My colleague John Cooper reported recently on our firm's Virginia personal injury attorneys» website that electronic health records can assist plaintiffs
in medical malpractice actions against health care providers.
$ 7.5 Million settlement
in medical malpractice action against New York hospital involving brain damage sustained by 7 year old child after surgery
Not exact matches
HAHF argues that «the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty and the Endangered Species Act negatively implicate TVNR and creates the possibilitity [sic] of legal
action against veterinarians engaging
in TVNR,» and that «the primary veterinarian
medical malpractice carrier will not provide insurance coverage for illegal activies [sic].»
The concept of
medical malpractice broadly refers to the tort of negligence being pursued
against a regulated health practitioner for
actions carried on
in the scope of one's
medical practice.
It's also worth noting that Texas law may have limits on the amount of recovery you may be entitled to
in a personal injury claim depending on several factors, including limits established by the Texas Tort Claims Act for
actions against governmental entities, punitive damage awards and general damages awards on
Medical Malpractice claims, just to name a few.
A: One obstacle plaintiffs
in many states may have to overcome before they can even file a
medical malpractice action against a health care professional is the requirement that they file what is commonly known as a «certificate of merit.»
However, one of the aspects of the peer review process, per section 8 of that statute, is that the investigations, proceedings and records of the peer review panel, a committee of a hospital board, disciplinary board, government board or agent of one of these «shall not be subject to discovery or introduction into evidence
in any civil or administrative action against a provider of professional health services arising out of the matters which are the subject of evaluation and review...» In other words, if you file a medical malpractice lawsuit against a Florida doctor, the records contained in these peer review files — even if relevant — can't be compelle
in any civil or administrative
action against a provider of professional health services arising out of the matters which are the subject of evaluation and review...»
In other words, if you file a medical malpractice lawsuit against a Florida doctor, the records contained in these peer review files — even if relevant — can't be compelle
In other words, if you file a
medical malpractice lawsuit
against a Florida doctor, the records contained
in these peer review files — even if relevant — can't be compelle
in these peer review files — even if relevant — can't be compelled.
Pursuing legal
action against negligence with a Topeka
medical malpractice attorney from our firm is
in your best interests if you seek compensation for your injuries.
In order to bring a
medical malpractice action against a doctor based on misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis, it is necessary to prove the following:
In the first appellate decision interpreting and applying Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1006 (a. 1), Pennsylvania's tort reform measure involving venue, the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the ruling of the trial court and held that the plaintiff's
medical malpractice action against John's client, a physician, must be transferred out of Philadelphia County.
The New York
Medical Malpractice Law Blog: «The true impact of this case is, of course, that similarly situated victims of inadequate drug warnings will now be able to initiate
actions against the drug maker
in state court.