Furthermore, factors related to parental stress, such as birth year or age of the child, will be addressed
in moderator analyses.
A fifth limitation is that several moderator analyses were based on a rather small number of effect sizes, implying a low statistical power
in the moderator analyses.
One limitation of this study is that sample sizes
in these moderator analyses were relatively small, so the results are particularly in need of replication.
Not exact matches
Mats Nilsson demonstrated a unique technology to reveal cells harboring specific mutations
in tissue sections, while Ruedi Aebersold held an impressive lecture, illustrating about how powerful mass spectrometry provides a basis for for computational
analyses, commented
moderator Ulf Landegren.
Wednesday, Oct. 18, 11:00 a.m. - 12: 30 p.m., Room 230C, South Building Platform Session: Advances
in Association
Analysis Moderators: Leyao Wang, Yale University; and Ching - Ti Liu, Boston University
Saturday, Oct. 21, 9:45 - 10:45 a.m., Room 330A, South Building Platform Session: Advancing Drug Discovery by Genetic
Analysis in Large Cohorts
Moderator: Dana Crawford, Case Western Reserve University
Moderator: Bill
in DC asks — In your analysis, what data and assumptions did you make regarding energy efficiency potential in the end - use and power generation sectors, and what cost assumptions did you make for those resource
in DC asks —
In your analysis, what data and assumptions did you make regarding energy efficiency potential in the end - use and power generation sectors, and what cost assumptions did you make for those resource
In your
analysis, what data and assumptions did you make regarding energy efficiency potential
in the end - use and power generation sectors, and what cost assumptions did you make for those resource
in the end - use and power generation sectors, and what cost assumptions did you make for those resources?
Moderator, «All Bark, No Bite: An
Analysis of IP Contractual Terms That Are Unenforceable or Result
in Unintended Consequences,» Intellectual Property Owners Association 45th Annual Meeting, September 2017
Issues covered included the likelihood of getting a preliminary injunction
in trademark cases, the cost - benefit analysis of seeking injunctions, how these concerns affect litigation strategy, how to advise clients in such efforts, as well as developments to watch for going forward., Moderator, PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS IN TRADEMARK CASES, New York State Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section Litigation And Trademark Committe
in trademark cases, the cost - benefit
analysis of seeking injunctions, how these concerns affect litigation strategy, how to advise clients
in such efforts, as well as developments to watch for going forward., Moderator, PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS IN TRADEMARK CASES, New York State Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section Litigation And Trademark Committe
in such efforts, as well as developments to watch for going forward.,
Moderator, PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIONS
IN TRADEMARK CASES, New York State Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section Litigation And Trademark Committe
IN TRADEMARK CASES, New York State Bar Association, Intellectual Property Law Section Litigation And Trademark Committees
Moderator analyses showed no significant differences
in effect sizes across the levels of SSTP intervention, with the exception of child observations.
The primary parent was interviewed to determine family structure (eg, married, biological parents, single parent, adoptive parents); degree of contact the primary and secondary informants had with the child (eg, daily, episodic); relationship to the child (eg, biological parent, stepparent); number of children
in the home; race (categorical options, including other, were provided to the parent; this was done to meet federal reporting guidelines and, if sufficient variability was reported, to investigate race as a
moderator variable
in secondary
analyses); educational level and occupation of parental informants; and income level.
Moderator analyses with gender composition of the sample, geographic location, and type of informant were performed to explore possible explanations for heterogeneity
in the effect sizes across cross-sectional studies.
This new meta -
analysis seeks to update and expand both Gini and Pozzoli's and Reijntjes and colleagues» meta -
analyses3, 12 by (1) including the subsequently published studies that allowed to estimate the risk for psychosomatic problems
in children and adolescents who are bullied by peers (ie, cases) compared with nonbullied peers (ie, controls), (2) performing separate meta -
analyses of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, and (3) testing for potential
moderators of variation
in the magnitude of effect sizes.
In exploratory
analyses, 2
moderators were identified at the 2 - year follow - up (global EDE score, Wald1 = 4.0, P <.05, and self - esteem, Wald1 = 3.8, P <.05).
In order to test the influence of
moderator variables, we used an analogue of
analysis of variance and weighted ordinary least squares regression
analyses.
Although important, those results were limited by the small number of studies included
in the meta -
analysis (which also precluded the possibility of testing for possible
moderators), and the results were also limited by the fact that only 2 of them used a longitudinal design.
Finally, because the
moderator variables may not be independent from each other, we checked whether the observed bivariate
moderator effects would persist
in multivariate
analysis.
Moderators in psychotherapy meta -
analysis.
Articles discuss methodological challenges and opportunities
in family and couple research, including outcome, cost - effectiveness, qualitative, and narrative research; video - recall procedures, multilevel methods, diary methods, and cluster
analysis; and
moderator effects, the actor — partner interdependence model, survival
analysis, and ethical issues.
Name
moderators and briefly describe the purpose and application of the MacArthur Method of moderation
analysis in this randomized clinical trial.
Four
moderator analyses were conducted to investigate whether they could account for some of the variability
in the meta - analytic findings.
Unfortunately, none of our
moderator analyses reached statistical significance, which limits our ability to predict more specifically which factors are associated with insecure attachment
in individuals with CD / ODD despite the significant heterogeneity present
in the sample of studies examined.
A meta -
analysis is useful for identifying whether effect sizes are homogeneous across studies and
in the case where they are not,
moderators can be investigated to identify the source of the mixed results.
Because the participant's age does not remain constant
in longitudinal studies and is not representative
in retrospective studies, we removed the longitudinal and retrospective studies and conducted the
moderator analyses on the cross-sectional studies only (Table 4).
In order to test the potential
moderator effect between negative affectivity and effortful control on ODD - related problems, we conducted two separate multiple hierarchical regression
analyses, one for the parental and the other for the teacher rate of ODD - related problems.
Moderator analyses were performed
in five categories of parenting dimensions with regard to the informant of parenting (Table 3).
Finally,
in all
analyses testing for DO as a
moderator, we controlled for levels of HD and DD.
This age selected as a cutoff for the
moderator analysis in this sample was based on trends from the extant literature (Johnson et al., 1992) and clinical expectations.
Moreover, conducting
moderator analyses could result
in artifactual findings if study characteristics that are tested as
moderators would have been used as control variables
in the multivariate models of primary studies from which effect sizes are included
in the meta -
analysis.
The nature of significant interaction effects was determined by examining the main effects of sample status separately for the different levels of the
moderator in GLM
analyses of covariance, to statistically test the sample differences within the subgroups.
Some trials include co-occurring mental health problems as a predictor of intervention effects, but predictor
analyses fail to correct for change
in the control condition and can lead to misleading results (e.g., see Halldorsdottir and Ollendick 2016, for a comparison of predictor and
moderator analysis).
Children's initial problem severity is the only
moderator relatively consistently replicated across individual trials and meta -
analyses in parenting intervention research (e.g., Leijten et al. 2013; Menting et al. 2013).
Birth year of the infants was the most influential
moderator among the variables related to parental stress examined
in our meta -
analysis.
A second limitation is that due to the limited number of studies included
in some
analyses, not all
moderators could be tested for every stress (sub) scale.
Unfortunately, the percentage of SGA infants was not usually mentioned
in the studies included
in our meta -
analysis, which made it impossible to investigate this
moderator.