Sentences with phrase «in less food waste»

As a result, consumers said bulk items were less likely than packaged items to be thrown away, which results in less food waste.

Not exact matches

In the case of frozen food we know food waste can be halved compared with fresh foods - less of it is thrown away.

We are living in an enormous fabric of life, where anti-poverty measures may create new pressures caused by excess consumption; where methane emissions increase if we eat more beef or throw food waste in a landfill; where drought leads to forest fires and more carbon; where marginalizing women makes communities less resilient.

Think about investing in systems that can reduce food waste — or look for alternate markets for your «less than perfect» crops.

Tearfund said a third of all food produced globally is not eaten and waste on this scale is «fueling climate change, causing more droughts, floods and less reliable rain, making life harder for the people in poverty across the world that Tearfund works with».

In partnership with Culinary Nutritionist Stefanie Sacks, Figueiredo is petitioning Whole Foods and Walmart to stop massive food waste by agreeing to sell cosmetically «less than perfect» produce.

In their new Frozen Fortune campaign, Iceland Foods want to raise awareness about the benefits of frozen food, particular about the fact that Frozen food is less likely to be wasted than fresh.

I opt for Imperfect Produce's organic box each week in the hopes that I am contributing less to the use of chemicals and pesticides in agricultural use, and getting the rescued vegetables box each week makes me optimistic that I am helping to alleviate food waste in the United States.

The company started in 2015 with the goal of reducing food waste by encouraging consumers to buy the less - than - perfect produce that would typically be discarded.

In addition, by extending the shelf life, their customers will see less food waste.

Daily deliveries led to more accurate ordering, less food waste, and an improvement in quality.

In support of the USDA goal to reduce food waste by 50 percent by 2030, Hidden Valley ® is making it simple for people across the country to join their efforts in taking steps to reduce food waste by encouraging them to post a photo of their less - than - perfect veggies along with #TasteNotWaste to Facebook, Instagram, or TwitteIn support of the USDA goal to reduce food waste by 50 percent by 2030, Hidden Valley ® is making it simple for people across the country to join their efforts in taking steps to reduce food waste by encouraging them to post a photo of their less - than - perfect veggies along with #TasteNotWaste to Facebook, Instagram, or Twittein taking steps to reduce food waste by encouraging them to post a photo of their less - than - perfect veggies along with #TasteNotWaste to Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter.

By making PET tougher, manufacturers and converters experience less packaging breakage in food preparation, distribution and use, which helps reduce waste.

Thus, it is important to reduce over-consumption of livestock products, to use less concentrated feed in livestock production and to avoid food waste.

Today, many consumers are also looking for products that show environmental responsibility through reduced or improved packaging, which means less packaging waste and spoiled foods in our landfills.

In other places like Europe and North America, food waste near the fork affects the less fortunate.

In our analysis, the average site invested less than one percent of food sales, and saw the cost of its food waste decline by over 60 percent.

Employees can now make the most of breaks instead of wasting time searching for meals or visiting the less healthy fast food options in the area.

All the evidence from WRAP and our own Tesco research has shown that streamlining date codes helps customers waste less food and it also reduces waste in our own operations.

The initiative so far has resulted in 79,200 kg less food waste — amounting to 341,000 kg CO2 saved, the equivalent of 473 flights between Stockholm and London.

In fact, by packing eco-friendly lunches, you are more likely to save money, your children are more likely to eat healthier foods, and you are taking care of the earth by producing less waste.

Moreover, culinary training and the proper equipment make labor more efficient and effective resulting in greater productivity and less food waste.

After the switch, food waste declined and children were less likely to become hungry or feel sick later in the day.

They're great for putting in school lunches the next day, but I'd rather see portion sizes reduced which in turn, like you say, would promote better health, as well as less food waste.

In addition, last fall, Syngenta put forward a more global strategy called The Good Growth Plan which makes six commitments to improve resource use efficiency, including finding ways to produce more food with less waste, degradation, and poverty.

In total, the team is looking at 23 different energy behavior areas — from telecommuting and public transit to wasting less food — and projecting these well into the future.

