Aircraft emissions probably play a crucial role
in ozone destruction by fuelling the formation of polar stratospheric clouds.
This air contained the chlorine compounds implicated
in ozone destruction.
The concentration of pollutants such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) represents one key factor
in ozone destruction, but weather conditions impact the hole as well.
«Anytime you introduce even initially unreactive surfaces into the stratosphere, you get reactions that ultimately result
in ozone destruction as they are coated with sulfuric acid,» said Keutsch.
Not exact matches
Global warming, the
ozone hole, overpopulation, starvation and malnutrition, war, unemployment, the
destruction of species and the rain forests, pollution of water and air, pesticide and herbicide poisoning, errors
in genetic engineering, erosion of topsoil, overfishing, anarchy and crime, the possibility of a nuclear mishap, chemical warfare or all - out nuclear war: together, or
in some cases singly, these dangers threaten to «catch us unexpectedly, like a trap.»
We have, for example, already taken some measures to deal with one of the probable causes of the growing holes
in the
ozone layer, and to reverse the
destruction of European forests by acid rain.
On the contrary, the use of currently recommended photochemical parameters leads to insufficient
ozone destruction in the model.
Recently, additional
ozone production mechanisms have been proposed to resolve the
ozone deficit problem, which arises from greater
ozone destruction than production
in several photochemical models of the upper stratosphere and lower mesosphere.
Sunshine
in the southern spring and summer creates even more
ozone - depleting gases, leading to the massive
destruction of up to 65 percent of the
ozone layer.
At a hearing before the House of Representatives Science Committee last week, John Doolittle, a Republican from California, said that research implicating CFCs
in the
destruction of
ozone is «very much open to debate», and there is «no established consensus» on the role of CFCs.
In addition, particles of these clouds may descend and withdraw reactive nitrogen from the chlorine - activated layer — active chlorine is one of the substances mainly responsible for
ozone destruction.
The formation of large areas of high pressure
in the lower atmosphere both lowers
ozone levels, by squeezing the
ozone layer above, and may provide the very cold conditions
in which
ozone destruction is greatest.
«More specifically, different colors (or wavelengths) of ultraviolet light can affect oxygen and
ozone production and
destruction in different ways.»
NASA's upper atmosphere research satellite, for example, carries the British - made microwave limb sounder (MLS) which measures concentrations of chlorine monoxide — a chemical that plays a critical part
in the
destruction of
ozone.
«These extra particles may enhance the heterogeneous reactions, leading to
ozone destruction, and this
ozone depletion above Antarctica may worsen
in 1992 by spreading to altitudes beyond the 12 to 20 kilometres layer.»
And
in the lower stratosphere, where the
ozone destruction is concentrated, this figure may rise to 60 per cent.
It's formula is C21H27FO6, making it a hydrofluorocarbon — a category of compounds perhaps best known for replacing chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) when their role
in the
destruction of the
ozone layer was discovered.
-- The Administrator may promulgate regulations to add to the list of class I and class II, group I, substances that may be destroyed for
destruction offset credits, taking into account a candidate substance's carbon dioxide equivalent value,
ozone depletion potential, prevalence
in banks
in the United States, and emission rates, as well as the need for additional cost containment under the class II, group II cap and the integrity of the class II, group II cap.
«Free oxygen [O2]
in the atmosphere is required to form a protective layer of
ozone [O3], which can shield methane from photochemical
destruction,» Reinhard said.
Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) are a sign of extremely cold temperatures
in the stratosphere and some types of PSCs are responsible for
ozone destruction.
The chemical balance
in the stratosphere is changed significantly by the presence of these clouds, altering the breakdown products from manmade CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) so that rapid chemical
ozone destruction can occur
in the presence of sunlight.
Our consumer behavior is immersed
in a fatalistic dynamic with a destiny to climate change (deforestation, loss of biodiversity,
ozone, etc.), and our own self -
destruction as a species.
Comment on 13: I fully agree with Markus Rex that total
ozone measurements can not give any clues on chemical
destruction in isolated layers, and that we may have been lucky that O3 transport cancelled out the chemical thinning that happened during the last months.
«If left unregulated, rocket launches by the year 2050 could result
in more
ozone destruction than was ever realized by CFCs.»
The chemical balance
in the stratosphere is changed significantly by the presence of these clouds, altering the breakdown products from manmade CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) so that rapid chemical
ozone destruction can occur
in the presence of sunlight.
There is nothing «natural» about these extremes of weather over the last 2 years, or about the unprecedented
ozone hole
in the Arctic last year (troposphere warming from greenhouse gases caused stratospheric cooling to below threshold temperature for polar stratospheric cloud generation and
ozone destruction).
