Jim's First Amendment and media experience is exemplified by his successful defense of The New Yorker Magazine
in the libel trial Masson v. New Yorker, 832 F. Supp.
A number of well - known figures have offered statements in defence of Andrew Mitchell
in a libel trial over the «plebgate» row, with Lord Coe calling the former minister «a man of integrity».
[163] In 1996, he warned of the growing influence of spin doctors in the party, and called for Blair to sack Alastair Campbell after a High Court judge criticised
him in a libel trial.
Not exact matches
The author, who served as a member of the British Parliament and once ran for mayor of London, was convicted
in 2001 of committing perjury during a 1987
libel trial.
Written by David Hare and based on the book «History on
Trial: My Day
in Court with a Holocaust Denier» by Professor Deborah Lipstadt of Emory University
in Atlanta, Mick Jackson's Denial is an examination of Professor Lipstadt's (Rachel Weisz, «The Light Between Oceans») court battle
in London to defend herself from a
libel charge brought by British historian David Irving (Timothy Spall, «Mr. Turner»), a Holocaust denier and alleged anti-Semite.
Based on the acclaimed book «History on
Trial: My Day
in Court with a Holocaust Denier,» DENIAL recounts Deborah E. Lipstadt's (Academy Award ® winner Rachel Weisz) legal battle for historical truth against David Irving (Cannes Award winner Timothy Spall), who accused her of
libel when she declared him a Holocaust denier.
In 2000, a libel trial took place in Great Britai
In 2000, a
libel trial took place
in Great Britai
in Great Britain.
The court will hear arguments tomorrow
in a case where a Toronto doctor is appealing a Superior Court decision that dismissed his
libel action against a former head of the Ontario
Trial Lawyers Association and ordered him to pay more than $ 310,000
in costs.
Litigators can also expect more co-operation between parties, which «had all but disappeared post - Mitchell [the Andrew Mitchell
libel trial in which Mitchell's lawyers were sanctioned for not meeting court deadlines]».
To his client's relief, online trade
libel attorney Dan Warner convinced an Arizona appeals court to vacate a
trial court's ruling
in a Facebook defamation case.
Because so few
libel cases ever go to
trial, opportunities to argue for the responsible journalism defence
in court were rare.
I concur
in the reversal, but dissent from leaving the case open for a new
trial, believing that, for reasons stated
in the concurring opinions of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and myself
in the New York Times and Garrison cases, a
libel judgment against Rosenblatt is forbidden by the First Amendment, which the Fourteenth made applicable to the States.
On my proposed disposition of these appeals, the issue whether the claim for
libel in the internet version of the article is subject to the notice and limitation provisions of the Act is relevant only to the issue of discoverability, an issue I would also leave to be determined at
trial.
One of the first cases was
in the
trial of John Peter Zenger,
in 1735, where a law against
libels was used against him, and subsequently nullified by a jury.
In fashioning his damages awards, the trial judge appreciated that, for this reason, a comparison with awards in other libel cases was of little assistanc
In fashioning his damages awards, the
trial judge appreciated that, for this reason, a comparison with awards
in other libel cases was of little assistanc
in other
libel cases was of little assistance.
Although Rabinowitz relies on several
libel cases
in which the amount of the compensatory damages awarded was lower than that awarded here, other
libel cases reveal compensatory damages awards
in amounts higher than those awarded by this
trial judge.
In 1987 I played a peripheral part in what the trial judge, Mr Justice Caulfield, described as «the libel case of the century»: Jeffrey Archer against the Daily Sta
In 1987 I played a peripheral part
in what the trial judge, Mr Justice Caulfield, described as «the libel case of the century»: Jeffrey Archer against the Daily Sta
in what the
trial judge, Mr Justice Caulfield, described as «the
libel case of the century»: Jeffrey Archer against the Daily Star.
Automobile manufacturing innovator Henry Ford illustrated this point during a civil
trial in which he sued a Chicago newspaper for
libel.