The recommendations, in addition to flying less and wasting 25 percent less food, include: carpooling or telecommuting once a week (75 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) saved by 2020, if adopted by all Americans); maintaining your car or truck, such as keeping tires properly inflated (45 million metric tons of CO2e); cutting the time spent idling in a vehicle in half (40 million metric tons of CO2e); better insulation at home (85 million metric tons of CO2e); programmable thermostats set higher (80 million metric tons of CO2e); reducing electricity demand from appliances that are «off,» so - called phantom demand (70 million metric tons CO2e); using hot water more efficiently, such as washing clothes in colder water (65 million metric tons of CO2e); buying EnergyStar appliances when old ones wear out (55 million metric tons CO2e); replacing incandescent lightbulbs with compact fluorescents (30 million metric tons CO2e); eating chicken instead of beef two days a week (105 million metric tons of CO2e); increased recycling of paper, plastics and metals (105 million metric tons of CO2e); «responsible» consumption, such as buying less bottled water (60 million metric tons CO2e).

This is because if you put more or less material than needed in your body, it will take some and leave the excess, which means you're wasting food, or if you put in less than it needs, it will utilize it perfectly and get the rest from your fat stores.

The more in touch you are with your habits the less likely you are to waste food.

This costs you less money in the long run, keeps food fresh without chemicals, generates less clutter and creates less waste that can end up in landfills, rivers, lakes and oceans.

Adhering to these traditional concepts the US Department of Agriculture has concluded that diets, which reduce calories, will result in effective weight loss independent of the macronutrient composition, which is considered less important, even irrelevant.14 In contrast with these views, the majority of ad - libitum studies demonstrate that subjects who follow a low - carbohydrate diet lose more weight during the first 3 — 6 months compared with those who follow balanced diets.15, 16, 17 One hypothesis is that the use of energy from proteins in VLCKD is an «expensive» process for the body and so can lead to a «waste of calories», and therefore increased weight loss compared with other «less - expensive» diets.13, 18, 19 The average human body requires 60 — 65 g of glucose per day, and during the first phase of a diet very low in carbohydrates this is partially (16 %) obtained from glycerol, with the major part derived via gluconeogenesis from proteins of either dietary or tissue origin.12 The energy cost of gluconeogenesis has been confirmed in several studies7 and it has been calculated at ∼ 400 — 600 Kcal / day (due to both endogenous and food source proteins.18 Despite this, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this intriguing hypothesis; on the contrary, a recent study reported that there were no changes in resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action of ketosiin effective weight loss independent of the macronutrient composition, which is considered less important, even irrelevant.14 In contrast with these views, the majority of ad - libitum studies demonstrate that subjects who follow a low - carbohydrate diet lose more weight during the first 3 — 6 months compared with those who follow balanced diets.15, 16, 17 One hypothesis is that the use of energy from proteins in VLCKD is an «expensive» process for the body and so can lead to a «waste of calories», and therefore increased weight loss compared with other «less - expensive» diets.13, 18, 19 The average human body requires 60 — 65 g of glucose per day, and during the first phase of a diet very low in carbohydrates this is partially (16 %) obtained from glycerol, with the major part derived via gluconeogenesis from proteins of either dietary or tissue origin.12 The energy cost of gluconeogenesis has been confirmed in several studies7 and it has been calculated at ∼ 400 — 600 Kcal / day (due to both endogenous and food source proteins.18 Despite this, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this intriguing hypothesis; on the contrary, a recent study reported that there were no changes in resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action of ketosiIn contrast with these views, the majority of ad - libitum studies demonstrate that subjects who follow a low - carbohydrate diet lose more weight during the first 3 — 6 months compared with those who follow balanced diets.15, 16, 17 One hypothesis is that the use of energy from proteins in VLCKD is an «expensive» process for the body and so can lead to a «waste of calories», and therefore increased weight loss compared with other «less - expensive» diets.13, 18, 19 The average human body requires 60 — 65 g of glucose per day, and during the first phase of a diet very low in carbohydrates this is partially (16 %) obtained from glycerol, with the major part derived via gluconeogenesis from proteins of either dietary or tissue origin.12 The energy cost of gluconeogenesis has been confirmed in several studies7 and it has been calculated at ∼ 400 — 600 Kcal / day (due to both endogenous and food source proteins.18 Despite this, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this intriguing hypothesis; on the contrary, a recent study reported that there were no changes in resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action of ketosiin VLCKD is an «expensive» process for the body and so can lead to a «waste of calories», and therefore increased weight loss compared with other «less - expensive» diets.13, 18, 19 The average human body requires 60 — 65 g of glucose per day, and during the first phase of a diet very low in carbohydrates this is partially (16 %) obtained from glycerol, with the major part derived via gluconeogenesis from proteins of either dietary or tissue origin.12 The energy cost of gluconeogenesis has been confirmed in several studies7 and it has been calculated at ∼ 400 — 600 Kcal / day (due to both endogenous and food source proteins.18 Despite this, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this intriguing hypothesis; on the contrary, a recent study reported that there were no changes in resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action of ketosiin carbohydrates this is partially (16 %) obtained from glycerol, with the major part derived via gluconeogenesis from proteins of either dietary or tissue origin.12 The energy cost of gluconeogenesis has been confirmed in several studies7 and it has been calculated at ∼ 400 — 600 Kcal / day (due to both endogenous and food source proteins.18 Despite this, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this intriguing hypothesis; on the contrary, a recent study reported that there were no changes in resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action of ketosiin several studies7 and it has been calculated at ∼ 400 — 600 Kcal / day (due to both endogenous and food source proteins.18 Despite this, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this intriguing hypothesis; on the contrary, a recent study reported that there were no changes in resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action of ketosiin resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action of ketosis.

