Sentences with phrase «in multiparous»

Relationships between plasma insulin - like growth factor - 1 and insulin concentrations in multiparous dairy cows with cytological endometritis

A high percentage of mammary adenocarcinomas (a large proportion of acinar - type) develop in multiparous females.

In multiparous women, perinatal outcome was significantly better for planned home births than for planned hospital births, with or without control for background variables.

On the basis of the 95th percentile threshold, historically, the latent phase has been defined as prolonged when it exceeds 20 hours in nulliparous women and 14 hours in multiparous women (18).

The duration of the second stage of labor and its relationship to neonatal outcomes has been less extensively studied in multiparous women.

For example, the recent Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development document suggested allowing one additional hour in the setting of an epidural, thus, at least 3 hours in multiparous women and 4 hours in nulliparous women be used to diagnose second - stage arrest, although that document did not clarify between pushing time or total second stage (33).

Given the available literature, before diagnosing arrest of labor in the second stage and if the maternal and fetal conditions permit, at least 2 hours of pushing in multiparous women and at least 3 hours of pushing in nulliparous women should be allowed (Table 3).

This decision uncertainty surrounding the most cost effective option was not found for place of birth in multiparous low risk women, on whom planned home birth had a 100 % probability of being the most cost effective option across all cost effectiveness thresholds between # 0 and # 100000 (table 3).

This decision uncertainty surrounding the most cost effective option was not found for place of birth in multiparous low risk women without complicating conditions, in whom planned home birth had a 100 % probability of being the most cost effective option across all thresholds of cost effectiveness (table 4).

Not exact matches

1.1.2 Explain to both multiparous and nulliparous women that they may choose any birth setting (home, freestanding midwifery unit, alongside midwifery unit or obstetric unit), and support them in their choice of setting wherever they choose to give birth: Advise low ‑ risk multiparous women that planning to give birth at home or in a midwifery ‑ led unit (freestanding or alongside) is particularly suitable for them because the rate of interventions is lower and the outcome for the baby is no different compared with an obstetric unit.

Women planning birth in a midwifery unit and multiparous women planning birth at home experience fewer interventions than those planning birth in an obstetric unit with no impact on perinatal outcomes.

For multiparous women there was no evidence of a difference in the primary outcome by planned place of birth.

For healthy multiparous women with a low risk pregnancy, there are no differences in adverse perinatal outcomes between planned births at home or in a midwifery unit compared with planned births in an obstetric unit

For multiparous women, there were no significant differences in the primary outcome between birth settings.

D. Krehbiel et al., «Peridural Anesthesia Disturbs Maternal Behavior in Primiparous and Multiparous Parturient Ewes,» Physiol Behav 40, no. 4 (1987): 463 — 472.

With regards to maternal outcomes in nulliparous and multiparous women, planned birth at home generated the greatest mean net benefit with a 100 % probability of being the optimal setting across all thresholds of cost effectiveness.

No difference in long - term outcomes for planned home versus planned hospital births for multiparous women.

In this study, the 95th percentile rate of active phase dilation was substantially slower than the standard rate derived from Friedman's work, varying from 0.5 cm / h to 0.7 cm / h for nulliparous women and from 0.5 cm / h to 1.3 cm / h for multiparous women (the ranges reflect that at more advanced dilation, labor proceeded more quickly)(Table 2).

A prospective study of the progress of labor in 220 nulliparous women and 99 multiparous women who spontaneously entered labor evaluated the benefit of prolonging oxytocin augmentation for an additional 4 hours (for a total of 8 hours) in patients who were dilated at least 3 cm and had unsatisfactory progress (either protraction or arrest) after an initial 4 - hour augmentation period (21).

Researchers have found that after a 3 - hour or more second stage of labor, only one in four nulliparous women (27) and one in three multiparous women give birth spontaneously, whereas up to 30 — 50 % may require operative delivery to give birth vaginally in the current second stage of labor threshold environment (30).

However, the multiparous women in our study were at low risk and their history would not have prompted referral to an obstetrician.

Power analysis, based on detecting a significant difference in the combined frequency of non-optimal factors during and after childbirth, led us to aim for a sample size of 1600 women, with approximately half being multiparous and preferably half choosing hospital birth.

A closer look at the background characteristics shows that multiparous women with a complicated previous pregnancy, including instrumental delivery in our study, were more likely to opt for hospital birth than for home birth.

Primiparous women and multiparous women were considered separately because of well known differences in outcome.

Multiparous women were more likely to choose a hospital birth if they belonged to an ethnic minority; had a non-optimal body mass (Quetelet index outside the range 18.8 - 24.2; P < 0.05); had a history of obstetric complications, preterm birth, or instrumental delivery; or had received medication (including vitamins and iron) in pregnancy (table 2).

Percentage non-optimal characteristics in the perinatal background index among planned home and planned hospital births in primiparous and multiparous women

Among multiparous participants, 27/29 (93 %) in the intervention group had previously breastfed, compared with 17/25 (68 %) in the control group.

Of women in our study with prolonged second stage diagnosed, 20.5 % were delivered in less than 3 hours (for primiparous women) and in less than 2 hours (for multiparous women) from the time of complete dilation.

In the second part, they examined male offspring of the multiparous females.

The study also found significantly more inflammation in the livers of multiparous animals.

Mice have a high incidence of Hodgkin's - like reticulum cell neoplasm at 18 months of age and pituitary tumors in old multiparous females.

Nevertheless, the MECSH trial showed some significant results and some trends that require replication in larger samples of mothers drawn from a similarly widely defined at - risk group, including older, multiparous mothers, and mothers with higher levels of education than have been reported in other trials.1 14 Mothers of infants and toddlers in the intervention group provided a home environment that was statistically significantly more supportive of their child's development through more verbal and emotional responsivity; however, the effect size was small.

Comparison of Primiparous and Multiparous Mothers: Healthy Families Program Participation, Outcomes, Challenges, and Adaptations, FY 1999 - FY 2010 (PDF - 316 KB) Galano & Huntington (2012) Pew Center for the States Presents an analysis and comparison of the participation and outcomes of mothers of multiple children and first - time mothers in Healthy Families home - visiting programs in Virginia to examine the idea that first - time mothers would benefit more from these services than mothers with previous children.