Sentences with phrase «in objective morality»

objective morality, when used as «evidence» of the existence of god is classic circular reasoning; «I believe in god because of the existence of objective morality and I believe in objective morality because I believe in god.

I don't believe in objective morality.

You don't believe in objective morality or when god ordered genocide it would also be immoral.

You would say my opinion doesn't matter; opinions don't count in objective morality.

Most humans believe in objective morality.

You can't really believe that atheists, agnostics, deists and other religions can not determine right from wrong because they do not believe in an objective morality, don't be so obtuse.

Not exact matches

In other words, you quoted the myth of your god to prove the concept of objective morality.

Her belief in absurd notion of objective morality shows extreme lack of intellect and thoughtfulness.

The proprietor of the shop obviously has the right to offer this type of discount, but it's sad that in this backwards, demon - haunted country we're still treating a work of fiction supposedly handed down by an magical, omnipotent being as a framework for a moral life, rather than embracing an objective, secular view of morality.

If we take the objective view and try to apply morality based on current American tradition god is immoral in a number of ways.

Now, hypothetically, if you personally maintained belief in a supreme being (one in which you had no verifiable proof of its existence, but yet what you considered ample evidence to place your faith in) and that being had communicated morality in absolute terms, would you define that morality as subjective or objective?

Atheist morality is without any objective basis and, if followed with integrity, doesn't allow them to act against others who act contrary to their moral system (as they insist that each subjective moral judgment is equal in value, all being based purely on individual feelings).

And while it is purely hypothetical in your particular case, it is nothing short of reality for tf, hence the reason he defines morality as objective.

In God's nature, a Christian can ground objective morality and say that things like child molestation and the Holocaust are objectively morally evil.

But again, if there is no objective standard of morality, then Catholic priests who molest children are not doing anything bad, because it was right in their own eyes.

So in certain cases, like statutory ra / pe, it isn't a question of objective morality but of cultural norms?

Also, i don't remember if you and I have discussed morality in the past, but do you believe morality is objective or subjective?

There are ways to be able to reason morality as objective (not in the usual religious sense however) without attributing it to a higher moral authority (god).

The religious think they get to determine objective beauty along with objective morality as they have deemed many many paintings inappropriate and have gone through periods of art burning in the name of their ignorant god.

Similarly, there is nothing in atheism that promotes a belief in an objective, external morality, or suggests that one has any sort of duty towards it.

There's also nothing in atheism that prevents belief in external, objective morality.

We certainly have good grounds for objective morality in this manner.

But ultimately, you are embracing the latter because you are arguing an objective / absolute morality in god's immutable good nature which is a source of morality beyond god's actual control.

Since the senseless ra - pe of an innocent bystander is objectively morally wrong and objective morality is grounded in the nature of God, then God can not command this for it is acting contrary to His nature and His nature doesn't change.

Dr. Harris realizes the existence of objective morality but by rejecting God, he has no foundation to ground it in.

Not that the biblical god provides an objective system, or that it is the best objective system, but that somehow objective morality in an of itself is evidence for god's existence.»

• the capacity to reach objective and universal truth as well as valid metaphysical knowledge; • the unity of body and soul in man; • the dignity of the human person; • relations between nature and freedom; • the importance of natural law and of the «sources of morality,»... • and the necessary conformity of civil law to moral law.

If morality is founded in God's nature and God is unchanging, we have the strongest foundation needed for objective morality.

But it can hardly be doubted that such a state of actually invincible error in moral questions exists also in society or in social groups in which the individual participates, so that his power of moral discernment does not go beyond a certain point, which, through no fault of his own, falls below objective morality.

It is His unchanging nature from which we can ground objective morality in.

By using genocide as as example of objective morality and not viewing god as immoral when he orders genocide in the Bible you only proving that morality is subjective.

Nowadays, morality is addressed in terms of «empathy» or doing «what you FEEL is right»... but morality is OBjective, not SUBjective, and God is the One to let us know what that morality is... not what you «think»...

Their reasoning goes something like this; I believe in God because objective morality exists and the reason I believe objective morality exists is because I believe in a god who holds that morality.

why feel the need to argue for an objective morality if you don't believe in the objective in the first place?

Powerful interest groups in many places, especially large cities, are often antagonistic to the traditional religious values of family, sexual self - control, objective morality, and individual responsibility.

once you concede that racism or any other major immorality could be deemed acceptable in the future, you are not talking about an objective basis for morality — because it changes.

None the less, if one responds as a whole person, one can have confidence in one's response as one can not have confidence in any objective knowledge or universal prescriptions of morality.

Vivas, for example, posits the «objectivity of evil» as the only alternative to its being merely subjective and defines morality in terms of the opposition between objective duty and subjective inclination:

The problem is much more radical: the modern West's rejection of objective morality, grounded in divine wisdom and intrinsic to human nature, the knowing and following of which is the only path to individual happiness and a just social order.

The current trend has been to accept the existential - historical view with the result that in theology the existential is preferred to the metaphysical, and in morality, the situational to the objective.

«Since the atheist does not believe in objective «right» or «wrong» (received divinely) but that morality is simply the product of culture and genetics - It is fascinating to see how angry they become at rulings like this... almost as if they believed the ruling objectively «wrong» (divinely received) or something...»

Feigning a discussion about objective vs. subjective morality without qualifying values in the example in an attempt to get the casual reader to focus on the value the crafty writer wants you to adopt a an absolute truth — in this case how bad it would be to BBQ your grandmother, so that he can claim the the reader believes in objective «truths».

Ironically atheists see religion as the great evil due to its content, and are blind to the deficiencies of their own ideologies — even in light of historical evidence of what happens when society purges itself of religion and objective morality.

The bible appears to promote violence in selected passages, but the very fact that Christians analyze scripture with the underlying belief that there is such a thing as an objective truth and morality we don't have the freedom in our doctrine to falsely interpret passages from Leviticus to justify killing while ignoring Christ and the ten commandments.

Agnosticism about human dignity and objective morality in various forms plays a significant role in the justification and promotion of «abortion rights» around the world.

Who's subjective morality or interpretation of ideology holds up in this case from an objective perspective?

In order to really judge the «morality» of the reforms, or their success in achieving their objectives, we need to properly understand the impact they are having on people's everyday liveIn order to really judge the «morality» of the reforms, or their success in achieving their objectives, we need to properly understand the impact they are having on people's everyday livein achieving their objectives, we need to properly understand the impact they are having on people's everyday lives.

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly) that do indeed provoke some inquiry towards the subject of dying and the boundaries of morality - but this film does none of that, Haneke's objective here is no different than in Funny Games: he simple wants to use the shock value to prove that we are captivated to a sickening extent by watching horror unfold before us.

The morality system can affect the objectives of your missions, to the point that your co-op buddy can actually become your in - game nemesis if each player's moralities are too divergent.

Science, if anything, has the defence that objective measure can be used to argue against subversion, as it never can be in religion, politics or morality.