Sentences with phrase «in ocean heat content»

This allows the remaining heat to be transported down deeper into the ocean, causing an increase in ocean heat content over the long - term.

You made a specific claim, that the resolution of the data is not sufficient to make a determination of a trend in ocean heat content.

[2] This, in turn, could have driven the higher rate of increase in ocean heat content shown in [1].

Unfortunately this method has led to numerous problems in the ocean heat content record.

There are also distinctive volcanic eruption signals in the ocean heat content record.

Despite short - term variability in ocean heat content storage, each region has experienced long - term warming.

That the ocean heat content is rising while surface temperatures flatten out is consistent with an energy imbalance that is visible in ocean heat content trends and satellite measurements.

However, for the purposes of this analysis it doesn't matter, since the swings in ocean heat content are nowhere near large enough to balance the budget.

Linear trends (1955 — 2003) of change in ocean heat content per unit surface area (W m — 2) for the 0 to 700 m layer, based on the work of Levitus et al. (2005a).

Any discussion of «climate sensitivity» that does not take into account the increasingly clear gains in ocean heat content going on are fairly meaningless, given that this ocean heat will be driving atmospheric temperatures as it always has.

A total of 2.3 million salinity profiles were used in this analysis, about one - third of the amount of data used in the ocean heat content estimates in Section 5.2.2.

This increase in ocean heat content corresponds to an average heating rate of 0.21 ± 0.04 W m — 2 for the Earth's surface.

A total of 2.3 million salinity profiles were used in this analysis, about one - third of the amount of data used in the ocean heat content estimates in Section 5.2.2.

With all the latencies in ocean heat content and other parts of that «pipeline», 450 ppm or higher is guaranteed to put us back in the Last Interglacial, at 4 - 6m higher sea level within centuries to a few millennia.

But there are offsets between GHGs / aerosol combinations and solar activity (especially as derived by Hoyt and Schatten), which may have been underestimated (see Stott e.a. 2003) If one simply should compare only the influence of solar (by H&S or even LBB) with the increase in heat content of the oceans, one can get a similar conclusion: that solar is the main driving force in ocean heat content.

It shows ocean warming in the shortwave — SW --(and longwave — LW — cooling) in the 1990's and a transient peak in ocean heat content.

Ah, in one Comment, 2003 saw a huge spike in Ocean Heat Content.

Even extending to pre-Argo periods, with a long period the errors in ocean heat content values have to be very large to have a major effect on the mean rate of heat uptake over the period.

Skippy «Lisa» Chief Hydrologist thinks he knows more about the growth in ocean heat content then one if the world's experts:

So what does Pielke think about these discrepancies in ocean heat content?