How is it that people claiming to be Christians are not sure about something as basic and entrenched
in our belief system as the doctrine of hell?
Not exact matches
«Émile Durkheim understood religion not
as belief in the supernatural (
as the popular conception would have it), but
as a
system of
beliefs and practices relating to sacred things.
Many saw it
as an aggressive Western attack on femininity and a Russian
belief system in which women are encouraged, and expected, to see motherhood
as their first priority.
Loyola keeping a Catholic identity helps promote real intellectual diversity
in American public life (and, again, I'd say the same
as to other religious universities; I can imagine some religious
belief systems that are so pernicious that, while they must be constitutionally protected, we can still say they hurt American life more than they help it, but I think that most of the traditions that found universities do have a good deal to contribute).
This mistaken
belief that American savings are wholly a function of American household preferences arises because most economists — and, it seems, policymakers — can only imagine American households
as autonomous economic units, and are seemingly incapable of imaging them
as units within a
system in which there are certain inflexible constraints.
Modern science is the cornerstone of your
belief system,
as ancient writings that I consider to be God given, holy inspired and very relevant to modern times (
as well
as every society that ever was and will be) is the cornerstone of my
belief system, because everything about this book has been accurate
in every way, unlike modern science.
As for me, I want to know and commune with a being that,
in my
belief system, created me and died for me.
``...
as ancient writings that I consider to be God given, holy inspired and very relevant to modern times (
as well
as every society that ever was and will be) is the cornerstone of my
belief system, because everything about this book has been accurate
in every way, unlike modern science.»
So, using simple logic that I assume you would be able to perform (since you feel you are superior), atheism can be defined
as a religion,
in that it is a
belief system and worldview (i.e: a religion).
It's a law
in congress stating everyone should pray, it sure
as hell then applies to me, especially when it's my government promoting a specific
belief system.
When christianity,
as with many
belief systems before it, started people lived
in tribal like communities.
Unless it was meant for us
as a new
system to drop Republican
systems for the Royalist
systems that are taking place now that Jordan and Morocco both Royelists are planed to join GCC
as one with a change to the name of the GCC since the Royalist empire will be extending to countries outer of the Arabian Gulf Countries... What ever it is all we need is freedom of rights, justice, peace, equality and to live
in prosperity... Egypt is not
in the heart of Egyptions only but
as well
in the heart of every Arabic nation, Egyptions were our teachers
in our schools and Egypt was the university of our Yemeni students... Egypt was the source of islamic educations, Egypt was the face of all arts, books, papers, TV plays and movies to all of Arabian speaking countries... Egypt is our Arabian Icon so please please other nations are becoming larger and stronger
in the area on your account
as a living icon for the Arabian Unity what ever our faiths or
beliefs are we are brothers
in blood, culture and language, God Bless to All.Amen.
As I mention above, the issue needs to be raised to believers and non-believers alike: How can a nation of people miss the outright hypocrisy of using a
belief system ostensibly predicated on compassion, charity and humility to argue
in favour of genocide?
As I don't carry enough theological weight to help my fellow believers
in this debate with evidence or valuable dialog, and I was never able to cement myself
in mt attempt to be an atheist, I can only say that when I tried to de-construct my
belief system and embrace the scientific angle, it fell flat.
then you use faith
in your
beliefs the same
as any religion and yes you do have a
belief it is that there is no god, that is not absence of believing that is the presence of a
belief system
In another sense, however, conservatism does rest in a system of belief, and is opposed as much to the theory as to the practice of socialist and liberal politic
In another sense, however, conservatism does rest
in a system of belief, and is opposed as much to the theory as to the practice of socialist and liberal politic
in a
system of
belief, and is opposed
as much to the theory
as to the practice of socialist and liberal politics.
If you identify yourself
as belonging to a particular group you are then put
in the «box» of a particlar
belief system, even if you personally do not necessarily agree with all that «group».
Neither qualify
as a
belief system, though
in the sense of western religions.
In the early days, he would only dive into his doctrine (attempts to shock you into his
belief system) off - lab when we'd go out to lunch
as a group.
And to live
in society and even just have friends one must prove he or she is a «moral» person, this morality is just a morality that lacks gods, such
as a
belief that what is good is what brings about the most happiness or freedom or whatever your ethical
system supports.
In most
belief systems sacrifices are required, such
as foregoing carnal pleasures, donating money, leading an appropriate lifestyle, and so on.
It is our duty
as Americans to know and appreciate the
systems of
belief — the mythic cosmologies, the scientific laws, the common - sense attitudes — that
in times past have served to give coherence and purpose to our life together.
My favorite line is to tell them that,
in any
belief system they decide to get into, ask
as many questions
as you can — the hardest ones you can find.
A «primary framework» is one «seen
as rendering what would otherwise be a meaningless aspect of the scene into something that is meaningful» (FA 21), and the frame for all such primary frameworks, the understandings shared by a group regarding interpretive schemata, their interrelationships, and «the sum total of forces and agents that these [schemata] acknowledge to be loose
in the world,» constitute its «
belief system» or «cosmology» (FA 27).
Indeed, just
as the world is filled with selfappointed salesmen for God, it is also filled with evangelical atheists who are equally determined to convert anyone who will listen to their
belief system, their faith
in the non-existence of God.
The fanatical
belief systems of these fundamentalists is characterised
as «medieval» (e.g.
in https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/), used here
in the sense of being centuries out of date and repressive, contrasted with the «liberated» society
in which we live
in the West.
