In my last SLAW tip, I talked about using legislation to find definitions,
in particular interpretation acts.
It's opinions about many things do not apply to any other people than those that believe
in that particular interpretation.
As my exchange with Ham has circulated around the blogosphere, I've heard from a lot of people eager to remind me that Ham has a lot invested
in his particular interpretation of Genesis.
In turn, these developments are reflected
in particular interpretations of texts.
Not exact matches
If your truth is only acceptance and belief
in a
particular narrative and
interpretation, then
in truth, you haven't really even started the journey to know the truth, you've merely duped yourself with a short - cut and ready - made answers.
There is some utility
in drawing distinctions, no doubt, but your distinctions are tinged with disdain for fellow Christians who don't subscribe to your
particular interpretation.
Even the various forms of theological activity can be redescribed
in narrative terms, as when Newbigin writes of «the congregation as hermeneutic of the gospel»:
interpretation of Scripture for Newbigin is not so much what a
particular scholar writes as what a
particular community of believers enacts.
Most disagree with the practices,
interpretation and doctrine of the other sects and many consider anyone who isn't
in their
particular church as «not true Christians».
In the Whiteheadian
interpretation of reality, these initial aims proposed by God are not capricious nor due to inscrutable divine purposes for his creatures, but are relevant aims toward maximizing the intensity of experience which is possible from the
particular perspective of each concrescing occasion.
He «trusted»
in a personal and very
particular interpretation that went unchecked.
The apparent irrelevance of distance and the importance of
particular personal affinities
in the more striking stories about telepathy favor this
interpretation.
The modifications
in Christian belief above referred to
in no sense discredit this revelation; they are modifications only
in man's
interpretation of it, and
in particular, they arise from new ways of looking at the Bible as this is seen
in its historical, prescientific setting.
Yet the context of Christian worship
in which a passage from another scripture is read may suggest a
particular meaning or
interpretation for the chosen passage.
... the contextual approach to the
interpretation of Scripture involves a dialogue between the historical situation and Scripture, a dialogue
in which the interpreters approach Scripture with a
particular perspective (their world - and - life view) and approach their situation with a
particular comprehension of the Word of God (their theology)... 8
This way of speaking about the authority of Scripture stands
in contrast to how it is often spoken of among Christians, as a phrase invoked to shut down conversation and bolster one
particular interpretation of Scripture.
A change
in the dominant media of mass communication
in the culture creates a radically new situation for communication
in general and,
in particular, for the transmission and
interpretation of the Bible and of God's revelation.
Why do some sects travel to other countries and incite violence against people
in the name of their
particular interpretation?
In Rhetoric and Biblical Interpretation they recommend that the definition of rhetoric be broadened to its fullest range in the classical tradition, namely as «the means by which a text establishes and manages it relationship to its audience in order to achieve a particular effect.&raqu
In Rhetoric and Biblical
Interpretation they recommend that the definition of rhetoric be broadened to its fullest range
in the classical tradition, namely as «the means by which a text establishes and manages it relationship to its audience in order to achieve a particular effect.&raqu
in the classical tradition, namely as «the means by which a text establishes and manages it relationship to its audience
in order to achieve a particular effect.&raqu
in order to achieve a
particular effect.»
3 Here I must make
particular acknowledgment of von Rad's Des Erste Buch Mose, cited
in Chapter I. Readers familiar with that work will recognize both the dependence upon, and the departure from, von Rad's
interpretation.
The analysis further suggests that the language of time consists of systematically ambiguous terms, each with several
interpretations, and that
in particular the notion of time itself can indicate any of the distinguished elements of time, the alternative ways of conceiving of these elements, and their several combinations.
It starts from the ground of
particular observation; it takes a flight
in the thin air of imaginative generalization; and again lands for renewed observation rendered acute by rational
interpretation» (PR 5/7).
In our
particular case the intended
interpretation of the formal system would be our cosmic epoch, and provided that there were truths about it that the formal system either did not express or contradicted, the formal system could be judged inadequate.
In his concluding section on eschatological fulfillment, Jenson's
interpretation of the final judgment as «rectification» deserves
particular attention.
In the wake of Latin American liberation hermeneutics, religious communities and academics in the various countries of Africa and Asia have developed analogous forms of biblical interpretation that work from the particular experiences of those nation
In the wake of Latin American liberation hermeneutics, religious communities and academics
in the various countries of Africa and Asia have developed analogous forms of biblical interpretation that work from the particular experiences of those nation
in the various countries of Africa and Asia have developed analogous forms of biblical
interpretation that work from the
particular experiences of those nations.
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are
in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself
in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all of our descriptions of our observations involve culturally conditioned
interpretations; the idea that our
interpretations, and the focus of our conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves
in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself
in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist
in the «red brick» itself
in the «red brick» itself).
But the value determining intentions and purposes are likely to be more variable, more relativized to context, to small groups, to individuals» personal histories and
particular context than the respects
in which
interpretation might be made.
If instead of following their leaders and their
particular interpretations they would obey the Scriptures they would not be
in a state of Panic.
Interpretation must always establish the permanent content of truth behind the mode of expression, and ascertain why historically it was uttered
in that
particular mode.
In Daniel (1913) we find Buber's concern for unity, realization, and creativity expressed for the first time entirely in its own terms and not as the interpretation of some particular thought or religious or cultural movemen
In Daniel (1913) we find Buber's concern for unity, realization, and creativity expressed for the first time entirely
in its own terms and not as the interpretation of some particular thought or religious or cultural movemen
in its own terms and not as the
interpretation of some
particular thought or religious or cultural movement.
