Andy readily admits that he's still stuck on denial, and from there he raises a big question that we've heard
in other critiques of the report: Can we really trust the measures of teacher performance we used to reach our conclusions about professional development?
Not exact matches
Entrepreneurs who
critique other businesses but never dare to take great leaps
in their own work are the real impostors.
Copy
Critiques:
In these one - hour sessions, we go over a sales letter, or a video sales letter script, or a webinar script, or a magazine or newspaper ad... or just about any
other kind of copy you'd like to get the best sales results from.
Yet the statement drew some swift
critiques given that,
in recent days, a number of accounts — including the support team for cryptocurrency exchange Kraken — reported that they had seen their accounts restricted despite trying to warn
others about copycat accounts that mimic well - known industry members.
I ask this for three reasons: 1) Warfield begins the chapter with Edward Gibbon's conversion to Catholicism, which was related to Gibbon's belief
in the continuation of the miraculous; 2) he spends several pages
in the same chapter
critiquing another famous convert to Catholicism, John Henry Newman, noting what he sees as Newman's shift toward the miraculous; 3) even though he knows that Gregory of Nyssa, Athanasius, and Jerome all wrote about saints
in which the miraculous was prominent, he still makes the claim that these «saints» lives» follow
other Christian romances and thus represent an infusion of Heathenism into the church.
In these moments, as we are faced with the choice of whether to release the narratives we have built to
others or to simply forget them, there is one question that we must ask ourselves: Am I complaining or am I
critiquing?
The general idea is that some elements
in the hierarchical field are abstract enough to be included
in a formal category of relationships that applies to
other events
in other durations and that such applications may be formally derived and analyzed without prejudice to the
critique of narrative elements described previously.
The
critique by a young freshman
in the back row of the class can hold its own against the views of Richard Rorty, for the one no less than the
other provides a fresh reading of the text.
We can
critique problems
in the church without making martyrs out of those those who choose to use dysfunctional churches to victimize
others.
Many parts of Finkelstein's
critique of the contemporary Jewish world have been made before by
other leftist Jews, for instance by Lenni Brenner
in Jews
in America Today (1986), while venomous anti «Zionism has been a stock «
in «trade of the extreme left since the 1960s.
Still, ideally, each family participates as one family among
others in affirming,
critiquing, and modifying those larger patterns.
Shrugging off those
critiques, on the
other hand, means ignoring the ways
in which the fashion industry does genuine harm.
(c) Because these interests are socioculturally situated they are diversely concrete, threatening to fragment «understandings» of God, and they are open to the suspicion of ideological bias; but because they are interests
in God the capacities they guide also require cultivation of capacities for conversation with
other concrete understandings and capacities for
critique of ideological self - deceptions.
Make no mistake: when I
critique the church and ministries going on
in her name, when I
critique other people's ideas and activities, when I let loose on the goings - on
in religion, this doesn't mean I hate the perpetuators.
In two separate sections, Drs. Capek and Stearns agree and
critique each
other on their views of determinism as held by contemporary process philosophy.
When I reflect on the infinite pains to which the human mind and heart will go
in order to protect itself from the full impact of reality, when I recall the mordant analyses of religious belief which stem from the works of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud and, furthermore, recognize the truth of so much of what these critics of religion have had to say, when I engage
in a philosophical
critique of the language of theology and am constrained to admit that it is a continual attempt to say what can not properly be said and am thereby led to wonder whether its claim to cognition can possibly be valid — when I ask these questions of myself and
others like them (as I can not help asking and, what is more, feel obliged to ask), is not the conclusion forced upon me that my faith is a delusion?
These two
critiques of development — the third World liberation perspective and the First World ecological perspective — soon appeared to be
in considerable conflict with each
other.
Feminism challenges the legitimacy of sex roles Along with
other social movements, feminism is rooted
in the
critique that a society so constructed that certain people and groups profit from inequalities — between men and women, rich and poor, black and white, etc. — is a society
in which money is more highly valued than love, justice, and human life itself.
I have changed it slightly to indicate that our goal is to
critique both the primal and modern visions of human being and society
in the light of each
other and
in the light of the theological vision of God's purpose for the future of humankind.
Spelled out
in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals
in the Social Struggle,» as well as
in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the time period involved (it pushed
others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement
in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural
critique on the American political system.
Christians have the opportunity and the duty to
critique these assumptions and offer
others that seem more suitable
in light of Christian faith.
Bishop Paulose concludes this discussion, «
In this way we respond to Marx's critique of religion that Christianity is not the opium of the people but a way of life in which the Christian participates in Jesus» «being there for others», for the total humanization of humanity.&raqu
In this way we respond to Marx's
critique of religion that Christianity is not the opium of the people but a way of life
in which the Christian participates in Jesus» «being there for others», for the total humanization of humanity.&raqu
in which the Christian participates
in Jesus» «being there for others», for the total humanization of humanity.&raqu
in Jesus» «being there for
others», for the total humanization of humanity.»
Jürgen Moltmann, on the
other hand, emphasized the difference between the new and the old meanings of political theology depicting what had earlier been called political theology as the ideology of political religion, which is the symbolic integration of the beliefs of a people through which they sanction and sanctify their traditions and their ambitions.12 Moltmann strongly supports Peterson
in his
critique of political theology
in this sense.13 It is the task of what is properly called political theology —
in Metz's sense — to unmask the pretenses of political religions.
