Sentences with phrase «in open society»

Privacy in an open society also requires cryptography.

Dr. Kelly Askin, Senior Legal Officer for International Justice in the Open Society Justice Initiative

People in our open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing.

A must read for anyone interested to know what Russians really think of the States, and how the soviet Russian mind tries to survive in the open society of the West.

How should we think about intelligence, education, and opportunity in an open society?

Sapphic web free sex personals adult dating singles is starting to become more and more popular in open society.

Lesbian classifieds is beginning to become more and more popular in open society.

Lesbian dating is becoming more and more popular in open society.

The House of Lords is holding a debate on two key British Humanist Association (BHA) publications: The Case for Secularism: A Neutral State in an Open Society and Quality and Equality: Human Rights, Public Services and Religious Organisations.

The findings were reported in the Open Society Foundation's «Europe's White Working Class Community: Manchester», with research conducted by Amina Lone and Daniel Silver of the Social Action and Research Foundation (SARF)-- a social enterprise that produces policies to combat poverty.

We do not have the right to take justice into our own hands: this is Caesar's domain, and if Caesar's law is wrong, in an open society we must oppose that law, not those who partake of its liberties.

Whereas membership of a closed society helped to provide personal identity («I'm a Scotsman», for example, or «I'm a Presbyterian»), individuals in the open society are both freer and have more responsibility to establish their own identity.

In the open society, where external authority is greatly reduced, much more responsibility rests with each individual to promote the welfare of the society.

I cherish instead the notion that if we could understand not only the sociology and psychology of religion but also the religion of religion; if we could get at the roots of conviction in the lives of profound believers in the open society; if we could combine civility with devotion — if we could do these things, religious forces might retrieve some initiative and offer examples for coexistence in the world of the nations and the military powers.

Put another way, in an open society where long - term corporate performance is built on trust among its various constituencies, it is difficult to defend hiding such direct corporate action (or forcing stakeholders to piece information together from myriad reports), even though a comprehensive report may cause stakeholder or media scrutiny and criticism.

I think that we who live in open societies have a duty to try to influence where and when we can, win or lose.

History has shown that rigorous environmental protections are most likely to be instituted and enforced in open societies where an independent judicial branch, media, activists and public can freely challenge government and business interests.

Not exact matches

While it is clear that as a society, there is still a lot of work to do to advance respectful, open dialogues, the events over the weekend serve as a reminder of why we — as leaders — rallied behind the CEO Action for Diversity & InclusionTM in the first place, and how important it is to create candid, safe, and trusting environments for our employees and communities.

In British Columbia, the B.C. Pain Society opened up a pot vending machine just a few weeks ago.

Farquharson's CV says he spent a summer as an intern with the Centre for Democracy and Peace Building in Northern Ireland, appeared in a rugby video played at the World Cup opening ceremony in 2015 (which Prince Harry also appeared in), and was a member of the Rugby School's chemistry club, the Blue Bunsen Society.

Created by Soros in 1979, Open Society is a grant - making foundation with branches and partners around the world and focuses on supporting democracies and combating issues of injustice and discrimination, among other causes.

And while it's a cliche to say that we're now part of an information - based economy and society, «our future... is almost certain to be an intensification of our present reality: greater and greater information dependence in every matter of life and work,» all relying on an open Internet.

When asked in an open - ended question what traits society values most in men and women, the differences were also striking.

«America's strengths include [the fact it is a] society that attracts talent from around the world and assimilates them comfortably as Americans; and a language that is the equivalent of an open system that is clearly the lingua franca of the leaders in science, technology, invention, business, education, diplomacy and those who rise to the top of their own societies around the world.»

But otherwise it is to wonder if the Prime Minister was a touch disappointment when he opened the budget book last Thursday and found that, not only hadn't the Finance Minister eliminated all taxes, but he'd seen fit to budget for several increases in the cost of civil society.

It's just a shame that we haven't come to the point in society where it should be required that those who make decisions must meet certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria proving their intellect and open mindedness as well as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative views (even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their beliefs... this happens more than many people realize) and overall ignorant minds.

However Katharine Jefferts Schori, of The Episcopal Church, said in a statement: «I rejoice that the Supreme Court has opened the way for the love of two people to be recognized by all the states of this Union, and that the Court has recognized that it is this enduring, humble love that extends beyond the grave that is to be treasured by society wherever it exists.

In an «open society» the option is there for exploration.

Secondly, however, and more importantly for the purposes of this article, Ford's stipulation that natural compounds are larger or more complex actual entities rather than structured societies implicitly confirms the entitative or substantialist understanding of actual occasions criticized in the opening paragraphs of this article.

