They are not that interested
in objective evidence unless it supports their claims.»
It is trust given with little or no basis
in objective evidence.
«Trump's rejection of trans troops in the US has no basis
in objective evidence.
Not exact matches
Instead, look at your
objective value to the company and the
evidence you uncovered
in your research.
There's a whole process that's set up to ensure that the jury that finally gets impaneled is an
objective group of people with no connection with anything going on
in the case that might persuade them to cast a decision that's inconsistent with the
evidence that's presented at the trial.
We believe that it is possible to identify which hat is
in front of us, based on
objective evidence.
Rather, both my opinion and our investment stance are driven by the
objective evidence we have
in hand about valuations and market action.
But the optimism around supposedly
objective algorithms has been challenged
in recent years by
evidence that some automated systems amplify bias because they're trained on data reflecting historical inequities.
Your continual denial of bias shows you have no desire to interpret any data
in an
objective way, but can be expected to use whatever data comes
in to confirm your biases, so I don't understand why you bother asking for
evidence besides the fact that you seem to think magic is possible or that we are
in a «matrix» computer program.
I reject your
evidence because it isn't
in any way based on «neutral,
objective fact».
Not necessarily
in tone or by being insulting (thankfully there's been relatively little of that from both sides), but
in that we require and unashamedly DEMAND real,
objective evidence.
Now, hypothetically, if you personally maintained belief
in a supreme being (one
in which you had no verifiable proof of its existence, but yet what you considered ample
evidence to place your faith
in) and that being had communicated morality
in absolute terms, would you define that morality as subjective or
objective?
Gary, Sabio claims that his beliefs are based on reason and objectivity and yet he totally ignores the
objective historical
evidence from the failure of atheistic Communism to usher
in an earthly Utopia that the cause of man (kind)'s individual and social ills is theistic beliefs.
No
objective evidence has been found
in over a century that refutes evolution.
Dalahäst I can believe
in love, compassion, forgiveness and hope because I have
objective evidence that things things are real.
That means
in every case where the validity of such a claim was established by
objective evidence it was determined to be false.
In any case, worry less about who people are and more about the fact that all you have are a lot of personal feelings and beliefs you can't support with
objective evidence.
If a person came to them
in their job and said another employee is not pulling their weight, they would demand
objective evidence.
In point of fact Christianity is an elaborate web of such theories and claims, none of which is supported by any
objective evidence.
Perhaps I am deluded to believe
in an all — powerful benevolent God, but it's the best explanation I can think of for the life experiences I have had and rationally, for that reason unless and until something happens or someone shows me something to give my
objective and indefatigable
evidence to the contrary, I can't sanely not believe.
In the religion, SBNR, atheism case, there is objective evidence against religions and none for them, there is no objective evidence for anything supernatural, there is objective evidence for much that was explained supernaturally in the past, and there are highly plausible explanations for purely natural universe supported by objective evidenc
In the religion, SBNR, atheism case, there is
objective evidence against religions and none for them, there is no
objective evidence for anything supernatural, there is
objective evidence for much that was explained supernaturally
in the past, and there are highly plausible explanations for purely natural universe supported by objective evidenc
in the past, and there are highly plausible explanations for purely natural universe supported by
objective evidence.
Not that the biblical god provides an
objective system, or that it is the best
objective system, but that somehow
objective morality
in an of itself is
evidence for god's existence.»
«A personal experience is fine, but without corrobrating
evidence of some kind, I don't have enough faith
in our ability as
objective observers to take it on your word alone.
Then
in the next breath, they claim the universe was created by a God that demands allegiance or you get an eternity of pain, but he loves everyone, ALL without one wit of
objective evidence.
That you prefer the gospel narrative over Smith and the 11 witnesses has nothing to do with an
objective view of the alleged «
evidence»; it is primarily the product of subjective faith
in your preferred narrative.