An example of this kind of surprise happened
in relation to the Antarctic
ozone hole, where unexpected chemistry on surfaces of ice particles lead to much more efficient
destruction of
ozone in the polar vortex than had been expected, making an existing concern into a serious problem.
In the upper stratosphere (beyond the protection of the
ozone layer), ultraviolet light caused CFCs to break apart, releasing chlorine, a very reactive atom that repeatedly catalyzes
ozone destruction.
The
destruction of the
ozone layer (most directly linked to the ongoing geoengineering assault) is also a massive contributing factor
in regard to coral bleaching and the global die - off
in general.
Note that although my original article referred primarily to solar protons I have since decided that the «culprit» is changes
in the mix of all particles and wavelengths from the sun
in so far as they affect the
ozone creation /
destruction process differentially at different heights
in the atmosphere.
Chemical
ozone destruction occurs over both polar regions
in local winter — spring.
Here we demonstrate that chemical
ozone destruction over the Arctic
in early 2011 was — for the first time
in the observational record — comparable to that
in the Antarctic
ozone hole.
Scientists monitoring the highest levels of the atmosphere say they have detected a slowing
in the rate of
destruction of Earth» s protective veil of
ozone, the first sign that the phasing out of chemicals that harm the
ozone layer is having a restorative effect.
In colder years, more ice particles will freeze, allowing more chemical
destruction of the
ozone layer.
The number of particles that form, and therefore the amount of chemical
ozone destruction, is extremely sensitive to small changes
in stratospheric temperature.
«A new mechanism accounts for the catalytic
destruction of
ozone in the absence of oxygen atoms.9 Rapid
ozone loss begins as the first rays of sunlight illuminate the vortex
in spring.
«The sun causes latitudinal climate zone shifting with changes
in the degree of jetstream zonality / meridionality by altering the
ozone creation /
destruction balance differentially at different heights above the tropopause.
Requires the EPA Administrator to promulgate regulations establishing a program for the issuance of offset credits that: (1) ensure that such offset credits represent verifiable and additional GHG emission reductions or avoidance, or increases
in sequestration; (2) ensure that offset credits issued for sequestration offset projects are only issued for GHG reductions that are permanent; and (3) include as reductions
in GHGs reductions achieved through the
destruction of methane and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) or other
ozone depleting substances.
Note that the inversion at the tropopause is entirely a result of
ozone reacting with incoming solar radiation and particles so any change
in the
ozone creation /
destruction balance is going to affect the air circulation below the tropopause.
«(5) include as reductions
in greenhouse gases reductions achieved through the
destruction of methane and its conversion to carbon dioxide, and reductions achieved through
destruction of chlorofluorocarbons or other
ozone depleting substances, if permitted by the Administrator under section 619 (b)(9) and subject to the conditions specified
in section 619 (b)(9), based on the carbon dioxide equivalent value of the substance destroyed.
-- The Administrator may promulgate regulations to add to the list of class I and class II, group I, substances that may be destroyed for
destruction offset credits, taking into account a candidate substance's carbon dioxide equivalent value,
ozone depletion potential, prevalence
in banks
in the United States, and emission rates, as well as the need for additional cost containment under the class II, group II cap and the integrity of the class II, group II cap.
The
ozone formation -
destruction process
in the stratosphere occurs rapidly and constantly, maintaining an
ozone layer.
Effectively she appears to at least confirm the possibility of my proposition that what is going on is an entirely natural solar induced process (
destruction of
ozone in the upper atmosphere by more incoming solar protons) which casts doubt on all previous assumptions concerning human CO2 AND CFCs.
The focus is the EPP Indirect Effect (IE), whereby NOx produced
in the mesosphere or thermosphere via EPP (EPP - NOx) descends to the stratosphere during the polar winter, where it can participate
in catalytic
ozone destruction.
The
destruction of the
ozone layer
in the atmosphere and the global greenhouse effect contribute
in the occurrence of this phenomenon.
It was only
in the 1980's, with the confirmation of the
destruction of the
ozone layer, that the criticism took form as an undeniable proof that humanity is able to cause dramatic changes to the planet.
The result was a shock: at least 60 % of
ozone destruction at the poles seems to be due to an unknown mechanism, Rex told a meeting of stratosphere researchers
in Bremen, Germany, last week....
Countries agreed to end their production of the substances ultimately responsible for
destruction of the
ozone in 1987 with the Montreal Protocol.
Later
in the early summer as temperatures warm, the reaction slows down and the
destruction of
Ozone stops.
In fact, when asked to name problems facing the nation, Americans would think of pollution of drinking water, the
ozone hole, or the
destruction of tropical forests ahead of global warming.