In Germany the discussion was intensified by the fact that the opening of the play coincided with a meeting of the Society for Christian - Jewish Co-operation, which issued statements criticizing the play and suggested that a committee consisting of a Catholic, a Protestant and a Jew be formed to advise on revisions of the text.

Ref to your words... «As a Christian, this provokes a great deal of sadness in me and others who are committed to transforming Syria into an open, democratic, inclusive, secular and religiously tolerant society.»

The dynamics of a free and open society, in which the individual has full range for creative capacities, have shown their superiority over tyranny built upon a 19th - century ideology.

In these times of stress - in a society pressured on all sides, moving toward its breaking point - play can purify our sensibility, make us open again to the gifts of God's goodness which surround uIn these times of stress - in a society pressured on all sides, moving toward its breaking point - play can purify our sensibility, make us open again to the gifts of God's goodness which surround uin a society pressured on all sides, moving toward its breaking point - play can purify our sensibility, make us open again to the gifts of God's goodness which surround us.

But there is also the promise of a unified planetary society living in harmony with nature, using the natural resources of the earth for the benefit of all the earth's living creatures, and opening up prospects of human adventures never before possible.

Even if we deny that Jesus worked for transformation in the explicit sense of deriving the dialectic of individual and society from social structures, or beginning the process of transformation with changes in property and social relationships, it can not be overlooked that in an indirect sense, the manner in which Jesus thought and acted de facto broke open and transformed the social structures of the world in which he lived.7

But if they live in a rich society, they depend in fact on the existence of those economic mechanisms, technical rigors, and open or hidden violences that form the warp of that society.

In truth, the presence or absence of poverty in this economically advanced society is now a matter open to public choicIn truth, the presence or absence of poverty in this economically advanced society is now a matter open to public choicin this economically advanced society is now a matter open to public choice.

Fundamentalists claim that the erosion of this opened up a spiritual vacuum in society.

«3 Whereas John Cobb recalled Whitehead's identification of molecules as «historic routes of actual occasions,» Donald Sherburne prefers the designation as «structured societies» — which leaves open the question of whether both a molecule and its constituent can be «enduring objects» (like a personal society).4 Enthused by Leclerc's reliance upon the Aristotelian distinction between actual and potential, Ford offered an option which might preserve the choice, in Whiteheadian terms.

Here we had a minister in his study with some books, clearly including the Bible, an open window showing some symbols (like a factory) of the activity and confusion of modern society, and something like a typewriter to show the minister as an active scholar and not just a passive recipient.

For Solidarnosc showed in the most unlikely circumstances the power of freedom in the lives of men driven by their faith and its vision (per John Paul II) of a free and open society.

It is sometimes suggested that the future of society in the West» and so, perhaps, the world» is open to three «options»: Christianity, Islam, and a consumerism so devoid of transcendent values as to be, inevitably, nothing but a pervasive and pitiless nihilism.

Given the latest medical data concerning the distinct characteristics of the fetus and its ability to survive outside the womb at a startlingly early age, it is little wonder that in the past few years several of the denominations that once took a more open position on abortion have retreated somewhat: the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is now studying the issue; in a 1980 statement on social principles, the UMC moved to a more qualified position; the Episcopal Church and the recently formed Evangelical Lutheran Church in America seem to be in the process of toning down their earlier positions (or those of a predecessor body) The Lutherans defeated a resolution in their 1989 Assembly which would have been consistent with the liberal position of the LCA predecessor body, and a 1988 Lutheran - Episcopal dialogue report refers to the fetus as «embryonic humanity» with claims on society.

The articles weren't actually addressed to the Pope directly; they were just written in the «open letter» style as a way to examine issues going on in society from the perspective of a religious skeptic.

Contemporary societies are far more open than in the past» and more peaceful, too.

Matters of belief should be discussed with care and an open view for the thoughts of others on all sides or someday we will live in a society like Pakistan where Ministers get shot for their belief and scharia is forced upon the people.

But their critical stance has had the consequence, as Milton Gordon has pointed out, 12 that the intellectuals are the one major group in American society that is open to individuals of all ethnic backgrounds, in practice as well as in theory.

The willingness of President Bush (in his better moments) to spend money to shore up civil society — making it perhaps less necessary to spend money down the road, as the promise of the «ownership society» was fulfilled — was taken as an opportunity by those not invested in that «limited» project (I have in mind here both the conventional Republicans in the Bush White House and the pork - barrelling Republicans in the House and Senate) to open the federal purse with relative abandon.

An open society, on the other hand, is organized on the basis of functional pluralism, in which every person is classified in many different ways, each for a particular purpose, and in which no single general rank order is recognized.

Human society almost everywhere is undergoing the transition from being a predominantly closed society to a more open society (as discussed in Chapter 8).