Sentences with phrase «in negligence cases so»

APIL highlights that thousands of seriously ill workers and bereaved families need the records held at Companies House to identify their former employers and the relevant insurers in negligence cases so that they can pursue them for compensation.

Not exact matches

Yes, I'm undoubtedly part of the «academic» legion (likely not the host, from the SCC's perspective) who've «spilled ink» over issues related to «the proper test for causation in cases of negligence» so I'm more attuned than some to these issues but that's not the point.
Accordingly, because right hook accidents so often involve the violation of Maine's statute prohibiting right hand turns in front of a cyclist unless it is safe to do so, negligence can frequently be established in these cases.
As such in every case your solicitor should seek to secure from the defendant insurer an early full admission of fault, and if the defendant is seeking to make an allegation of contributory negligence then get them to make it early so that your solicitor can properly gather the evidence to resist the same.
There are strict time limits involved in medical negligence cases, so please don't delay.
However, significant oxygen deprivation may result instead in brain damage and loss of income, in which case the person and / or their family or spouse might possibly be able to bring a suit in negligence, and so the legal question is not really irrelevant.
February 13, 1996 667 So.2 d 957 1996 Appellant seeks review of an adverse summary final judgment entered in a slip - and - fall negligence case.
In most cases, failing to put advice in writing is not negligence, so long as the advice was given clearly and the client understood iIn most cases, failing to put advice in writing is not negligence, so long as the advice was given clearly and the client understood iin writing is not negligence, so long as the advice was given clearly and the client understood it.
In doing so they have already decided that «unscrupulous» clinical negligence lawyers are to blame and fired the first shot with a sensationalist and gross misrepresentation of the realities of clinical negligence cases.
For example, in cases involving car accidents, we will do everything we can to determine the cause of the car accident (such as distracted drivers), so that we can properly work to determine negligence.
If the civil standard applied in relation to civil fraud so far as VAT is concerned, then there was no reason in principle why it should not apply to such matters in relation to income tax, and negligence was then an a fortiori case.
As a successful and award - winning personal injury law firm, our Santa Monica personal injury attorneys will fight for victims of negligence and if the case needs to be settled in front of a jury, so be it.
Different juries in different counties or areas of Virginia may have different opinions about whether contributory negligence applies in a certain case, so it is best to talk with an experienced Virginia personal injury attorney to learn how best to approach your case.
Well, they're like any other personal injury or wrongful death case, except that here in Florida and in many states around the country, nationally, so to speak, there have been caps put on medical negligence cases.
In Kentucky, personal injury cases must abide by the so - called comparative negligence doctrine.
Proving that someone's negligence caused your injuries is critically important to the success of your claim for compensation, but doing so is particularly difficult in cases involving truck accidents.
To a certain extent all professionals are consistently negligent so even in a rising market we still see some professional negligence cases such as structural surveys, issues missed or miss - reported during conveyancing and building matters.
If the case goes to court, in offences based on negligence, the court must determine whether an individual acted so carelessly or with such reckless disregard for the safety of others as to deserve criminal punishment.
This was to be distinguished from medical negligence cases, where it was sufficient to establish liability either to show that the relevant person (in most cases, the doctor) would have taken the requisite action, or that the proper discharge of their duty would require them to do so: see Bolitho v Hackney and City Health Authority [1998] AC 232.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z