«The big challenge has been that there hasn't been much research
in nonpregnant women of childbearing years.
Not exact matches
According to the Institute of Medicine, the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for iodine
in lactating
women is 290 μg per day, compared with 150 μg / day for
nonpregnant adults of both genders.
The researchers found that injection site and systemic reactogenicity (adverse reactions) rates
in pregnant
women were not significantly different than those observed among postpartum or
nonpregnant women.
Overall, the USPSTF found inadequate evidence on screening pelvic examinations for the early detection and treatment of a range of gynecologic conditions
in asymptomatic,
nonpregnant adult
women.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of performing screening pelvic examinations
in asymptomatic,
nonpregnant adult
women for the early detection and treatment of a range of gynecologic conditions.
To issue a new recommendation, the USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the accuracy, benefits, and potential harms of performing screening pelvic examinations
in asymptomatic,
nonpregnant adult
women 18 years and older who are not at increased risk for any specific gynecologic condition.
Among alcohol users 18 to 44 years old, 15 percent of
nonpregnant women and 1.4 percent of pregnant
women report that they binge drank
in the past month, according to a 2012 phone survey from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Approach to abnormal uterine bleeding
in nonpregnant reproductive - age
women.
389 D IETARY, FUNCTIONAL, AND TOTAL FIBER Total Fiber AI Summary, Ages 19 Years and Older AI for Men 19â $ «30 years 38 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 38 g / d of Total Fiber 51â $ «70 years 30 g / d of Total Fiber > 70 years 30 g / d of Total Fiber AI for
Women 19â $ «30 years 25 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 25 g / d of Total Fiber 51â $ «70 years 21 g / d of Total Fiber > 70 years 21 g / d of Total Fiber Pregnancy Method Used to Set the AI There is no evidence to suggest the beneficial effects of fiber in reduc - ing the risk of CHD for pregnant adolescent girls and women is different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and w
Women 19â $ «30 years 25 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 25 g / d of Total Fiber 51â $ «70 years 21 g / d of Total Fiber > 70 years 21 g / d of Total Fiber Pregnancy Method Used to Set the AI There is no evidence to suggest the beneficial effects of fiber
in reduc - ing the risk of CHD for pregnant adolescent girls and
women is different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and w
women is different from
nonpregnant adolescent girls and
womenwomen.
Total Fiber AI Summary, Pregnancy AI for Pregnant
Women 14â $ «18 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber 19â $ «30 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber Lactation Method Used to Set the AI There is no evidence to suggest the beneficial effects of fiber in reduc - ing the risk of CHD for lactating adolescent girls and women are different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and w
Women 14â $ «18 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber 19â $ «30 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber 31â $ «50 years 28 g / d of Total Fiber Lactation Method Used to Set the AI There is no evidence to suggest the beneficial effects of fiber
in reduc - ing the risk of CHD for lactating adolescent girls and
women are different from nonpregnant adolescent girls and w
women are different from
nonpregnant adolescent girls and
womenwomen.
Therefore,
in the current study, data were collected through an online questionnaire among pregnant (n = 66) and
nonpregnant (n = 59)
women with similar demographic profiles.
Moreover, knowledge on the differences between pregnant and
nonpregnant women's relationship satisfaction can offer insights into the drop
in satisfaction experienced by so many new parents.
More specifically, it was hypothesized that pregnant
women may have a more positive view of their relationship than
nonpregnant women, that is, that they would display a positive bias
in their relationship and partner satisfaction.
Sixty - six pregnant
women (mean age = 27.56, SD = 3.20) and 59
nonpregnant women (mean age = 27.24, SD = 3.54), all currently
in a heterosexual relationship, replied to these recruitments.
Therefore,
in the current paper we explicitly compared pregnant and
nonpregnant women to investigate whether pregnant
women's relationship satisfaction differs from
nonpregnant women, i.e. whether pregnant
women are more positive about their partner and their relationship than
nonpregnant women.
Ideally, one would also track a control group of
nonpregnant women for the same amount of time to investigate any fluctuations
in relationship or partner satisfaction across time, as well as between groups.
Moreover, we did not find any differences
in self - esteem between pregnant and
nonpregnant women.
To limit the influence of this possibility on our results, we chose to recruit
nonpregnant women who did indicate a desire to have children at one point
in their lives.
However, many of these studies do not explicitly compare pregnant
women with
nonpregnant women regarding their relationship satisfaction, whereas
in our opinion these comparisons can provide information on base levels of relationship satisfaction
in both these groups.