In separate essays, Charles Hartshorne77 and Lewis Ford78 point out the serious misunderstandings of Whitehead at work in this critique, and Ford and others explain the Whiteheadian solution to the problem of evil as follows: 79 God does not wholly determine the course of the temporal proces
In separate essays, Charles Hartshorne77 and Lewis Ford78 point out the serious misunderstandings of Whitehead at work
in this critique, and Ford and others explain the Whiteheadian solution to the problem of evil as follows: 79 God does not wholly determine the course of the temporal proces
in this
critique, and Ford and
others explain the Whiteheadian solution to the problem of evil as follows: 79 God does not wholly determine the course of the temporal process.
Otherwise when individual black women try to seek healing and try to move away from the Strong Black Woman, they're very much
critiqued by
other black women who are still
in the throes of that identity.
On the
other hand, even when leaders are committed to seeking social justice, they have not been able to sustain a legitimate
critique of poverty and injustice
in America because the family ideals of the American Dream continue to be linked to democratic values and economic stability.
At the very core of Prof. Levenson's
critique of Dabru Emet was the fact that this «Jewish Statement on Christians and Christianity» imagines that,
in their historic theological attitudes toward each
other, there is somehow a balanced «dialectical» relationship between Christianity and Judaism.
[I'm not convinced that one side or the
other has the edge on «bullying,» but I certainly share Caryn's serious concerns over governments threatening to withold building permits from Chick - fil - A, (the same strategy was used here
in East Tennessee to try and prevent local Muslims from building a mosque), and her
critique of the unfortunate public «outing» this controversy inspired.]
And then, of course, a tradition that is capable of self -
critique, a tradition that is capable of affirming the truth found
in all
other traditions — that is something that could actually help you.
I say
critique away — and maybe that
critiquing will help influence
other churches — and we see some large scale changes
in the way church looks, thinks, and acts.
The thing is, Black Six, that while your overall point is good, the last sentence implies an incorrect assumption, which is what the
other posters are
critiquing,
In other words, you have a point, but so do they, and it's not idiotic.
In some instances such
critiques are justifiable, but at
other times they are out of place.
For the story I'm writing, well - known published writers
in our
critique group, who were getting their stuff published
in paper by CBA publishers commented, among
other things: - «The scene where Tammy throws her bikini up into the tree would never get published by a CBA publisher.»
Also, Leclerc's
critique ignores
other features of Whitehead's way of overcoming reductionism which were discussed
in Section II.
Dreyfus's own
critique is made from the standpoint of phenomenology, but his philosophical perspective and that of a number of
other critics of artificial intelligence is similar
in some ways to Hall's.
In this paper, I will evaluate neither the process
critique of the traditional doctrine of God nor the recent defenses of that doctrine as articulated by Burrell and
others.
And it probably doesn't hurt for all of us to get regular reminders that we need to be mindful of our heart attitude
in all situations (and perhaps particularly
in instances where we would
critique others, directly or indirectly).
The classical Christian synthesis of the power of God and the love of God — forged
in those formative years of contact with Greek philosophy, hammered out by Augustine and Aquinas and
other giants of Christian thought, fractured by the
critiques of Dostoyevsky and Nietzsche and their comrades
in intellectual arms — was smashed to pieces by the overwhelming human devastation that was the Holocaust.
The first reason the Bible is unique among all the writings of the world religions is that the Hebrew Scriptures contain an early unmasking and
critique of what René Girard calls «mimetic rivalry» which he claims is not found
in any
other religious writings.
Glen Stassen gives a scathing
critique of the Bush administration concerning his policies effecting mothers, parents, babies, pregnant teenagers, the poor, and so many
others caught
in the downward spiral of his policies.
You wrote, «I could offer
other critiques as well (for example,
in several of your references above, you make the exegetical mistake called an «illegitmate totality transfer»), but frankly, this is getting tiring.
I do not find this so strongly
in other process thinkers, and insofar as Muray will not be more specific than that the criterion for reconstituting a tradition is «whatever contributes to the enhancement of relationality and creativity that are true of the fundamental character of reality itself» (93), I do not think he will much like the basis of Hauerwas»
critique, namely the stories of the history of Israel and Jesus as they continue to be remembered and enacted
in the Christian church.
In other words, Spadaro and Figueroa see Pope Francis as contradicting the fundamentalist, integralist views they
critique.
On the
other hand, by taking account
in Critique et Religion of previous attempts at synthesis, he allows for the point about what may already be considered as dismissed and for the elimination of a certain number of false ideas which would compromise the research to which his books invite us.
Padgett's warning about comprehensive metaphysical systems and Powell's
critique that process thought does not sufficiently recognize the difference between God's being and
other beings make specific the concern
in Searching that God not be limited by metaphysical categories.
Hence, part of the task of white process theologians is to complement the work of Black (and
other liberation) theologies by engaging
in theory -
critique and proposing alternative directions for global economic systems.
Lasch is especially devastating
in his
critique of radical chic and
other forms of decadent leftism that freely condemn «ways of life of which they know little and to which they feel nothing but contempt from their safe perch.»
Students veer into
other disciplines, and our culture as a whole adopts an ironic tone, a defense mechanism we may regret but which is entirely understandable
in an intellectual environment of unmasking and
critique.
Thus, Bergson's proto - mentalism is also interpretable as the positive face of the
critique of simple location.4 The fallacy of simple location is the basis for the view,
in both physical and logical atomism, that the «individuality of the atom [and of objects
in general] is based precisely on its [or their] ontological separation from
other simply located entities» (BMP 309).
While some attention has been drawn to the Christian
critique of sex and violence
in television programming, the
critique must also include
other dehumanizing aspects such as consumerism, limited access for such groups as minorities and older people and the continuing exploitation of children and youth.