate of evaporation of the water at the surface, and much less goes to increased mean temp increase at the surface; hence increased rate of non-radiative transfer of heat from surface to upper atmosphere, slight increase in rainfall as hydrological cycle is faster, and slight increase in cloud cover.

Reworded, the reduction in trade wind strength due to the El Niño causes less evaporation, and since there is less evaporation, tropical North Atlantic sea surface temperatures rise.

The lack of» water vapor» is, because: it was more water in Arctic ocean without ice cover as» insulation» - > water absorbed extra coldness and the currents brought extra coldness in North Atlantic = above the ocean is colder = less evaporation - > less water vapor produced - > less moisture going west from central Atlantic.

As for rainfall, in the simplest models, lowered temperatures decrease evaporation of water from the surface into the air; and less water vapor translates to less rain.

Furthermore, less of this energy can be used for evaporation in urban areas, which characteristically exhibit greater precipitation runoff from streets and buildings.

LIA wasn't GLOBAL cooling; but colder in Europe, north America — because Arctic ocean had less ice cover - > was releasing more heat / was accumulating - > radiating + spreading more coldness — currents were taking that extra coldness to Mexican gulf — then to the Mediterranean — because Sahara was increasing creation of dry heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting more ice on arctic also as chain reaction — Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate for the evaporation deficit.

The point is, in a glider pilot's world, the evaporation frequently leads to condensation within a few miles laterally and within a mile or even less vertically.

It's far from a complete picture of the cyclonic processes because one has to take into account that there are changes in energy due to altitude and that the system is open; able to draw in e.g. less - humid air from around the storm, leading to further surface evaporation.

You claim such a justification from the coincidence that the 1 % to 3 % increase in evaporation seen across the models yields a range of climate sensitivities more or less in line with the IPCC range.

which in turn means more evaporation, which in turn creates more clouds trapping the heat allowing less heat to be radiated off into space

The increase in relative humidity is due to warmer surface sea temperatures allowing greater evaporation and warmer polar conditions causing less condensation.

The tired old alarmist argument goes something like this: CO2 levels increase, which in turn increases temperature, which in turn means more evaporation, which in turn creates more clouds trapping the heat allowing less heat to be radiated off into space.

Decreased snowpack has brought less water into reservoirs (such as Lake Oroville, pictured, in Northern California), while increased temperatures have led to greater evaporation of surface water.

Those effects include more rainfall that occurs in heavy downpours, meaning less is absorbed into the earth and more becomes runoff; more rain and less snowfall in the mountains, which means less melting snow to feed rivers in the spring and summer; and higher temperatures causing more evaporation.

At the surface evaporation dominates, and in clouds condensation dominates, and there I would agree the situation is less reversible locally.

to be used for drinking water Less evaporation from the storage reservoir Little loss of land No damage due to dam failure Pollutants such as mosquitoes and snails can not exist in the reservoirs Siltation does not create any problems Less vulnerable / below the ground surface in a shallow soil toward the impervious crystalline sub soil.

Since at current atmospheric pressure the energy required to provoke evaporation at SST (int) is always less than the energy extracted from SST (int) by evaporation in the form of latent heat the net outcome of all the reactions in SST (int) is always cooling.

This causes more wave action which mixes colder water in from deep sea, this will cause less evaporation) 4) Negatively: more % water vapor in the atmosphere 5) Positively: evaporation itself causes more evaporation (difference in pressure causes wind and wind and heat together causes more evaporation)

The main concern and rightly so, is a decrease in global precipitation due to less evaporation due to less sunlight reaching the surface.

Marine air temperatures and lower troposphere temperatures cool in response because the tropical Pacific is releasing less heat than normal through evaporation as a result of the cooler surface waters.