On the other end, it is more efficient in getting juice out of your fruits and vegetables so less food goes to waste.

(Or crafty children may just take the food and pitch it in a less electronically monitored waste can.)

You'll feel more in control of the financials, you'll have less admin time spent on school meals and your school will be more efficient, with less food and fuel going to waste.

Need a kick in the butt to waste less food?

Dogs that eat less fillers in their foods go to the bathroom much less by amount, translating into less waste and less time spent picking up waste.

It is just full of great stuff, does help in the digestibility of even the very best dry commercial foods, making for healthier dogs and less * waste *!

Young Again Ferret Food is digested so completely, you'll see less waste in the litter box so you save on litter costs and

Acana features human - grade ingredients, we don't recommend anything less, so you aren't going to find any of the questionably sourced rendered meats or waste and by - products of the human food industry that are so common in commercial cat foods today.

A diet that has fewer processed foods in it will usually be better absorbed by your dog's body and will result in less output waste.

Your pup will be healthier and you'll have less waste to clean up in the yard if you feed your dog food that he not only digests but processes efficiently.

The right balance of highly digestible nutrition in the formula means less food wasted and more nutrients available to your dog to support and maintain healthy skin and coat condition, strong bones and joints, and a healthy immune system.

If the food is made with lower quality ingredients such as by - products, grain fractions, and chemical preservatives, it will be less digestible and therefore excreted as waste in the form of higher stool volume and excess gas.

You'll also find much less waste in the litter box since your cats are actually digesting and using most of the food, instead of passing through all the waste in cheaper, low - quality food.

Because the ingredients are more easily digested and utilized by the cat's body, canned foods produce less solid waste in the litterbox.

Modern packaging allows your food to stay fresher for longer - not just on shelves in the supermarket but in your home as well.See how packaging helps waste less food.

If we cut food waste in half and ate less protein - intensive foods and more cereals, vegetables, and fruits, we could reduce humanity's Ecological Footprint 16 % and #movethedate of Overshoot Day back 42 days.

Mohareb says diet choices (such as eating less red meat) and reducing food waste are two big ways people in cities can cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Cutting food waste in half worldwide could move the date of Overshoot Day 11 days; eating less protein - intensive food worldwide could move Overshoot Day 31 days.

Commercial SSO waste streams are likely to contain a high proportion of soiled paper waste compared to food waste; however, on a weight basis it would be expected that the fraction of food waste is higher due to the fact that food waste is very high in moisture, whereas paper material would be much less dense with a lower moisture content.