The important implication of this is that television
in particular and the mass media
in general (particularly the commercial media) are presenting a consistent and integrated system of belief and social
interpretation as a pattern for social understanding and development.
Every
interpretation of the meaning of human experience, every understanding of the world
in its totality, must by necessity start from some
particular stance — or, better, must find some
particular point that is taken to be of special importance among all the events or occasions; it provides a clue to the totality of experience.
Buber's philosophy of dialogue has been of
particular importance
in the Biblical
interpretation with which he has been mainly concerned
in his later years.
The reader needs to ponder what passion, resilience and steadfastness are required to keep a
particular interpretive agenda always
in view through such a long text, some of which is less than scintillating and some of which surely defies
interpretation.
Ford's own answer to the question of God's location
in general and the relativity problem
in particular rests upon his Boethian
interpretation of Whitehead, discussed above.
This involves understanding Whitehead's and Nietzsche's conceptions of time within the context of their basic philosophic visions and,
in particular,
in relation to their
interpretations of the nature of value and the good.
Adela Yarbro Collins summarizes the results of more recent study of apocalyptic writings
in general and of Revelation
in particular in» Reading the Book of Revelation
in the Twentieth Century,»
Interpretation 40 (1986): 229 - 242.
When the doctrine of Providence is given a deterministic
interpretation the notion of «calling» can too easily be used to justify the
particular class structure
in which we find ourselves.26
The doctrine of the «rapture» was born out of a
particular interpretation of 1 Thessalonians 4:17, where believers «will be caught up together with them
in the clouds to meet the Lord
in the air.»
If the program of Bultmann is not carried to the concrete existence of a
particular congregation, then we are left with a universally applicable
interpretation of Scripture
in terms of «the human situation».
Though nothing new is here, the discussion of questions of context (liberal, modern, neo-orthodox; ecumenical, realist, biblical), texts and contexts (matters of biblical
interpretation) and the way
in which Christian affirmations are appropriately translated into
particular settings is stimulating.
In this respect, faith is essentially an assent to a particular interpretation of an event, an interpretation not necessarily self - evident in the event itsel
In this respect, faith is essentially an assent to a
particular interpretation of an event, an
interpretation not necessarily self - evident
in the event itsel
in the event itself.
In addition, it must be observed that all the Churches which reject universal tradition as a rule of truth in the interpretation of the scriptures and insist on their own particular tradition as sole criterion of truth, do not adopt a credible point of vie
In addition, it must be observed that all the Churches which reject universal tradition as a rule of truth
in the interpretation of the scriptures and insist on their own particular tradition as sole criterion of truth, do not adopt a credible point of vie
in the
interpretation of the scriptures and insist on their own
particular tradition as sole criterion of truth, do not adopt a credible point of view.
«Process hermeneutics» has developed a distinctive theory of
interpretation, understanding, and meaning from Whitehead's general view of perception —
in particular his notions of «symbolic reference and of «propositions» (see WH and APPH).
Panexperientialism resists the completely deterministic
interpretation of this idea, according to which the temporally prior condition fully determines every present event: When the event
in question is an individual occasion of experience, it has a mental pole, which is partly self - determining (In Whitehead's words, the ontological principle «could also be termed the «principle of efficient, and final, causation,»» because it says that «every condition to which the process of becoming conforms in any particular instance has its reason either in the character of some actual entity in the actual world of that concrescence or in the character of the subject which is in process of concrescence» [PR 24]
in question is an individual occasion of experience, it has a mental pole, which is partly self - determining (
In Whitehead's words, the ontological principle «could also be termed the «principle of efficient, and final, causation,»» because it says that «every condition to which the process of becoming conforms in any particular instance has its reason either in the character of some actual entity in the actual world of that concrescence or in the character of the subject which is in process of concrescence» [PR 24]
In Whitehead's words, the ontological principle «could also be termed the «principle of efficient, and final, causation,»» because it says that «every condition to which the process of becoming conforms
in any particular instance has its reason either in the character of some actual entity in the actual world of that concrescence or in the character of the subject which is in process of concrescence» [PR 24]
in any
particular instance has its reason either
in the character of some actual entity in the actual world of that concrescence or in the character of the subject which is in process of concrescence» [PR 24]
in the character of some actual entity
in the actual world of that concrescence or in the character of the subject which is in process of concrescence» [PR 24]
in the actual world of that concrescence or
in the character of the subject which is in process of concrescence» [PR 24]
in the character of the subject which is
in process of concrescence» [PR 24]
in process of concrescence» [PR 24].)
it starts from the ground of
particular observation; it makes a flight
in the thin air of imaginative generalization; and it again lands for renewed observation rendered acute by rational
interpretation.»
Further, most are absolutely certain that their
particular interpretations are correct, and that the many hundreds of faith groups which teach opposing beliefs are
in error.»
We often differ both
in our
interpretation of the broad sweep of history and
in our understanding of what is really the case (the «facts»)
in a
particular situation.
If we're raised
in a culture that tells us a
particular biblical
interpretation or political position aligns with God's point of view, we accept it.
In consequence, the assumptions characterizing a
particular approach to Whitehead can and do affect the accuracy and coherence of the
interpretations yielded by that approach.
How often I have heard «the Bible is clear» (
in what it says), followed by a proclamation (actually their «
interpretation») of what the Bible says on a
particular topic or
in a
particular passage that is probably way off base if one knows the historical and cultural context.