Scientists suggest that the size difference is primarily due to differences
in ozone exposure.
Not exact matches
In 2004, Looy and her former Ph.D. advisor Henk Visscher proposed one way this might have played out, bases on fossilized abnormal plant spores found worldwide: volcanic gases — halocarbons like methyl chloride and methyl bromide — destroyed much or all of Earth's ozone layer, boosting UV - B exposure that would have affected life and potentially increased the genetic mutation rates in pollen and spores of plants worldwid
In 2004, Looy and her former Ph.D. advisor Henk Visscher proposed one way this might have played out, bases on fossilized abnormal plant spores found worldwide: volcanic gases — halocarbons like methyl chloride and methyl bromide — destroyed much or all of Earth's
ozone layer, boosting UV - B
exposure that would have affected life and potentially increased the genetic mutation rates
in pollen and spores of plants worldwid
in pollen and spores of plants worldwide.
In some parts of Asia, Africa and South America, the researchers identified data gaps which prevented them from characterizing
ozone pollution
exposure patterns.
However, limited and scattered
ozone datasets left scientists unable to answer basic questions about the distribution and trends
in ozone pollution in many parts of the world: In which regions of the world do people face the greatest ozone exposur
in ozone pollution
in many parts of the world: In which regions of the world do people face the greatest ozone exposur
in many parts of the world:
In which regions of the world do people face the greatest ozone exposur
In which regions of the world do people face the greatest
ozone exposure?
So Weschler and Wisthaler simulated a typical office environment at the Technical University of Denmark
in Copenhagen — two people
in a carpeted 28.5 — cubic meter room at a temperature of 23 degrees Celsius with two small stainless steel tables, two chairs, two flat - screen LCD monitors, two headsets, one walkie - talkie, one small mixing fan, a few books, two laptops, two bottles of water and
ozone concentrations that reached roughly 32 parts per billion, an average
exposure for a hot, smoggy day.
While elevated
ozone did decrease the Phl p 5 allergen content
in pollen, «the strong CO2 - stimulation of pollen production suggests increased
exposure to Timothy grass allergen overall,» even if O3 projections are realized, the authors note.
A new study of 60 million Americans — about 97 % of people age 65 and older
in the United States — shows that long - term
exposure to airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and
ozone increases the risk of premature death, even when that
exposure is at levels below the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) currently established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Specifically, a 4 ug / m3 increase
in exposure to small particulate matter of less than 2.5
in diameter (PM2.5) was associated with a 2 % increased risk of stillbirth, while
exposure to nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, PM10 and
ozone were also linked to a heightened risk.
«EPA acknowledges the newer studies on
ozone «do not materially change any of the broad scientific conclusions regarding the health effects of
exposure,»» the group said
in a statement.
In this section, we consider the population within a 5 km radius around a TOAR ozone monitoring station; hereafter referred to as the «monitored population», and estimate their exposure in terms of exceedances of one metric: NDGT6
In this section, we consider the population within a 5 km radius around a TOAR
ozone monitoring station; hereafter referred to as the «monitored population», and estimate their
exposure in terms of exceedances of one metric: NDGT6
in terms of exceedances of one metric: NDGT60.
These findings further suggest reduced
exposure to high levels of
ozone in parts of North America and Europe, but increased
exposure to moderate to high
ozone levels at a small proportion of urban locations, although many sites
in these two regions have non-significant trends.
As noted above, the first three metrics are associated with regulatory standards
in different world regions for the protection of human health to acute or short - term
exposure to
ozone.
This shift, coupled with limited
ozone monitoring
in most developing nations, has left a number of fundamental outstanding questions: Which regions of the world have the greatest human and plant
exposure to
ozone pollution?
Plants and animals have adapted to the normal seasonal cycle of total
ozone and UV and are not used to high UV -
exposure during the part of their lifecycle that takes place
in spring (e.g. germination, growths of buds, algea blooms
in the Arctic ocean,...).
Long - term
exposure to high levels of road traffic and
ozone significantly increases the risk of asthma symptoms, asthma attacks or the need for use of asthma medications, according to a new study published
in the European Respiratory Journal [1].
In a cooperative effort between Duke and Duke Kunshan University, researchers found higher
exposure to ground - level
ozone led to higher blood pressure and blood platelet activation — risk factors for cardiovascular health.
This outcome is important to researchers as well as policymakers and regulators, who use
exposure metrics to assess how changes
in ozone levels affect human health, vegetation, and climate.
The remnants of the vortex — which contain the depleted
ozone — typically pass overhead at about 45 to 50 degrees north latitude, over parts of Europe and North America, for a few days
in spring, causing the potential for ultraviolet (UV) radiation
exposure to increase, said Rex.
Plants and animals have adapted to the normal seasonal cycle of total
ozone and UV and are not used to high UV -
exposure during the part of their lifecycle that takes place
in spring (e.g. germination, growths of buds, algea blooms
in the Arctic ocean,...).
The response of leaf photosynthesis and metabolite profiles to
ozone (O3)
exposure ranging from 37 to 116 ppb was investigated
in two soybean cultivars Dwight and IA3010
in the field...
Another recent paper
in Nature Climate Change makes the point vividly: Bumping ambition up from 2 to 1.5 degrees would prevent 150 million premature deaths through 2100, 90 million through reduced
exposure to particulates, 60 million due to reduced
ozone.