What factual,
objective, verifiable and independent
evidence do you, or any other believer, have to definitively and conclusively proof that a first cause is a god as portrayed
in The Babble?
Skeptics have faith
in what we can sense right now and the recorded histories that come with good
objective evidence.
On theoretical grounds, therefore, the subjective aspect of culture becomes less important than the
objective components
evidenced in texts, discourse, and expressive behavior.
I'm not saying they wouldn't believe
in god (s), but the precepts of their religion have no
objective evidence, the air skeptics breathe.
objective morality, when used as «
evidence» of the existence of god is classic circular reasoning; «I believe
in god because of the existence of
objective morality and I believe
in objective morality because I believe
in god.
If it is because you believe
in an alleged supernatural being for which there is no independent,
objective, factual or verifiable
evidence, then clearly it is you who is mentally ill, delusional and / or a liar.
Interesting as the tales may be, we should always bear
in mind that nothing should ever be accepted as «truth» without actual
objective evidence.
So,
in summary you don't actually have a proof, or even a single bit of factual, verifiable,
objective and independent
evidence for your unproven claims.
Eventually enough people will come to their senses and will pay more attention to
objective evidence - based research and not the simple little fairy tales
in religious texts that made sense back when humans were far less educated.
This verification is both by the
objective historical and literary
evidence and by the «reasons of the heart» which form so large a part of human existence and of Christian faith and experience
in particular.
Evolution has tons of
objective evidence (literally
in libraries around the world).
There is not a single bit of factual,
objective, independent or verifiable
evidence to support any of the supernatural claims
in The Babble.
This isn't the first study dedicated to this subject, but it is «one of the largest studies to date
in living retired NFL players» and the «first to demonstrate significant
objective evidence for traumatic brain injury
in these former players,» study author Francis X. Conidi of the Florida Center for Headache and Sports Neurology and Florida State University College of Medicine said
in a statement.
U.S. violations of international law, failure to curb covert activities, refusal on «national security grounds» to release key
evidence in the Iran - Contra and related trials, cooperation with drug runners
in pursuit of illegal foreign policy
objectives, and an obedient press all point dangerously towards a national security state.
Ironically atheists see religion as the great evil due to its content, and are blind to the deficiencies of their own ideologies — even
in light of historical
evidence of what happens when society purges itself of religion and
objective morality.
The
objective unity of the world, even though the experience of it may be difficult to reconstruct, is not of a character more lacking
in evidence than the concretion of the world
in actual, perishing occasions.
The task of a non-Muslim scholar writing about Islam is that of constructing an exposition that will do justice to the Western academic tradition, by growing directly out of the
objective evidence and by being rationally coherent both within itself and with all other knowledge, and at the same time will do justice to the faith
in men's hearts by commanding their assent once it is formulated.
The
objective evidence for the claim of probable increase
in the influence of Whitehead lies
in the increased volume of published work about his thought and the growing number of dissertations being written about him.
Complaints may arise about or
in relation to an applicant or client before, during or after the initial assessment process and must include
objective evidence that can be investigated.
Be
objective in your ratings and not be filled with hate even when
evidence says otherwise
I tried to come up with an
objective method to answer the question, but when it came time to vote
in the accompanying poll, a plurality of you ignored the
evidence and went with your gut, like they do on the MLB Network.
Links Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes
in developed countries.Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, DeVine D, Trikalinos T, Lau J.
OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the
evidence on the effects of breastfeeding on short - and long - term infant and maternal health outcomes
in developed countries.
Thus, the
objective of this review is to summarize the
evidence available
in these areas.
Objective 2: Freedom from Torture uses the expertise of torture survivors themselves and
evidence drawn from Freedom from Torture's work to improve the treatment, protection and conditions of torture survivors
in the UK
There's also quite a bit of
objective evidence that at least
in practice, governments that claimed to be communist simply haven't worked particularly well (and regardless of intent, most have turned into totalitarian dictatorships very quickly).