As pointed out by Ducati, your atheism is a protected
belief system in the UK.
Stripped of any
belief in the kind of higher consolation that makes sense of life's inevitable injustices and humdrum frustrations, the demands that people place on the political
system «become
as infinite
as the infinity they have lost.»
If we assume,
as I think is reasonable, that the vast majority of these
belief systems are the creations of sincere people striving to understand their god or gods, why do they have nothing
in common?
«Sadly, it seems to be increasingly acceptable
in certain
belief systems to kill
as many members of the other religious community
as possible,» she said.
Since the
belief system of a parish includes not only its formal creeds but also the meanings it assigns to itself and its members
as finite bodies, to learn about a church's world view — what it believes is really going on
in life — one must listen to the church's stories about its own body and those of the members who constitute it.
As far as I can tell, they just see it as an outstanding problem that is not as important as the other concepts in their belief syste
As far
as I can tell, they just see it as an outstanding problem that is not as important as the other concepts in their belief syste
as I can tell, they just see it
as an outstanding problem that is not as important as the other concepts in their belief syste
as an outstanding problem that is not
as important as the other concepts in their belief syste
as important
as the other concepts in their belief syste
as the other concepts
in their
belief system.
Thus, by your logic, you should have no problem with Muslims making up 80 - 90 % of your country's population, voting primarily for Muslim candidates, and constantly striving to make their
belief system the law of the land -
as is the case with Christians
in the United States.
As much as you're not so much offering a product, you are trying to sell your fallacious belief system and in turn recruit... silly Christian showing hypocris
As much
as you're not so much offering a product, you are trying to sell your fallacious belief system and in turn recruit... silly Christian showing hypocris
as you're not so much offering a product, you are trying to sell your fallacious
belief system and
in turn recruit... silly Christian showing hypocrisy!
As Roof points out, their religion affirms: (a) the centrality of ethical principles in their meaning systems; (b) a parsimony of beliefs, few attributions of numinosity; (c) breadth of perspective; (d) piety defined as a personal search for meaning; and (e) license to doub
As Roof points out, their religion affirms: (a) the centrality of ethical principles
in their meaning
systems; (b) a parsimony of
beliefs, few attributions of numinosity; (c) breadth of perspective; (d) piety defined
as a personal search for meaning; and (e) license to doub
as a personal search for meaning; and (e) license to doubt.
What I can tell about our shared experience with Mormon doctrine is this: Yes, there was a big emphasis on Jesus» ours being a more conventional, fairly trinitarian concept of our Lord» but,
as strong
as that emphasis was, it never managed to trump the implied and de facto role of Joseph Smith
in our
belief system.
We
as human beings driven by instinctual needs with
belief systems we must negotiate even if we don't fully subscribe to them are constantly working
in an environment of unknowns.
Someone administering aid to a person afflicted with disease
in Africa, for example, may be a representative of a
belief system that I believe contributes to the spread of said disease, but I would certainly at least respect the caregiver,
as I said, for their actions.
1) That
in no way addresses my post 2) I don't believe
in sin 3) Eternal condemnation for a finitie «sin» is an unjust and immoral
system,
as is eternal reward for holding a specific
belief instead of a totality of actions taken, and the innermost part of a humans morality.
But, yes, some pretty much are prostelyzing and defending their
belief system (or their non-
belief systems)
as much and
in some cases even more than religious people do.
Moreover, both sides, much like the Repubs and Demos
in our political
system, can not view anything passed the length of our own noses if it is
in contrast to the «
beliefs» we hold dear to us
as humans.
In the world of «
belief systems» this is known
as a * self - sealing *
belief.
I find that Whitehead's exposition is question - begging and seriously misleading.4 The exposition is misleading insofar
as it suggests that
belief in either a specific or generic causal nexus is adequately justified by a subject's experience of CE alone and not ultimately by systematic considerations, particularly those related to prehension.5 If Whitehead's theory of perception was intended to stand alone without support from the rest of his
system,
as Ford suggests (EWM 181 - 182), then I claim that it is insufficiently justified insofar
as a part of it, the theory of CE, is inadequately justified.
There is just
as much foundation and support for the Flying Spaghetti Monster
as that is available
in your
belief system.
either something is wrong with you (
as an agent
in your
system of
belief) or something is inherently wrong with the
system itself.
or those who have been saying that science is another «
belief system» what they don't understand is that while science has many theories, and not
as many «laws» is that the rigors that are used to support theories are much more intense than «the man
in the clouds spoke to me.»
Scripture is
in all
belief system so one really can not claim a select scripture
as definitive proof.
In the absence of evidence, you must have tremendous faith as an evolutionist in your «belief system»
In the absence of evidence, you must have tremendous faith
as an evolutionist
in your «belief system»
in your «
belief system».
As a white, middle - class woman living in California, rarely have I faced real pain as a result of complex systems, and strongly held societal, cultural or political traditions and belief
As a white, middle - class woman living
in California, rarely have I faced real pain
as a result of complex systems, and strongly held societal, cultural or political traditions and belief
as a result of complex
systems, and strongly held societal, cultural or political traditions and
beliefs.
If there is a
belief system that can be accurately described
as childish and immature... it's atheism... like sticking your fingers
in your ears
in singing «la la I cant hear you I wan na believe what I feel like believing!