Sentences with phrase «in our systems of»

Such a paradigm shift in the system of provider incentives can have a broad and surprising effect on how all of us live our lives.
In this system of belief, networked computers will rule the future.
Because of the obvious importance of the nomination right in our system of corporate governance, Delaware courts have been reluctant to approve measures that impede the ability of stockholders to nominate candidates.
In a system of mutual teaching and learning, every salesperson is an active, integral part of the department.
REALTORS ® believe home ownership is the dream of most Canadians, and deserves a preferred place in our system of values.
And this is rightly feared by other European countries, who do not want to be reduced to efficient cogs in a system of technocratic, managerial globalism.
There are problems inherent in any system of church government.
In another sense, however, conservatism does rest in a system of belief, and is opposed as much to the theory as to the practice of socialist and liberal politics.
In Systems of Survival (reviewed in First Things, December 1993), Jacobs maintains that human beings have basically only two ways of making a living, one concerned with acquiring or protecting territories, and the other with trading or producing for trade.
But we have possibilities like never before to be learning more about ouselves and our place in the system of the Universe.
He was a connoisseur of detecting overconfidence in any system of thought» he could detect overreach (one of his favorite words) even in understatements» but he never suspected that most of those responsible for his revival would be more liberal than he ever was.
In these cultural circumstances, people in high places in both the government and Church see that, with an imperial outlook of her own, Orthodoxy might be able to fill the vacuum left by the defunct Communist Party in the system of post-Soviet administration.
I used to believe that our epidemic of religious illiteracy was rooted in large part in a system of public education unwilling and unprepared to teach our young people about the Bible and the world's religions.
Their belief in God and Bible is cradled in their system of absolute certainty that allows no deviation from an absolute standard of doctrine which is presumably based on a singular understanding of the Bible.
Brad is exactly right to point out the potential weaknesses for abuse in any system of theology (in any human system at all, really).
There is a section in that post where I introduced an original framework I developed over the past five years on «10 Pairs of Roles in Systems of Damage versus Healing.»
No such supremely individuated Being appears in the system of Difference and Repetition; in fact, any form of monotheism is ruled out in principle by the operation referred to above as «pluralizing Spinozism.»
As of late 2016, the U.N. believed that between 80,000 and 120,000 people are being held in a system of four large political prisons.
The great issues of our time are moral: the uses of power; wealth and poverty; human rights; the moral quality and character of society; loss of the sense of the common good in tandem with the pampering of private interests; domestic violence; outrageous legal and medical costs in a system of maldistributed services; unprecedented developments in biotechnologies which portend good but risk evil; the violation of public trust by high elected officials and their appointees; the growing militarization of many societies; continued racism; the persistence of hunger and malnutrition; a still exploding population in societies hard put to increase jobs and resources; abortion; euthanasia; care for the environment; the claims of future generations.
In a system of thought where «knowledge» and «being» can not be differentiated, then this means that Jesus was identified with that aspect of the perfection of God called Beauty (Jamal) or God - for - us.
The place of Jesus in the system of Thomas is very high.
We have vast knowledge as humans but if we don't have God in our lives and live the accordingly to his will, we will never experience true peace and security in this system of things.
There is very little hope in some systems of theology.
how are they «always» right or wrong in your system of thought?
either something is wrong with you (as an agent in your system of belief) or something is inherently wrong with the system itself.
There would seem to be four ways in which societies interrelate space and time in their systems of meaning: moving - time, fixed - time, moving - space, and fixed - space.
Thus, while a case for government - supported mass media may be made, other independent agencies should coexist in the field with them, and safeguards should be provided in the system of government to insure that high professional standards prevail and that the media are used for the general good rather than for partisan advantage.
Buber criticizes Aristotle, Aquinas, and Hegel because in their systems of thought man attains to consciousness of himself only in the third person.
Whereas in the system of experiencing one has only to arrange and order, and living with only one part of one's being can come to terms with the all; in realizing one.
It is no accident that the most studied Jewish philosopher of the last fifteen years has been Emmanuel Levinas» and no accident that what is taken from Levinas is a critique of totalizing logic that encloses all in a system of injustice due to its inevitable hierarchical character and his messianic hope in a future.
The formulation and expression of moral truths as positive law is, in our system of government, a system based on consent, a task confided to the people and their elected representatives.
He then leaves no doubt, however, that «in the system of real socialism» even that truth is denied.
The nation, in this system of order, would not be «sovereign.»
The bottom - up character of this order should be expressed in the system of taxation.
Improvements in the systems of restraint have been made to minimize pressure on the body and to accommodate normal body positions, but confinement is still required.
The first settlers of Salem, Hawthorne wrote in «Main - Street,» were «stalwart» men, who strode «sturdily onward,» brave and pious men of «thoughtful strength,» men «who do not merely find, but make their place in the system of human affairs.»
A higher state of consciousness diffused through the ultra-technified, ultra-socialized, ultra-cerebralized layers of the human mass, but without the emergence (neither necessary nor conceivable) at any point in the system of a universal, defined and autonomous Center of Reflection: this, by the first hypothesis, is all we are entitled to look for or desire as the eventual highest end of hominization.
Someone described the boxed - in system of dispensationalism as a structuralist's dream.
Hence we can not imprison God in an exact formula, we can not assign a place to him in a system of coordinates.
The Bible is clear that unity is found «in the Spirit,» not in a system of theology, a race of people or anything like that.
How ever could a chaos of aimless atoms eventuate in a system of moral cause and consequence?
(He considers that this view is embodied in the systems of Hegel and Bradley.)
They believe in a system of reincarnation and enlightenment, which denotes a Creator by default.
In the nature of sound he finds the true individuality of a language, each people showing, in its system of sounds, its unique preferences.
I think that the author of the article, who is an alcoholic, is expressing some frustration in the system of AA.
But then again, scripture is plain about what is to come, so I have to just let it be, don't rock the boat, and remain trapped in this system of church.
When we speak of the double efficacy of the risen Christ as ideal and as objective datum for present becoming, we might do better to speak of a «triple efficacy» of the love of Christ, for that faith, love, and communion with God which are Christ's find innumerable, if only partial, echoes in the lives of individual believers and in that system of relationships which they comprise within the world.
Ought we add: «and no existence exactly corresponding to the patterns put forth in the systems of contemporary process theologians»?
And consequently it is to equate the understanding of meaning with a total interpretation of existence and of reality in the system of Christianity.
I was frustrated because in the system of following someone else's vision — there was no room for mine.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z